Brookline Bancorp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Brookline Bancorp Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Brookline Bancorp Inc (BRKL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $33.62 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.31 Billion) in one year. Check Brookline Bancorp Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Brookline Bancorp Inc (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Brookline Bancorp Inc from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Brookline Bancorp Inc across 28 annual periods. Check Brookline Bancorp Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Brookline Bancorp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
Brookline Bancorp Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Brookline Bancorp Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Brookline Bancorp Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.01x | $104.95 Million | $10.68 Billion | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $116.60 Million | $10.18 Billion | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $120.76 Million | $8.19 Billion | ▼ -95.8% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $133.21 Million | $377.83 Million | ▲ +164.7% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $112.49 Million | $844.39 Million | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $102.72 Million | $927.62 Million | ▲ +483.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $123.03 Million | $6.48 Billion | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $84.95 Million | $5.97 Billion | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $77.93 Million | $5.74 Billion | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $64.60 Million | $5.37 Billion | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $84.29 Million | $5.15 Billion | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $74.02 Million | $4.71 Billion | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $59.31 Million | $4.53 Billion | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $46.23 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $41.10 Million | $2.22 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $36.15 Million | $2.13 Billion | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $41.60 Million | $2.12 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $39.25 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $34.76 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $42.30 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $27.96 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $23.89 Million | $917.35 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $17.09 Million | $790.98 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $23.67 Million | $814.15 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $15.04 Million | $753.57 Million | ▼ -14.2% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $14.70 Million | $632.50 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | $16.60 Million | $600.80 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $19.62 Million | $568.36 Million | — |