Casella Waste Systems Inc (CWST) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Casella Waste Systems Inc (CWST) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $62.25 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.70 Billion) in one year. See Casella Waste Systems Inc (CWST) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Casella Waste Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Casella Waste Systems Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore Casella Waste Systems Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Casella Waste Systems Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Casella Waste Systems Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Casella Waste Systems Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $329.78 Million | $1.84 Billion | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $281.36 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $233.09 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $217.31 Million | $951.32 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $182.74 Million | $861.12 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $139.92 Million | $831.76 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $116.83 Million | $809.43 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | $120.83 Million | $748.24 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $107.54 Million | $652.81 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $80.43 Million | $656.06 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $70.51 Million | $655.27 Million | ▲ +91.7% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $38.29 Million | $682.05 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $38.29 Million | $681.82 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $43.86 Million | $644.18 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $43.86 Million | $644.18 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $63.77 Million | $615.51 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $47.09 Million | $596.59 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $69.27 Million | $704.52 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $72.22 Million | $711.40 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $71.81 Million | $711.40 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $81.45 Million | $703.07 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $75.50 Million | $591.19 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $83.03 Million | $505.71 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $61.90 Million | $443.72 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | $51.01 Million | $426.31 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $41.59 Million | $560.74 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $38.10 Million | $488.00 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 1998 | 0.32x | $38.10 Million | $119.80 Million | ▲ +64.9% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $19.40 Million | $100.60 Million | ▲ +33.5% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | $14.70 Million | $101.80 Million | — |