Cps Technologies (CPSH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cps Technologies (CPSH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-291.96K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.70 Million) in one year. Check Cps Technologies investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cps Technologies Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cps Technologies across 32 annual periods. Also explore CPSH asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cps Technologies (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cps Technologies. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Cps Technologies market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $243.64K | $4.88 Million | ▲ +106.3% |
| 2024 | -0.80x | $-3.48 Million | $4.36 Million | ▼ -369.0% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $1.27 Million | $4.28 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2022 | 0.59x | $3.55 Million | $5.97 Million | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2021 | 0.36x | $2.01 Million | $5.63 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 2020 | 0.85x | $1.67 Million | $1.96 Million | ▲ +348.6% |
| 2019 | -0.34x | $-1.26 Million | $3.69 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 2018 | -0.14x | $-373.56K | $2.66 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2017 | -1.05x | $-1.79 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -327.5% |
| 2016 | 0.46x | $596.30K | $1.29 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2015 | 0.61x | $1.56 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2014 | 0.53x | $1.28 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2013 | 1.07x | $2.44 Million | $2.28 Million | ▲ +425.7% |
| 2012 | -0.33x | $-926.42K | $2.82 Million | ▼ -1118.7% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $81.75K | $2.53 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 2010 | 0.75x | $1.60 Million | $2.13 Million | ▲ +677.8% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $162.27K | $1.68 Million | ▼ -92.1% |
| 2008 | 1.23x | $1.71 Million | $1.39 Million | ▲ +145.5% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | $803.23K | $1.60 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $909.64K | $2.01 Million | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $305.94K | $1.12 Million | ▼ -66.2% |
| 2004 | 0.81x | $811.61K | $1.00 Million | ▲ +391.7% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $117.66K | $715.42K | ▲ +170.0% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $44.78K | $735.21K | ▲ +141.7% |
| 2001 | -0.15x | $-115.53K | $791.30K | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2000 | -0.59x | $-385.37K | $650.80K | ▼ -188.8% |
| 1999 | 0.67x | $400.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -75.2% |
| 1998 | 2.69x | $1.60 Million | $595.16K | ▲ +1076.2% |
| 1997 | 0.23x | $784.17K | $3.42 Million | ▲ +317.7% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | $202.86K | $3.70 Million | ▲ +129.3% |
| 1995 | -0.19x | $-565.33K | $3.02 Million | ▲ +73.2% |
| 1994 | -0.70x | $-1.67 Million | $2.39 Million | — |