CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $397.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.78 Million) in one year. Check CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CVD Equipment Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CVD Equipment Corporation across 30 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of CVD Equipment Corporation for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CVD Equipment Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CVD Equipment Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CVV stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.17x | $-3.68 Million | $3.14 Million | ▼ -396.9% |
| 2024 | -0.24x | $-1.49 Million | $6.32 Million | ▼ -909.3% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-206.00K | $8.82 Million | ▼ -202.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $194.00K | $8.51 Million | ▲ +103.4% |
| 2021 | -0.67x | $-4.27 Million | $6.34 Million | ▼ -900.8% |
| 2020 | -0.07x | $-1.13 Million | $16.81 Million | ▼ -297.9% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $570.71K | $16.77 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $506.54K | $16.12 Million | ▲ +124.2% |
| 2017 | -0.13x | $-2.38 Million | $18.32 Million | ▼ -116.6% |
| 2016 | 0.78x | $8.85 Million | $11.29 Million | ▲ +230.8% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $1.87 Million | $7.91 Million | ▲ +149.8% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $1.55 Million | $16.29 Million | ▲ +171.3% |
| 2013 | -0.13x | $-1.07 Million | $8.02 Million | ▼ -731.5% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-182.16K | $11.38 Million | ▼ -103.2% |
| 2011 | 0.50x | $4.19 Million | $8.36 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | $3.81 Million | $8.11 Million | ▲ +243.3% |
| 2009 | -0.33x | $-2.02 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -269.4% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $1.96 Million | $10.14 Million | ▲ +357.0% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $204.38K | $4.83 Million | ▲ +243.1% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $70.54K | $5.72 Million | ▼ -95.9% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $1.40 Million | $4.67 Million | ▲ +320.6% |
| 2004 | -0.14x | $-792.38K | $5.85 Million | ▼ -207.3% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $592.48K | $4.70 Million | ▲ +166.1% |
| 2002 | -0.19x | $-1.04 Million | $5.46 Million | ▼ -118.7% |
| 2001 | 1.02x | $1.80 Million | $1.76 Million | ▲ +432.1% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $463.23K | $2.42 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $218.89K | $1.52 Million | ▲ +171.2% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $31.16K | $586.17K | ▼ -96.9% |
| 1997 | 1.71x | $437.55K | $255.53K | ▲ +52.0% |
| 1996 | 1.13x | $530.20K | $470.53K | — |