Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (CETY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (CETY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.61x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.66 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($7.70 Million) in one year. See Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common S (CETY) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2003–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock across 22 annual periods. Also explore Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common S equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (2003–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common Stock. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. Common S (CETY) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.54x | $-3.56 Million | $6.57 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 2023 | -0.95x | $-4.78 Million | $5.06 Million | ▼ -162.7% |
| 2022 | -0.36x | $-2.24 Million | $6.24 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2021 | -0.31x | $-2.55 Million | $8.15 Million | ▼ -148.7% |
| 2020 | -0.13x | $-1.43 Million | $11.36 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2019 | -0.23x | $-2.22 Million | $9.56 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2018 | -0.19x | $-1.44 Million | $7.61 Million | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2017 | -0.22x | $-1.50 Million | $6.89 Million | ▼ -113.4% |
| 2016 | -0.10x | $-513.19K | $5.05 Million | ▲ +25.9% |
| 2015 | -0.14x | $-617.55K | $4.50 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2014 | -0.46x | $-708.34K | $1.53 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2013 | -0.27x | $-266.04K | $1.00 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2012 | -0.22x | $-314.33K | $1.43 Million | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2011 | -0.30x | $-378.12K | $1.26 Million | ▼ -445.8% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $70.40K | $811.79K | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | $86.28K | $740.85K | ▲ +148.3% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $93.97K | $2.00 Million | ▼ -84.8% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $668.29K | $2.17 Million | ▲ +53.5% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $608.03K | $3.03 Million | ▲ +171.5% |
| 2005 | -0.28x | $-969.08K | $3.45 Million | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2004 | -0.54x | $-1.61 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -787.8% |
| 2003 | -0.06x | $-306.20K | $5.05 Million | — |