Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock cash flow-to-debt ratio. Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (CETY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-828.03K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($7.95 Million) in one year. Check Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common S earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (2003–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock from 2003 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock across 23 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common S reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2003–2025)
Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2003 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common S (CETY) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.28x | $-7.92 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -144.9% |
| 2024 | -0.52x | $-3.56 Million | $6.79 Million | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2023 | -0.95x | $-4.78 Million | $5.06 Million | ▼ -162.7% |
| 2022 | -0.36x | $-2.24 Million | $6.24 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2021 | -0.31x | $-2.55 Million | $8.15 Million | ▼ -148.7% |
| 2020 | -0.13x | $-1.43 Million | $11.36 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2019 | -0.23x | $-2.22 Million | $9.56 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2018 | -0.19x | $-1.44 Million | $7.61 Million | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2017 | -0.22x | $-1.50 Million | $6.89 Million | ▼ -113.4% |
| 2016 | -0.10x | $-513.19K | $5.05 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2015 | -0.16x | $-703.00K | $4.50 Million | ▲ +66.3% |
| 2014 | -0.46x | $-708.34K | $1.53 Million | ▼ -360.9% |
| 2013 | -0.10x | $-103.57K | $1.03 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2012 | -0.22x | $-314.33K | $1.43 Million | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2011 | -0.30x | $-378.12K | $1.26 Million | ▼ -445.8% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $70.40K | $811.79K | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | $86.28K | $740.85K | ▲ +148.3% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $93.97K | $2.00 Million | ▼ -84.8% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $668.29K | $2.17 Million | ▲ +53.5% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $608.03K | $3.03 Million | ▲ +171.5% |
| 2005 | -0.28x | $-969.08K | $3.45 Million | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2004 | -0.54x | $-1.61 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -787.8% |
| 2003 | -0.06x | $-306.20K | $5.05 Million | — |