Cps Technologies (CPSH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cps Technologies (CPSH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-203.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.70 Million) in one year. See CPSH free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cps Technologies Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cps Technologies across 32 annual periods. Also explore CPSH net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cps Technologies (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cps Technologies. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Cps Technologies (CPSH) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 49963.25x | $243.64 Billion | $4.88 Million | ▲ +6273245.6% |
| 2024 | -0.80x | $-3.48 Million | $4.36 Million | ▼ -369.0% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $1.27 Million | $4.28 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2022 | 0.59x | $3.55 Million | $5.97 Million | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2021 | 0.36x | $2.01 Million | $5.63 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 2020 | 0.85x | $1.67 Million | $1.96 Million | ▲ +348.6% |
| 2019 | -0.34x | $-1.26 Million | $3.69 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 2018 | -0.14x | $-373.56K | $2.66 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2017 | -1.05x | $-1.79 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -327.5% |
| 2016 | 0.46x | $596.30K | $1.29 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2015 | 0.61x | $1.56 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2014 | 0.53x | $1.28 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2013 | 1.07x | $2.44 Million | $2.28 Million | ▲ +425.7% |
| 2012 | -0.33x | $-926.42K | $2.82 Million | ▼ -1118.7% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $81.75K | $2.53 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 2010 | 0.75x | $1.60 Million | $2.13 Million | ▲ +677.8% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $162.27K | $1.68 Million | ▼ -92.1% |
| 2008 | 1.23x | $1.71 Million | $1.39 Million | ▲ +145.5% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | $803.23K | $1.60 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $909.64K | $2.01 Million | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $305.94K | $1.12 Million | ▼ -66.2% |
| 2004 | 0.81x | $811.61K | $1.00 Million | ▲ +391.7% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $117.66K | $715.42K | ▲ +170.0% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $44.78K | $735.21K | ▲ +141.7% |
| 2001 | -0.15x | $-115.53K | $791.30K | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2000 | -0.59x | $-385.37K | $650.80K | ▼ -188.8% |
| 1999 | 0.67x | $400.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -75.2% |
| 1998 | 2.69x | $1.60 Million | $595.16K | ▲ +1076.2% |
| 1997 | 0.23x | $784.17K | $3.42 Million | ▲ +317.7% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | $202.86K | $3.70 Million | ▲ +129.3% |
| 1995 | -0.19x | $-565.33K | $3.02 Million | ▲ +73.2% |
| 1994 | -0.70x | $-1.67 Million | $2.39 Million | — |