Consolidated Water Co Ltd (CWCO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Consolidated Water Co Ltd (CWCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.50x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $15.41 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($31.03 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Consolidated Water Co Ltd to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Consolidated Water Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Consolidated Water Co Ltd across 32 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Consolidated Water Co Ltd for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Consolidated Water Co Ltd (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Consolidated Water Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Consolidated Water Co Ltd (CWCO) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.30x | $36.52 Million | $28.00 Million | ▲ +335.3% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $7.97 Million | $26.61 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2022 | 0.85x | $21.33 Million | $25.24 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2021 | 0.65x | $6.97 Million | $10.69 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2020 | 1.64x | $17.34 Million | $10.54 Million | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2019 | 1.06x | $15.20 Million | $14.34 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2018 | 1.03x | $9.05 Million | $8.76 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2017 | 1.44x | $13.64 Million | $9.46 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2016 | 0.82x | $7.82 Million | $9.50 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2015 | 1.29x | $17.32 Million | $13.42 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2014 | 1.18x | $19.28 Million | $16.38 Million | ▲ +221.3% |
| 2013 | 0.37x | $8.74 Million | $23.87 Million | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2012 | 0.81x | $11.54 Million | $14.31 Million | ▲ +191.9% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $8.45 Million | $30.58 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $6.10 Million | $24.22 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2009 | 0.53x | $15.47 Million | $28.93 Million | ▲ +111.6% |
| 2008 | 0.25x | $7.86 Million | $31.11 Million | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $9.21 Million | $29.03 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2006 | 0.37x | $11.57 Million | $31.62 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2005 | 0.28x | $7.82 Million | $27.97 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2004 | 0.36x | $7.83 Million | $21.59 Million | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | $6.51 Million | $23.51 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2002 | 0.90x | $4.33 Million | $4.81 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2001 | 1.21x | $4.19 Million | $3.46 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2000 | 0.98x | $3.92 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 1999 | 0.59x | $2.53 Million | $4.32 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 1998 | 0.53x | $2.30 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 1997 | 0.39x | $1.80 Million | $4.60 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $1.80 Million | $5.20 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 1995 | 0.21x | $1.40 Million | $6.80 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $1.30 Million | $5.90 Million | ▲ +1.7% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $1.30 Million | $6.00 Million | — |