CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $397.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.78 Million) in one year. See CVV FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CVD Equipment Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CVD Equipment Corporation across 30 annual periods. Also explore CVV net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CVD Equipment Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CVD Equipment Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.17x | $-3.68 Million | $3.14 Million | ▼ -396.9% |
| 2024 | -0.24x | $-1.49 Million | $6.32 Million | ▼ -909.3% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-206.00K | $8.82 Million | ▼ -202.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $194.00K | $8.51 Million | ▲ +103.4% |
| 2021 | -0.67x | $-4.27 Million | $6.34 Million | ▼ -900.8% |
| 2020 | -0.07x | $-1.13 Million | $16.81 Million | ▼ -297.9% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $570.71K | $16.77 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $506.54K | $16.12 Million | ▲ +124.2% |
| 2017 | -0.13x | $-2.38 Million | $18.32 Million | ▼ -116.6% |
| 2016 | 0.78x | $8.85 Million | $11.29 Million | ▲ +230.8% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $1.87 Million | $7.91 Million | ▲ +149.8% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $1.55 Million | $16.29 Million | ▲ +171.3% |
| 2013 | -0.13x | $-1.07 Million | $8.02 Million | ▼ -731.5% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-182.16K | $11.38 Million | ▼ -103.2% |
| 2011 | 0.50x | $4.19 Million | $8.36 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | $3.81 Million | $8.11 Million | ▲ +243.3% |
| 2009 | -0.33x | $-2.02 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -269.4% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $1.96 Million | $10.14 Million | ▲ +357.0% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $204.38K | $4.83 Million | ▲ +243.1% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $70.54K | $5.72 Million | ▼ -95.9% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $1.40 Million | $4.67 Million | ▲ +320.6% |
| 2004 | -0.14x | $-792.38K | $5.85 Million | ▼ -207.3% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $592.48K | $4.70 Million | ▲ +166.1% |
| 2002 | -0.19x | $-1.04 Million | $5.46 Million | ▼ -118.7% |
| 2001 | 1.02x | $1.80 Million | $1.76 Million | ▲ +432.1% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $463.23K | $2.42 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $218.89K | $1.52 Million | ▲ +171.2% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $31.16K | $586.17K | ▼ -96.9% |
| 1997 | 1.71x | $437.55K | $255.53K | ▲ +52.0% |
| 1996 | 1.13x | $530.20K | $470.53K | — |