Casella Waste Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Casella Waste Systems Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Casella Waste Systems Inc (CWST) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $98.77 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.98 Billion) in one year. Check CWST cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Casella Waste Systems Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Casella Waste Systems Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Casella Waste Systems Inc across 30 annual periods. Check cash flow quality index of Casella Waste Systems Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Casella Waste Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Casella Waste Systems Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Casella Waste Systems Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CWST cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $329.78 Million | $1.84 Billion | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $281.36 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $233.09 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $217.31 Million | $951.32 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $182.74 Million | $861.12 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $139.92 Million | $831.76 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $116.83 Million | $809.43 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | $120.83 Million | $748.24 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $107.54 Million | $652.81 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $80.43 Million | $656.06 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $70.51 Million | $655.27 Million | ▲ +91.7% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $38.29 Million | $682.05 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $38.29 Million | $681.82 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $43.86 Million | $644.18 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $43.86 Million | $644.18 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $63.77 Million | $615.51 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $47.09 Million | $596.59 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $69.27 Million | $704.52 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $72.22 Million | $711.40 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $71.81 Million | $711.40 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $81.45 Million | $703.07 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $75.50 Million | $591.19 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $83.03 Million | $505.71 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $61.90 Million | $443.72 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | $51.01 Million | $426.31 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $41.59 Million | $560.74 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $38.10 Million | $488.00 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 1998 | 0.32x | $38.10 Million | $119.80 Million | ▲ +64.9% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $19.40 Million | $100.60 Million | ▲ +33.5% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | $14.70 Million | $101.80 Million | — |