Consolidated Water Co Ltd (CWCO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Consolidated Water Co Ltd (CWCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.50x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $15.41 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($31.03 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Consolidated Water Co Ltd to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Consolidated Water Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Consolidated Water Co Ltd across 32 annual periods. Also explore CWCO shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Consolidated Water Co Ltd (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Consolidated Water Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Consolidated Water Co Ltd (CWCO) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.30x | $36.52 Million | $28.00 Million | ▲ +335.3% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $7.97 Million | $26.61 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2022 | 0.85x | $21.33 Million | $25.24 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2021 | 0.65x | $6.97 Million | $10.69 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2020 | 1.64x | $17.34 Million | $10.54 Million | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2019 | 1.06x | $15.20 Million | $14.34 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2018 | 1.03x | $9.05 Million | $8.76 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2017 | 1.44x | $13.64 Million | $9.46 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2016 | 0.82x | $7.82 Million | $9.50 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2015 | 1.29x | $17.32 Million | $13.42 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2014 | 1.18x | $19.28 Million | $16.38 Million | ▲ +221.3% |
| 2013 | 0.37x | $8.74 Million | $23.87 Million | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2012 | 0.81x | $11.54 Million | $14.31 Million | ▲ +191.9% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $8.45 Million | $30.58 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $6.10 Million | $24.22 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2009 | 0.53x | $15.47 Million | $28.93 Million | ▲ +111.6% |
| 2008 | 0.25x | $7.86 Million | $31.11 Million | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $9.21 Million | $29.03 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2006 | 0.37x | $11.57 Million | $31.62 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2005 | 0.28x | $7.82 Million | $27.97 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2004 | 0.36x | $7.83 Million | $21.59 Million | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | $6.51 Million | $23.51 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2002 | 0.90x | $4.33 Million | $4.81 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2001 | 1.21x | $4.19 Million | $3.46 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2000 | 0.98x | $3.92 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 1999 | 0.59x | $2.53 Million | $4.32 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 1998 | 0.53x | $2.30 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 1997 | 0.39x | $1.80 Million | $4.60 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $1.80 Million | $5.20 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 1995 | 0.21x | $1.40 Million | $6.80 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $1.30 Million | $5.90 Million | ▲ +1.7% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $1.30 Million | $6.00 Million | — |