China Natural Resources Inc (CHNR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
China Natural Resources Inc (CHNR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($160.96 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is China Natural Resources Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
China Natural Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for China Natural Resources Inc across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does China Natural Resources Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for China Natural Resources Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for China Natural Resources Inc. Check how high is China Natural Resources Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.03x | $-5.57 Million | $160.96 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-7.42 Million | $172.83 Million | ▼ -157.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $13.33 Million | $177.81 Million | ▲ +183.6% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-12.79 Million | $142.54 Million | ▼ -12.5% |
| 2021 | -0.08x | $-12.07 Million | $151.41 Million | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2020 | -0.20x | $-46.53 Million | $238.26 Million | ▼ -110.1% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-3.33 Million | $35.85 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2018 | -0.25x | $-7.53 Million | $29.54 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2017 | -0.33x | $-14.75 Million | $45.25 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2016 | -0.35x | $-28.27 Million | $81.60 Million | ▼ -94.5% |
| 2015 | -0.18x | $-11.38 Million | $63.92 Million | ▲ +83.0% |
| 2014 | -1.05x | $-60.21 Million | $57.42 Million | ▼ -1841.5% |
| 2013 | -0.05x | $-149.56 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -53.9% |
| 2012 | -0.04x | $-80.98 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2011 | -0.03x | $-62.13 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▼ -268.9% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $30.81 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +105.7% |
| 2009 | -0.36x | $-113.22 Million | $313.80 Million | ▼ -161.0% |
| 2008 | 0.59x | $68.98 Million | $116.62 Million | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2007 | 1.33x | $62.79 Million | $47.06 Million | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2006 | 2.05x | $103.15 Million | $50.22 Million | ▲ +168.7% |
| 2005 | -2.99x | $-10.76 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -229.4% |
| 2004 | -0.91x | $-3.65 Million | $4.02 Million | ▼ -226.8% |
| 2003 | 0.72x | $4.54 Million | $6.34 Million | ▲ +259.8% |
| 2002 | -0.45x | $-4.32 Million | $9.65 Million | ▼ -168.3% |
| 2001 | 0.66x | $11.56 Million | $17.64 Million | ▲ +18439.4% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $-173.62K | $48.60 Million | ▲ +99.3% |
| 1999 | -0.49x | $-41.70 Million | $85.24 Million | ▼ -204.7% |
| 1998 | 0.47x | $35.60 Million | $76.17 Million | ▲ +999.7% |
| 1997 | -0.05x | $-3.31 Million | $63.75 Million | ▼ -115.3% |
| 1996 | 0.34x | $130.28 Million | $384.22 Million | — |