Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd (CLWT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.19x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $781.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.01 Million) in one year. Check Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd (CLWT) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd across 30 annual periods. Check CLWT cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.23x | $-1.09 Million | $4.75 Million | ▼ -218.3% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $781.00K | $4.01 Million | ▲ +1471.7% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-80.00K | $5.64 Million | ▼ -114.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $461.00K | $4.56 Million | ▼ -70.4% |
| 2021 | 0.34x | $2.20 Million | $6.45 Million | ▲ +194.5% |
| 2020 | -0.36x | $-2.04 Million | $5.63 Million | ▼ -834.0% |
| 2019 | -0.04x | $-266.00K | $6.88 Million | ▲ +78.4% |
| 2018 | -0.18x | $-1.34 Million | $7.52 Million | ▼ -281.9% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $652.00K | $6.63 Million | ▲ +316.9% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $153.00K | $6.49 Million | ▲ +103.8% |
| 2015 | -0.62x | $-2.97 Million | $4.81 Million | ▼ -670.9% |
| 2014 | -0.08x | $-470.00K | $5.87 Million | ▲ +81.2% |
| 2013 | -0.43x | $-2.56 Million | $6.00 Million | ▼ -209.6% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | $2.79 Million | $7.19 Million | ▲ +220.8% |
| 2011 | -0.32x | $-1.92 Million | $5.96 Million | ▼ -705.3% |
| 2010 | -0.04x | $-284.00K | $7.11 Million | ▼ -221.7% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | $240.00K | $7.31 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $644.00K | $9.30 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $449.00K | $7.52 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | $1.54 Million | $6.99 Million | ▲ +752.7% |
| 2005 | -0.03x | $-258.00K | $7.62 Million | ▼ -110.5% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | $2.54 Million | $7.86 Million | ▲ +663.8% |
| 2003 | -0.06x | $-347.00K | $6.07 Million | ▼ -485.8% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $89.00K | $6.00 Million | ▲ +227.8% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-60.00K | $5.17 Million | ▼ -107.2% |
| 2000 | 0.16x | $675.00K | $4.21 Million | ▼ -29.2% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $928.00K | $4.10 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $700.00K | $3.40 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $800.00K | $3.10 Million | ▲ +2142.4% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-70.00K | $5.54 Million | — |