ClearOne Inc (CLRO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ClearOne Inc (CLRO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.98x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.95 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($3.01 Million) in one year. See ClearOne Inc (CLRO) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
ClearOne Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for ClearOne Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore ClearOne Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for ClearOne Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ClearOne Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is ClearOne Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.50x | $-7.52 Million | $3.01 Million | ▼ -112.8% |
| 2024 | -1.17x | $-6.12 Million | $5.21 Million | ▼ -112.9% |
| 2023 | 9.09x | $54.63 Million | $6.01 Million | ▲ +2192.7% |
| 2022 | -0.43x | $-4.18 Million | $9.62 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2021 | -0.30x | $-4.39 Million | $14.69 Million | ▼ -281.1% |
| 2020 | -0.08x | $-982.00K | $12.51 Million | ▲ +82.1% |
| 2019 | -0.44x | $-4.66 Million | $10.63 Million | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2018 | -0.99x | $-6.62 Million | $6.71 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2017 | -0.82x | $-9.27 Million | $11.31 Million | ▼ -211.7% |
| 2016 | 0.73x | $7.83 Million | $10.68 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2015 | 0.69x | $7.59 Million | $10.96 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2014 | 0.52x | $6.71 Million | $12.84 Million | ▲ +156.3% |
| 2013 | -0.93x | $-9.95 Million | $10.73 Million | ▼ -153.4% |
| 2012 | 1.74x | $43.92 Million | $25.27 Million | ▲ +196.6% |
| 2011 | 0.59x | $5.80 Million | $9.89 Million | ▲ +63.6% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $4.39 Million | $12.25 Million | ▲ +3385.8% |
| 2009 | -0.01x | $-136.00K | $12.48 Million | ▼ -103.8% |
| 2008 | 0.29x | $3.52 Million | $12.16 Million | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2007 | 0.64x | $6.78 Million | $10.62 Million | ▲ +224.7% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $2.16 Million | $10.99 Million | ▲ +796.9% |
| 2005 | -0.03x | $-370.00K | $13.11 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.03x | $-370.00K | $13.11 Million | ▼ -160.3% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $1.08 Million | $23.15 Million | ▲ +292.6% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $105.09K | $8.81 Million | ▼ -99.0% |
| 2001 | 1.20x | $3.72 Million | $3.10 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2000 | 1.17x | $2.92 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 1999 | 1.29x | $4.08 Million | $3.17 Million | ▲ +91.7% |
| 1998 | 0.67x | $2.07 Million | $3.07 Million | ▲ +197.4% |
| 1997 | 0.23x | $798.53K | $3.53 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.23x | $798.53K | $3.53 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 1995 | 0.20x | $529.28K | $2.61 Million | ▲ +159.2% |
| 1994 | -0.34x | $-1.20 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -328.6% |
| 1993 | -0.08x | $-200.00K | $2.50 Million | ▲ +58.0% |
| 1992 | -0.19x | $-400.00K | $2.10 Million | — |