Cantaloupe Inc (CTLP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cantaloupe Inc (CTLP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($126.77 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Cantaloupe Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cantaloupe Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cantaloupe Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore Cantaloupe Inc (CTLP) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cantaloupe Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cantaloupe Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CTLP market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.16x | $20.34 Million | $128.11 Million | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | $27.75 Million | $151.10 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $14.19 Million | $122.02 Million | ▲ +227.8% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-8.71 Million | $95.66 Million | ▼ -192.5% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $8.18 Million | $83.14 Million | ▲ +155.4% |
| 2020 | -0.18x | $-14.14 Million | $79.67 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2019 | -0.44x | $-28.70 Million | $65.51 Million | ▼ -403.7% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $12.43 Million | $86.17 Million | ▲ +168.0% |
| 2017 | -0.21x | $-6.77 Million | $31.91 Million | ▼ -197.8% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $6.47 Million | $29.81 Million | ▲ +356.6% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | $-1.70 Million | $20.07 Million | ▼ -120.3% |
| 2014 | 0.42x | $7.09 Million | $17.03 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2013 | 0.46x | $6.04 Million | $13.20 Million | ▲ +6664.1% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $78.24K | $11.56 Million | ▲ +101.3% |
| 2011 | -0.52x | $-5.17 Million | $9.88 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2010 | -1.75x | $-12.35 Million | $7.04 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2009 | -1.41x | $-8.48 Million | $6.01 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2008 | -1.82x | $-13.59 Million | $7.48 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2007 | -2.13x | $-13.68 Million | $6.41 Million | ▼ -135.8% |
| 2006 | -0.91x | $-11.08 Million | $12.24 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2005 | -0.85x | $-11.90 Million | $14.08 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2004 | -1.07x | $-12.56 Million | $11.77 Million | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2003 | -0.65x | $-9.23 Million | $14.20 Million | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2002 | -0.45x | $-6.13 Million | $13.66 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2001 | -0.42x | $-3.57 Million | $8.58 Million | ▲ +66.2% |
| 2000 | -1.23x | $-5.74 Million | $4.66 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 1999 | -0.92x | $-3.94 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 1998 | -2.50x | $-2.58 Million | $1.03 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 1997 | -4.70x | $-2.65 Million | $564.14K | ▲ +23.9% |
| 1996 | -6.18x | $-2.39 Million | $387.18K | — |