Cps Technologies (CPSH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cps Technologies (CPSH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -466.54x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.23 Billion could theoretically repay -467% of its total liabilities ($4.78 Million) in one year. See Cps Technologies financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cps Technologies Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cps Technologies across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Cps Technologies.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cps Technologies (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cps Technologies. Check Cps Technologies cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $243.64K | $4.88 Million | ▲ +106.3% |
| 2024 | -0.80x | $-3.48 Million | $4.36 Million | ▼ -369.0% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $1.27 Million | $4.28 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2022 | 0.59x | $3.55 Million | $5.97 Million | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2021 | 0.36x | $2.01 Million | $5.63 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 2020 | 0.85x | $1.67 Million | $1.96 Million | ▲ +348.6% |
| 2019 | -0.34x | $-1.26 Million | $3.69 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 2018 | -0.14x | $-373.56K | $2.66 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2017 | -1.05x | $-1.79 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -327.5% |
| 2016 | 0.46x | $596.30K | $1.29 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2015 | 0.61x | $1.56 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2014 | 0.53x | $1.28 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2013 | 1.07x | $2.44 Million | $2.28 Million | ▲ +425.7% |
| 2012 | -0.33x | $-926.42K | $2.82 Million | ▼ -1118.7% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $81.75K | $2.53 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 2010 | 0.75x | $1.60 Million | $2.13 Million | ▲ +677.8% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $162.27K | $1.68 Million | ▼ -92.1% |
| 2008 | 1.23x | $1.71 Million | $1.39 Million | ▲ +145.5% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | $803.23K | $1.60 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $909.64K | $2.01 Million | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $305.94K | $1.12 Million | ▼ -66.2% |
| 2004 | 0.81x | $811.61K | $1.00 Million | ▲ +391.7% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $117.66K | $715.42K | ▲ +170.0% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $44.78K | $735.21K | ▲ +141.7% |
| 2001 | -0.15x | $-115.53K | $791.30K | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2000 | -0.59x | $-385.37K | $650.80K | ▼ -188.8% |
| 1999 | 0.67x | $400.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -75.2% |
| 1998 | 2.69x | $1.60 Million | $595.16K | ▲ +1076.2% |
| 1997 | 0.23x | $784.17K | $3.42 Million | ▲ +317.7% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | $202.86K | $3.70 Million | ▲ +129.3% |
| 1995 | -0.19x | $-565.33K | $3.02 Million | ▲ +73.2% |
| 1994 | -0.70x | $-1.67 Million | $2.39 Million | — |