Cognyte Software Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cognyte Software Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Cognyte Software Ltd (CGNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.69 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($304.69 Million) in one year. Check Cognyte Software Ltd (CGNT) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Cognyte Software Ltd (1992–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Cognyte Software Ltd from 1992 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Cognyte Software Ltd across 33 annual periods. Check CGNT cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Cognyte Software Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2026)
Cognyte Software Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cognyte Software Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CGNT cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.14x | $40.33 Million | $292.20 Million | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2025 | 0.17x | $46.78 Million | $280.72 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $34.56 Million | $257.35 Million | ▲ +184.7% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-36.99 Million | $233.30 Million | ▼ -2303.3% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $2.63 Million | $365.52 Million | ▼ -96.4% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $71.31 Million | $358.45 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $67.19 Million | $349.94 Million | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | $53.73 Million | $330.03 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $2.31 Million | $10.71 Million | ▲ +167932.8% |
| 2015 | 0.00x | $-4.36 Million | $34.00 Billion | ▲ +99.9% |
| 2014 | -0.23x | $-5.92 Million | $25.35 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 2013 | -0.48x | $-9.65 Million | $19.97 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2012 | -0.89x | $-11.63 Million | $13.05 Million | ▼ -78.2% |
| 2011 | -0.50x | $-6.62 Million | $13.24 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2010 | -1.58x | $-8.83 Million | $5.57 Million | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2009 | -4.79x | $-14.72 Million | $3.08 Million | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2008 | -2.20x | $-9.55 Million | $4.35 Million | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2007 | -1.30x | $-3.35 Million | $2.59 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2006 | -1.80x | $-3.62 Million | $2.01 Million | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2005 | -1.21x | $-2.31 Million | $1.91 Million | ▼ -188.0% |
| 2004 | -0.42x | $-741.42K | $1.76 Million | ▲ +67.9% |
| 2003 | -1.31x | $-1.72 Million | $1.31 Million | ▼ -169.8% |
| 2002 | -0.49x | $-912.62K | $1.88 Million | ▼ -70.3% |
| 2001 | -0.29x | $-561.84K | $1.97 Million | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2000 | -0.81x | $-1.61 Million | $1.99 Million | ▼ -503.5% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | $500.00K | $2.50 Million | ▲ +130.0% |
| 1998 | -0.67x | $-1.60 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +68.0% |
| 1997 | -2.08x | $-5.00 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 1996 | -2.69x | $-7.00 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 1995 | -3.50x | $-7.00 Million | $2.00 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 1994 | -4.04x | $-9.70 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -84.5% |
| 1993 | -2.19x | $-4.60 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -119.0% |
| 1992 | -1.00x | $-1.90 Million | $1.90 Million | — |