Calavo Growers Inc (CVGW) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Calavo Growers Inc (CVGW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-8.66 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($90.84 Million) in one year. See Calavo Growers Inc (CVGW) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Calavo Growers Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Calavo Growers Inc across 26 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Calavo Growers Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Calavo Growers Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Calavo Growers Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Calavo Growers Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | $21.54 Million | $83.69 Million | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $24.42 Million | $99.34 Million | ▲ +400.1% |
| 2023 | -0.08x | $-14.47 Million | $176.62 Million | ▼ -126.5% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | $50.23 Million | $162.38 Million | ▲ +398.1% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $13.57 Million | $218.52 Million | ▼ -62.7% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $28.88 Million | $173.62 Million | ▼ -75.9% |
| 2019 | 0.69x | $72.10 Million | $104.49 Million | ▲ +46.4% |
| 2018 | 0.47x | $48.43 Million | $102.78 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2017 | 0.52x | $62.14 Million | $120.00 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2016 | 0.55x | $61.97 Million | $112.86 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2015 | 0.38x | $37.28 Million | $98.96 Million | ▲ +83.3% |
| 2014 | 0.21x | $21.34 Million | $103.85 Million | ▲ +67.0% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $13.72 Million | $111.49 Million | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $21.72 Million | $97.87 Million | ▲ +151.4% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $7.87 Million | $89.08 Million | ▼ -70.2% |
| 2010 | 0.30x | $18.20 Million | $61.37 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2009 | 0.41x | $22.00 Million | $54.23 Million | ▲ +429.7% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $5.30 Million | $69.17 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2007 | 0.09x | $4.63 Million | $54.02 Million | ▼ -46.8% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $7.82 Million | $48.55 Million | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $5.57 Million | $43.74 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | $4.46 Million | $23.46 Million | ▼ -79.3% |
| 2003 | 0.92x | $15.22 Million | $16.54 Million | ▲ +178.0% |
| 2002 | 0.33x | $8.13 Million | $24.58 Million | ▲ +822.0% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $1.16 Million | $32.34 Million | ▼ -95.4% |
| 2000 | 0.77x | $2.96 Million | $3.82 Million | — |