Consolidated Water Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Consolidated Water Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Consolidated Water Co Ltd (CWCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.50x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $15.41 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($31.03 Million) in one year. Check Consolidated Water Co Ltd total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Consolidated Water Co Ltd (1993–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Consolidated Water Co Ltd from 1993 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Consolidated Water Co Ltd across 32 annual periods. Check CWCO cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Consolidated Water Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2024)
Consolidated Water Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Consolidated Water Co Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Consolidated Water Co Ltd cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.30x | $36.52 Million | $28.00 Million | ▲ +335.3% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $7.97 Million | $26.61 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2022 | 0.85x | $21.33 Million | $25.24 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2021 | 0.65x | $6.97 Million | $10.69 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2020 | 1.64x | $17.34 Million | $10.54 Million | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2019 | 1.06x | $15.20 Million | $14.34 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2018 | 1.03x | $9.05 Million | $8.76 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2017 | 1.44x | $13.64 Million | $9.46 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2016 | 0.82x | $7.82 Million | $9.50 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2015 | 1.29x | $17.32 Million | $13.42 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2014 | 1.18x | $19.28 Million | $16.38 Million | ▲ +221.3% |
| 2013 | 0.37x | $8.74 Million | $23.87 Million | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2012 | 0.81x | $11.54 Million | $14.31 Million | ▲ +191.9% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $8.45 Million | $30.58 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $6.10 Million | $24.22 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2009 | 0.53x | $15.47 Million | $28.93 Million | ▲ +111.6% |
| 2008 | 0.25x | $7.86 Million | $31.11 Million | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $9.21 Million | $29.03 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2006 | 0.37x | $11.57 Million | $31.62 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2005 | 0.28x | $7.82 Million | $27.97 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2004 | 0.36x | $7.83 Million | $21.59 Million | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | $6.51 Million | $23.51 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2002 | 0.90x | $4.33 Million | $4.81 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2001 | 1.21x | $4.19 Million | $3.46 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2000 | 0.98x | $3.92 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 1999 | 0.59x | $2.53 Million | $4.32 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 1998 | 0.53x | $2.30 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 1997 | 0.39x | $1.80 Million | $4.60 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $1.80 Million | $5.20 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 1995 | 0.21x | $1.40 Million | $6.80 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $1.30 Million | $5.90 Million | ▲ +1.7% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $1.30 Million | $6.00 Million | — |