China Automotive Systems Inc (CAAS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
China Automotive Systems Inc (CAAS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $30.99 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($513.31 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of China Automotive Systems Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
China Automotive Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for China Automotive Systems Inc across 25 annual periods. Also explore CAAS year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for China Automotive Systems Inc (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for China Automotive Systems Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see China Automotive Systems Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $111.63 Million | $551.00 Million | ▲ +855.0% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $9.78 Million | $460.79 Million | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | $19.91 Million | $398.02 Million | ▼ -59.7% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $48.02 Million | $386.94 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $28.27 Million | $379.32 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $57.43 Million | $387.64 Million | ▲ +71.4% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $30.29 Million | $350.59 Million | ▲ +166.0% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $12.53 Million | $385.67 Million | ▼ -73.4% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $50.15 Million | $411.24 Million | ▲ +236.0% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $11.82 Million | $325.81 Million | ▼ -72.2% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | $39.27 Million | $300.40 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | $45.70 Million | $330.99 Million | ▲ +215.1% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $12.88 Million | $293.84 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $16.21 Million | $253.43 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $34.06 Million | $250.29 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $38.55 Million | $256.98 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $34.96 Million | $180.19 Million | ▲ +49.9% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $16.37 Million | $126.49 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $11.32 Million | $92.58 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $7.97 Million | $75.62 Million | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $13.39 Million | $60.85 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2004 | 0.38x | $21.31 Million | $55.78 Million | ▲ +359.2% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $4.26 Million | $51.15 Million | ▲ +101.0% |
| 2002 | -7.99x | $-8.81 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -2706104.6% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $2.19K | $7.40 Million | — |