CVD Equipment Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CVD Equipment Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $397.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.78 Million) in one year. Check CVD Equipment Corporation cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of CVD Equipment Corporation (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of CVD Equipment Corporation from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for CVD Equipment Corporation across 30 annual periods. Check CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CVD Equipment Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
CVD Equipment Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CVD Equipment Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CVV operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.17x | $-3.68 Million | $3.14 Million | ▼ -396.9% |
| 2024 | -0.24x | $-1.49 Million | $6.32 Million | ▼ -909.3% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-206.00K | $8.82 Million | ▼ -202.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $194.00K | $8.51 Million | ▲ +103.4% |
| 2021 | -0.67x | $-4.27 Million | $6.34 Million | ▼ -900.8% |
| 2020 | -0.07x | $-1.13 Million | $16.81 Million | ▼ -297.9% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $570.71K | $16.77 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $506.54K | $16.12 Million | ▲ +124.2% |
| 2017 | -0.13x | $-2.38 Million | $18.32 Million | ▼ -116.6% |
| 2016 | 0.78x | $8.85 Million | $11.29 Million | ▲ +230.8% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $1.87 Million | $7.91 Million | ▲ +149.8% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $1.55 Million | $16.29 Million | ▲ +171.3% |
| 2013 | -0.13x | $-1.07 Million | $8.02 Million | ▼ -731.5% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-182.16K | $11.38 Million | ▼ -103.2% |
| 2011 | 0.50x | $4.19 Million | $8.36 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | $3.81 Million | $8.11 Million | ▲ +243.3% |
| 2009 | -0.33x | $-2.02 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -269.4% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $1.96 Million | $10.14 Million | ▲ +357.0% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $204.38K | $4.83 Million | ▲ +243.1% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $70.54K | $5.72 Million | ▼ -95.9% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $1.40 Million | $4.67 Million | ▲ +320.6% |
| 2004 | -0.14x | $-792.38K | $5.85 Million | ▼ -207.3% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $592.48K | $4.70 Million | ▲ +166.1% |
| 2002 | -0.19x | $-1.04 Million | $5.46 Million | ▼ -118.7% |
| 2001 | 1.02x | $1.80 Million | $1.76 Million | ▲ +432.1% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $463.23K | $2.42 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $218.89K | $1.52 Million | ▲ +171.2% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $31.16K | $586.17K | ▼ -96.9% |
| 1997 | 1.71x | $437.55K | $255.53K | ▲ +52.0% |
| 1996 | 1.13x | $530.20K | $470.53K | — |