Consolidated Water Co Ltd (CWCO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Consolidated Water Co Ltd (CWCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.50x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $15.41 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($31.03 Million) in one year. See CWCO FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Consolidated Water Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Consolidated Water Co Ltd across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Consolidated Water Co Ltd cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Consolidated Water Co Ltd (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Consolidated Water Co Ltd. Check CWCO cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.30x | $36.52 Million | $28.00 Million | ▲ +335.3% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $7.97 Million | $26.61 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2022 | 0.85x | $21.33 Million | $25.24 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2021 | 0.65x | $6.97 Million | $10.69 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2020 | 1.64x | $17.34 Million | $10.54 Million | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2019 | 1.06x | $15.20 Million | $14.34 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2018 | 1.03x | $9.05 Million | $8.76 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2017 | 1.44x | $13.64 Million | $9.46 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2016 | 0.82x | $7.82 Million | $9.50 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2015 | 1.29x | $17.32 Million | $13.42 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2014 | 1.18x | $19.28 Million | $16.38 Million | ▲ +221.3% |
| 2013 | 0.37x | $8.74 Million | $23.87 Million | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2012 | 0.81x | $11.54 Million | $14.31 Million | ▲ +191.9% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $8.45 Million | $30.58 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $6.10 Million | $24.22 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2009 | 0.53x | $15.47 Million | $28.93 Million | ▲ +111.6% |
| 2008 | 0.25x | $7.86 Million | $31.11 Million | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $9.21 Million | $29.03 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2006 | 0.37x | $11.57 Million | $31.62 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2005 | 0.28x | $7.82 Million | $27.97 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2004 | 0.36x | $7.83 Million | $21.59 Million | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | $6.51 Million | $23.51 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2002 | 0.90x | $4.33 Million | $4.81 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2001 | 1.21x | $4.19 Million | $3.46 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2000 | 0.98x | $3.92 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 1999 | 0.59x | $2.53 Million | $4.32 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 1998 | 0.53x | $2.30 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 1997 | 0.39x | $1.80 Million | $4.60 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $1.80 Million | $5.20 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 1995 | 0.21x | $1.40 Million | $6.80 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $1.30 Million | $5.90 Million | ▲ +1.7% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $1.30 Million | $6.00 Million | — |