CECO Environmental Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CECO Environmental Corp. cash flow-to-debt ratio. CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-19.33 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.65 Billion) in one year. Check CECO cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of CECO Environmental Corp. (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of CECO Environmental Corp. from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for CECO Environmental Corp. across 36 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of CECO Environmental Corp. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CECO Environmental Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
CECO Environmental Corp. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CECO Environmental Corp.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CECO cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $5.86 Million | $570.59 Million | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $24.83 Million | $507.81 Million | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $44.65 Million | $362.80 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $29.65 Million | $286.57 Million | ▲ +63.6% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $13.30 Million | $210.24 Million | ▲ +222.7% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $4.42 Million | $225.52 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $10.23 Million | $221.48 Million | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $21.95 Million | $214.02 Million | ▲ +293.4% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $6.57 Million | $251.98 Million | ▼ -88.4% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $69.60 Million | $308.55 Million | ▲ +521.2% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $12.64 Million | $348.03 Million | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $16.26 Million | $233.79 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $24.18 Million | $178.13 Million | ▼ -74.1% |
| 2012 | 0.52x | $16.83 Million | $32.11 Million | ▲ +118.1% |
| 2011 | 0.24x | $8.74 Million | $36.35 Million | ▲ +224.1% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $2.94 Million | $39.62 Million | ▼ -77.2% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $14.89 Million | $45.76 Million | ▲ +384.0% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $5.08 Million | $75.50 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $3.96 Million | $55.61 Million | ▲ +182.8% |
| 2006 | -0.09x | $-4.15 Million | $48.27 Million | ▼ -220.1% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $2.59 Million | $36.12 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $1.88 Million | $36.19 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $1.59 Million | $33.89 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $3.70 Million | $37.27 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $4.38 Million | $43.21 Million | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $2.63 Million | $48.83 Million | ▲ +369.9% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-837.21K | $41.94 Million | ▲ +79.6% |
| 1998 | -0.10x | $-759.07K | $7.77 Million | ▼ -133.1% |
| 1997 | 0.30x | $2.06 Million | $6.97 Million | ▲ +739.8% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $110.16K | $3.13 Million | ▲ +300.6% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-61.03K | $3.48 Million | ▼ -102.9% |
| 1994 | 0.61x | $1.40 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +350.2% |
| 1993 | -0.24x | $-900.00K | $3.70 Million | ▼ -118.9% |
| 1991 | -0.11x | $-100.00K | $900.00K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.11x | $-100.00K | $900.00K | ▼ -44.4% |
| 1989 | -0.08x | $-100.00K | $1.30 Million | — |