Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd (CLWT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd (CLWT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.19x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $781.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.01 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd (CLWT) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Euro Tech Holdings Company Ltd. Check CLWT cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.23x | $-1.09 Million | $4.75 Million | ▼ -218.3% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $781.00K | $4.01 Million | ▲ +1471.7% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-80.00K | $5.64 Million | ▼ -114.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $461.00K | $4.56 Million | ▼ -70.4% |
| 2021 | 0.34x | $2.20 Million | $6.45 Million | ▲ +194.5% |
| 2020 | -0.36x | $-2.04 Million | $5.63 Million | ▼ -834.0% |
| 2019 | -0.04x | $-266.00K | $6.88 Million | ▲ +78.4% |
| 2018 | -0.18x | $-1.34 Million | $7.52 Million | ▼ -281.9% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $652.00K | $6.63 Million | ▲ +316.9% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $153.00K | $6.49 Million | ▲ +103.8% |
| 2015 | -0.62x | $-2.97 Million | $4.81 Million | ▼ -670.9% |
| 2014 | -0.08x | $-470.00K | $5.87 Million | ▲ +81.2% |
| 2013 | -0.43x | $-2.56 Million | $6.00 Million | ▼ -209.6% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | $2.79 Million | $7.19 Million | ▲ +220.8% |
| 2011 | -0.32x | $-1.92 Million | $5.96 Million | ▼ -705.3% |
| 2010 | -0.04x | $-284.00K | $7.11 Million | ▼ -221.7% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | $240.00K | $7.31 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $644.00K | $9.30 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $449.00K | $7.52 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | $1.54 Million | $6.99 Million | ▲ +752.7% |
| 2005 | -0.03x | $-258.00K | $7.62 Million | ▼ -110.5% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | $2.54 Million | $7.86 Million | ▲ +663.8% |
| 2003 | -0.06x | $-347.00K | $6.07 Million | ▼ -485.8% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $89.00K | $6.00 Million | ▲ +227.8% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-60.00K | $5.17 Million | ▼ -107.2% |
| 2000 | 0.16x | $675.00K | $4.21 Million | ▼ -29.2% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $928.00K | $4.10 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $700.00K | $3.40 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $800.00K | $3.10 Million | ▲ +2142.4% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-70.00K | $5.54 Million | — |