Cerenome, Inc. (CNSY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cerenome, Inc. (CNSY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.83x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-7.13 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($8.57 Million) in one year. Check Cerenome, Inc. cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cerenome, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cerenome, Inc. across 27 annual periods. Check how high is Cerenome, Inc.'s earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cerenome, Inc. (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cerenome, Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Cerenome, Inc. generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.69x | $-20.77 Million | $12.33 Million | ▼ -148.8% |
| 2024 | -0.68x | $-10.55 Million | $15.58 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2023 | -1.01x | $-12.85 Million | $12.74 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2022 | -0.74x | $-12.97 Million | $17.42 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2021 | -0.92x | $-10.28 Million | $11.14 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2020 | -0.93x | $-8.43 Million | $9.07 Million | ▼ -247.3% |
| 2019 | -0.27x | $-5.91 Million | $22.07 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2018 | -0.64x | $-11.97 Million | $18.77 Million | ▲ +34.5% |
| 2017 | -0.97x | $-18.13 Million | $18.61 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2016 | -0.83x | $-19.53 Million | $23.62 Million | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2014 | -0.68x | $-30.33 Million | $44.42 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2013 | -0.89x | $-34.56 Million | $38.93 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2012 | -0.87x | $-32.19 Million | $36.80 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2011 | -0.85x | $-35.32 Million | $41.59 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2010 | -0.54x | $-23.57 Million | $43.47 Million | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2009 | -0.84x | $-23.81 Million | $28.41 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2008 | -1.00x | $-33.39 Million | $33.33 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2007 | -0.97x | $-30.00 Million | $30.91 Million | ▼ -110.1% |
| 2006 | -0.46x | $-16.48 Million | $35.68 Million | ▼ -1343.1% |
| 2005 | -0.03x | $-1.10 Million | $34.40 Million | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2004 | -1.00x | $-12.57 Million | $12.64 Million | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2003 | -0.55x | $-7.25 Million | $13.18 Million | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2002 | -0.52x | $-6.89 Million | $13.32 Million | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2001 | -1.79x | $-8.32 Million | $4.66 Million | ▼ -75.8% |
| 2000 | -1.02x | $-2.98 Million | $2.93 Million | ▼ -133.3% |
| 1999 | -0.44x | $-5.11 Million | $11.72 Million | ▲ +73.9% |
| 1998 | -1.67x | $-1.52 Million | $912.00K | — |