Cantaloupe Inc (CTLP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cantaloupe Inc (CTLP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($126.77 Million) in one year. See CTLP free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cantaloupe Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cantaloupe Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore CTLP shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cantaloupe Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cantaloupe Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CTLP market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.16x | $20.34 Million | $128.11 Million | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | $27.75 Million | $151.10 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $14.19 Million | $122.02 Million | ▲ +227.8% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-8.71 Million | $95.66 Million | ▼ -192.5% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $8.18 Million | $83.14 Million | ▲ +155.4% |
| 2020 | -0.18x | $-14.14 Million | $79.67 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2019 | -0.44x | $-28.70 Million | $65.51 Million | ▼ -403.7% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $12.43 Million | $86.17 Million | ▲ +168.0% |
| 2017 | -0.21x | $-6.77 Million | $31.91 Million | ▼ -197.8% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $6.47 Million | $29.81 Million | ▲ +356.6% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | $-1.70 Million | $20.07 Million | ▼ -120.3% |
| 2014 | 0.42x | $7.09 Million | $17.03 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2013 | 0.46x | $6.04 Million | $13.20 Million | ▲ +6664.1% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $78.24K | $11.56 Million | ▲ +101.3% |
| 2011 | -0.52x | $-5.17 Million | $9.88 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2010 | -1.75x | $-12.35 Million | $7.04 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2009 | -1.41x | $-8.48 Million | $6.01 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2008 | -1.82x | $-13.59 Million | $7.48 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2007 | -2.13x | $-13.68 Million | $6.41 Million | ▼ -135.8% |
| 2006 | -0.91x | $-11.08 Million | $12.24 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2005 | -0.85x | $-11.90 Million | $14.08 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2004 | -1.07x | $-12.56 Million | $11.77 Million | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2003 | -0.65x | $-9.23 Million | $14.20 Million | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2002 | -0.45x | $-6.13 Million | $13.66 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2001 | -0.42x | $-3.57 Million | $8.58 Million | ▲ +66.2% |
| 2000 | -1.23x | $-5.74 Million | $4.66 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 1999 | -0.92x | $-3.94 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 1998 | -2.50x | $-2.58 Million | $1.03 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 1997 | -4.70x | $-2.65 Million | $564.14K | ▲ +23.9% |
| 1996 | -6.18x | $-2.39 Million | $387.18K | — |