CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $397.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.78 Million) in one year. See financial agility of CVD Equipment Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CVD Equipment Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CVD Equipment Corporation across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CVD Equipment Corporation cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CVD Equipment Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CVD Equipment Corporation. Check CVD Equipment Corporation cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.17x | $-3.68 Million | $3.14 Million | ▼ -396.9% |
| 2024 | -0.24x | $-1.49 Million | $6.32 Million | ▼ -909.3% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-206.00K | $8.82 Million | ▼ -202.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $194.00K | $8.51 Million | ▲ +103.4% |
| 2021 | -0.67x | $-4.27 Million | $6.34 Million | ▼ -900.8% |
| 2020 | -0.07x | $-1.13 Million | $16.81 Million | ▼ -297.9% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $570.71K | $16.77 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $506.54K | $16.12 Million | ▲ +124.2% |
| 2017 | -0.13x | $-2.38 Million | $18.32 Million | ▼ -116.6% |
| 2016 | 0.78x | $8.85 Million | $11.29 Million | ▲ +230.8% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $1.87 Million | $7.91 Million | ▲ +149.8% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $1.55 Million | $16.29 Million | ▲ +171.3% |
| 2013 | -0.13x | $-1.07 Million | $8.02 Million | ▼ -731.5% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-182.16K | $11.38 Million | ▼ -103.2% |
| 2011 | 0.50x | $4.19 Million | $8.36 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | $3.81 Million | $8.11 Million | ▲ +243.3% |
| 2009 | -0.33x | $-2.02 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -269.4% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $1.96 Million | $10.14 Million | ▲ +357.0% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $204.38K | $4.83 Million | ▲ +243.1% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $70.54K | $5.72 Million | ▼ -95.9% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $1.40 Million | $4.67 Million | ▲ +320.6% |
| 2004 | -0.14x | $-792.38K | $5.85 Million | ▼ -207.3% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $592.48K | $4.70 Million | ▲ +166.1% |
| 2002 | -0.19x | $-1.04 Million | $5.46 Million | ▼ -118.7% |
| 2001 | 1.02x | $1.80 Million | $1.76 Million | ▲ +432.1% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $463.23K | $2.42 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $218.89K | $1.52 Million | ▲ +171.2% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $31.16K | $586.17K | ▼ -96.9% |
| 1997 | 1.71x | $437.55K | $255.53K | ▲ +52.0% |
| 1996 | 1.13x | $530.20K | $470.53K | — |