CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.86 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($710.17 Million) in one year. See CECO Environmental Corp. free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CECO Environmental Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CECO Environmental Corp. across 36 annual periods. Also explore CECO shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CECO Environmental Corp. (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CECO Environmental Corp.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CECO market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $5.86 Million | $570.59 Million | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $24.83 Million | $507.81 Million | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $44.65 Million | $362.80 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $29.65 Million | $286.57 Million | ▲ +63.6% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $13.30 Million | $210.24 Million | ▲ +222.7% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $4.42 Million | $225.52 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $10.23 Million | $221.48 Million | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $21.95 Million | $214.02 Million | ▲ +293.4% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $6.57 Million | $251.98 Million | ▼ -88.4% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $69.60 Million | $308.55 Million | ▲ +521.2% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $12.64 Million | $348.03 Million | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $16.26 Million | $233.79 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $24.18 Million | $178.13 Million | ▼ -74.1% |
| 2012 | 0.52x | $16.83 Million | $32.11 Million | ▲ +118.1% |
| 2011 | 0.24x | $8.74 Million | $36.35 Million | ▲ +224.1% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $2.94 Million | $39.62 Million | ▼ -77.2% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $14.89 Million | $45.76 Million | ▲ +384.0% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $5.08 Million | $75.50 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $3.96 Million | $55.61 Million | ▲ +182.8% |
| 2006 | -0.09x | $-4.15 Million | $48.27 Million | ▼ -220.1% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $2.59 Million | $36.12 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $1.88 Million | $36.19 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $1.59 Million | $33.89 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $3.70 Million | $37.27 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $4.38 Million | $43.21 Million | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $2.63 Million | $48.83 Million | ▲ +369.9% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-837.21K | $41.94 Million | ▲ +79.6% |
| 1998 | -0.10x | $-759.07K | $7.77 Million | ▼ -133.1% |
| 1997 | 0.30x | $2.06 Million | $6.97 Million | ▲ +739.8% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $110.16K | $3.13 Million | ▲ +300.6% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-61.03K | $3.48 Million | ▼ -102.9% |
| 1994 | 0.61x | $1.40 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +350.2% |
| 1993 | -0.24x | $-900.00K | $3.70 Million | ▼ -118.9% |
| 1991 | -0.11x | $-100.00K | $900.00K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.11x | $-100.00K | $900.00K | ▼ -44.4% |
| 1989 | -0.08x | $-100.00K | $1.30 Million | — |