Cps Technologies Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cps Technologies cash flow-to-debt ratio. Cps Technologies (CPSH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -466.54x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.23 Billion could theoretically repay -467% of its total liabilities ($4.78 Million) in one year. Check Cps Technologies (CPSH) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Cps Technologies (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Cps Technologies from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Cps Technologies across 32 annual periods. Check Cps Technologies (CPSH) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Cps Technologies Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Cps Technologies cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cps Technologies. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CPSH operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $243.64K | $4.88 Million | ▲ +106.3% |
| 2024 | -0.80x | $-3.48 Million | $4.36 Million | ▼ -369.0% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $1.27 Million | $4.28 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2022 | 0.59x | $3.55 Million | $5.97 Million | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2021 | 0.36x | $2.01 Million | $5.63 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 2020 | 0.85x | $1.67 Million | $1.96 Million | ▲ +348.6% |
| 2019 | -0.34x | $-1.26 Million | $3.69 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 2018 | -0.14x | $-373.56K | $2.66 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2017 | -1.05x | $-1.79 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -327.5% |
| 2016 | 0.46x | $596.30K | $1.29 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2015 | 0.61x | $1.56 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2014 | 0.53x | $1.28 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2013 | 1.07x | $2.44 Million | $2.28 Million | ▲ +425.7% |
| 2012 | -0.33x | $-926.42K | $2.82 Million | ▼ -1118.7% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $81.75K | $2.53 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 2010 | 0.75x | $1.60 Million | $2.13 Million | ▲ +677.8% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $162.27K | $1.68 Million | ▼ -92.1% |
| 2008 | 1.23x | $1.71 Million | $1.39 Million | ▲ +145.5% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | $803.23K | $1.60 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $909.64K | $2.01 Million | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $305.94K | $1.12 Million | ▼ -66.2% |
| 2004 | 0.81x | $811.61K | $1.00 Million | ▲ +391.7% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $117.66K | $715.42K | ▲ +170.0% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $44.78K | $735.21K | ▲ +141.7% |
| 2001 | -0.15x | $-115.53K | $791.30K | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2000 | -0.59x | $-385.37K | $650.80K | ▼ -188.8% |
| 1999 | 0.67x | $400.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -75.2% |
| 1998 | 2.69x | $1.60 Million | $595.16K | ▲ +1076.2% |
| 1997 | 0.23x | $784.17K | $3.42 Million | ▲ +317.7% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | $202.86K | $3.70 Million | ▲ +129.3% |
| 1995 | -0.19x | $-565.33K | $3.02 Million | ▲ +73.2% |
| 1994 | -0.70x | $-1.67 Million | $2.39 Million | — |