Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-166.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.34 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Columbus McKinnon Corporation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Columbus McKinnon Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Columbus McKinnon Corporation across 31 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Columbus McKinnon Corporation for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Columbus McKinnon Corporation (1996–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Columbus McKinnon Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CMCO market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.04x | $-146.21 Million | $3.34 Billion | ▼ -182.3% |
| 2025 | 0.05x | $45.61 Million | $856.69 Million | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $67.20 Million | $943.88 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $83.64 Million | $864.66 Million | ▲ +80.6% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $48.88 Million | $912.90 Million | ▼ -66.4% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $98.89 Million | $620.28 Million | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $106.80 Million | $629.69 Million | ▲ +34.5% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $79.50 Million | $630.41 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $69.66 Million | $734.22 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $60.45 Million | $772.49 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $52.65 Million | $486.74 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | $38.25 Million | $297.61 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $29.51 Million | $307.39 Million | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $42.38 Million | $326.88 Million | ▲ +95.1% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $23.59 Million | $354.94 Million | ▲ +541.7% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | $3.28 Million | $316.73 Million | ▼ -89.8% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $29.87 Million | $294.22 Million | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $60.23 Million | $309.81 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $59.59 Million | $294.55 Million | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $45.49 Million | $324.31 Million | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2006 | 0.13x | $48.52 Million | $361.62 Million | ▲ +200.8% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $17.80 Million | $399.10 Million | ▼ -30.6% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $26.37 Million | $410.38 Million | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $14.68 Million | $429.90 Million | ▼ -68.7% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $49.47 Million | $452.68 Million | ▲ +112.8% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $27.69 Million | $539.15 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $36.72 Million | $556.37 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $57.50 Million | $578.20 Million | ▲ +47.7% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | $40.20 Million | $597.20 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 1997 | 0.07x | $28.90 Million | $398.00 Million | ▼ -79.9% |
| 1996 | 0.36x | $18.50 Million | $51.10 Million | — |