Cantaloupe Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cantaloupe Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Cantaloupe Inc (CTLP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($126.77 Million) in one year. Check CTLP total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Cantaloupe Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Cantaloupe Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Cantaloupe Inc across 30 annual periods. Check CTLP cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Cantaloupe Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Cantaloupe Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cantaloupe Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Cantaloupe Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.16x | $20.34 Million | $128.11 Million | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | $27.75 Million | $151.10 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $14.19 Million | $122.02 Million | ▲ +227.8% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-8.71 Million | $95.66 Million | ▼ -192.5% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $8.18 Million | $83.14 Million | ▲ +155.4% |
| 2020 | -0.18x | $-14.14 Million | $79.67 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2019 | -0.44x | $-28.70 Million | $65.51 Million | ▼ -403.7% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $12.43 Million | $86.17 Million | ▲ +168.0% |
| 2017 | -0.21x | $-6.77 Million | $31.91 Million | ▼ -197.8% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $6.47 Million | $29.81 Million | ▲ +356.6% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | $-1.70 Million | $20.07 Million | ▼ -120.3% |
| 2014 | 0.42x | $7.09 Million | $17.03 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2013 | 0.46x | $6.04 Million | $13.20 Million | ▲ +6664.1% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $78.24K | $11.56 Million | ▲ +101.3% |
| 2011 | -0.52x | $-5.17 Million | $9.88 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2010 | -1.75x | $-12.35 Million | $7.04 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2009 | -1.41x | $-8.48 Million | $6.01 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2008 | -1.82x | $-13.59 Million | $7.48 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2007 | -2.13x | $-13.68 Million | $6.41 Million | ▼ -135.8% |
| 2006 | -0.91x | $-11.08 Million | $12.24 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2005 | -0.85x | $-11.90 Million | $14.08 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2004 | -1.07x | $-12.56 Million | $11.77 Million | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2003 | -0.65x | $-9.23 Million | $14.20 Million | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2002 | -0.45x | $-6.13 Million | $13.66 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2001 | -0.42x | $-3.57 Million | $8.58 Million | ▲ +66.2% |
| 2000 | -1.23x | $-5.74 Million | $4.66 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 1999 | -0.92x | $-3.94 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 1998 | -2.50x | $-2.58 Million | $1.03 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 1997 | -4.70x | $-2.65 Million | $564.14K | ▲ +23.9% |
| 1996 | -6.18x | $-2.39 Million | $387.18K | — |