Bruker Corporation (BRKR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bruker Corporation (BRKR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $229.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.73 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Bruker Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Bruker Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Bruker Corporation across 27 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Bruker Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Bruker Corporation (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bruker Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Bruker Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $134.10 Million | $3.73 Billion | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $251.30 Million | $3.99 Billion | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $350.10 Million | $2.84 Billion | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $262.00 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $282.40 Million | $2.57 Billion | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $333.20 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $213.40 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $239.70 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $154.40 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $130.80 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▼ -49.1% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | $229.20 Million | $998.00 Million | ▲ +119.6% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $114.30 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $145.00 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $133.10 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $87.70 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -47.1% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $156.10 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $149.80 Million | $753.20 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $106.90 Million | $803.60 Million | ▲ +38.7% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $28.21 Million | $294.02 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $37.69 Million | $241.48 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2005 | 0.28x | $42.19 Million | $152.85 Million | ▲ +4884.2% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | $-889.00K | $154.08 Million | ▲ +85.9% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-6.08 Million | $148.48 Million | ▲ +72.4% |
| 2002 | -0.15x | $-11.39 Million | $76.72 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2001 | -0.19x | $-11.47 Million | $61.53 Million | ▼ -5475.0% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $-202.00K | $60.38 Million | ▼ -103.5% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $5.44 Million | $57.25 Million | — |