Bruker Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bruker Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Bruker Corporation (BRKR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $229.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.73 Billion) in one year. Check BRKR cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Bruker Corporation (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Bruker Corporation from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Bruker Corporation across 27 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Bruker Corporation reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Bruker Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Bruker Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bruker Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Bruker Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $134.10 Million | $3.73 Billion | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $251.30 Million | $3.99 Billion | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $350.10 Million | $2.84 Billion | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $262.00 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $282.40 Million | $2.57 Billion | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $333.20 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $213.40 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $239.70 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $154.40 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $130.80 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▼ -49.1% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | $229.20 Million | $998.00 Million | ▲ +119.6% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $114.30 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $145.00 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $133.10 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $87.70 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -47.1% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $156.10 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $149.80 Million | $753.20 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $106.90 Million | $803.60 Million | ▲ +38.7% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $28.21 Million | $294.02 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $37.69 Million | $241.48 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2005 | 0.28x | $42.19 Million | $152.85 Million | ▲ +4884.2% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | $-889.00K | $154.08 Million | ▲ +85.9% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-6.08 Million | $148.48 Million | ▲ +72.4% |
| 2002 | -0.15x | $-11.39 Million | $76.72 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2001 | -0.19x | $-11.47 Million | $61.53 Million | ▼ -5475.0% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $-202.00K | $60.38 Million | ▼ -103.5% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $5.44 Million | $57.25 Million | — |