CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.86 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($710.17 Million) in one year. Check CECO cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CECO Environmental Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CECO Environmental Corp. across 36 annual periods. Also explore CECO Environmental Corp. asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CECO Environmental Corp. (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CECO Environmental Corp.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CECO Environmental Corp. stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $5.86 Million | $570.59 Million | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $24.83 Million | $507.81 Million | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $44.65 Million | $362.80 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $29.65 Million | $286.57 Million | ▲ +63.6% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $13.30 Million | $210.24 Million | ▲ +222.7% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $4.42 Million | $225.52 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $10.23 Million | $221.48 Million | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $21.95 Million | $214.02 Million | ▲ +293.4% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $6.57 Million | $251.98 Million | ▼ -88.4% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $69.60 Million | $308.55 Million | ▲ +521.2% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $12.64 Million | $348.03 Million | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $16.26 Million | $233.79 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $24.18 Million | $178.13 Million | ▼ -74.1% |
| 2012 | 0.52x | $16.83 Million | $32.11 Million | ▲ +118.1% |
| 2011 | 0.24x | $8.74 Million | $36.35 Million | ▲ +224.1% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $2.94 Million | $39.62 Million | ▼ -77.2% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $14.89 Million | $45.76 Million | ▲ +384.0% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $5.08 Million | $75.50 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $3.96 Million | $55.61 Million | ▲ +182.8% |
| 2006 | -0.09x | $-4.15 Million | $48.27 Million | ▼ -220.1% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $2.59 Million | $36.12 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $1.88 Million | $36.19 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $1.59 Million | $33.89 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $3.70 Million | $37.27 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $4.38 Million | $43.21 Million | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $2.63 Million | $48.83 Million | ▲ +369.9% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-837.21K | $41.94 Million | ▲ +79.6% |
| 1998 | -0.10x | $-759.07K | $7.77 Million | ▼ -133.1% |
| 1997 | 0.30x | $2.06 Million | $6.97 Million | ▲ +739.8% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $110.16K | $3.13 Million | ▲ +300.6% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-61.03K | $3.48 Million | ▼ -102.9% |
| 1994 | 0.61x | $1.40 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +350.2% |
| 1993 | -0.24x | $-900.00K | $3.70 Million | ▼ -118.9% |
| 1991 | -0.11x | $-100.00K | $900.00K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.11x | $-100.00K | $900.00K | ▼ -44.4% |
| 1989 | -0.08x | $-100.00K | $1.30 Million | — |