Casella Waste Systems Inc (CWST) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Casella Waste Systems Inc (CWST) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $62.25 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.70 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Casella Waste Systems Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Casella Waste Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Casella Waste Systems Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore CWST total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Casella Waste Systems Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Casella Waste Systems Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Casella Waste Systems Inc (CWST) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $329.78 Million | $1.84 Billion | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $281.36 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $233.09 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $217.31 Million | $951.32 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $182.74 Million | $861.12 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $139.92 Million | $831.76 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $116.83 Million | $809.43 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | $120.83 Million | $748.24 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $107.54 Million | $652.81 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $80.43 Million | $656.06 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $70.51 Million | $655.27 Million | ▲ +91.7% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $38.29 Million | $682.05 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $38.29 Million | $681.82 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $43.86 Million | $644.18 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $43.86 Million | $644.18 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $63.77 Million | $615.51 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $47.09 Million | $596.59 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $69.27 Million | $704.52 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $72.22 Million | $711.40 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $71.81 Million | $711.40 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $81.45 Million | $703.07 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $75.50 Million | $591.19 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $83.03 Million | $505.71 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $61.90 Million | $443.72 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | $51.01 Million | $426.31 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $41.59 Million | $560.74 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $38.10 Million | $488.00 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 1998 | 0.32x | $38.10 Million | $119.80 Million | ▲ +64.9% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $19.40 Million | $100.60 Million | ▲ +33.5% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | $14.70 Million | $101.80 Million | — |