Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc (DHIL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc (DHIL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $16.69 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($83.97 Million) in one year. See DHIL free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see DHIL operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc. Check DHIL cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.55x | $46.37 Million | $83.97 Million | ▲ +174.7% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $16.60 Million | $82.56 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2023 | 0.48x | $34.67 Million | $71.78 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2022 | 0.55x | $39.48 Million | $72.02 Million | ▲ +75.0% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | $26.31 Million | $83.97 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2020 | 0.86x | $59.77 Million | $69.64 Million | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2019 | 0.87x | $56.97 Million | $65.63 Million | ▲ +108.2% |
| 2018 | 0.42x | $28.13 Million | $67.47 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2017 | 1.05x | $60.92 Million | $57.87 Million | ▲ +144.7% |
| 2016 | 0.43x | $20.07 Million | $46.65 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2015 | 1.30x | $52.03 Million | $39.87 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2014 | 1.28x | $42.62 Million | $33.39 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2013 | 1.14x | $34.58 Million | $30.41 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2012 | 1.26x | $24.55 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2011 | 1.15x | $22.71 Million | $19.67 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2010 | 1.23x | $25.97 Million | $21.07 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2009 | 0.97x | $17.00 Million | $17.52 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2008 | 1.22x | $17.41 Million | $14.29 Million | ▲ +69.0% |
| 2007 | 0.72x | $10.07 Million | $13.98 Million | ▼ -33.4% |
| 2006 | 1.08x | $18.14 Million | $16.75 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2005 | 1.52x | $2.86 Million | $1.89 Million | ▲ +142.5% |
| 2004 | -3.57x | $-1.43 Million | $401.22K | ▲ +57.1% |
| 2003 | -8.31x | $-1.15 Million | $138.83K | ▼ -2809.2% |
| 2002 | -0.29x | $-73.22K | $256.20K | ▲ +79.4% |
| 2001 | -1.38x | $-680.89K | $491.77K | ▼ -122.9% |
| 2000 | 6.04x | $2.59 Million | $429.04K | ▲ +126.2% |
| 1999 | 2.67x | $2.59 Million | $970.26K | ▲ +2635.6% |
| 1998 | -0.11x | $-200.00K | $1.90 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.11x | $-200.00K | $1.90 Million | ▼ -152.8% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $574.03K | $2.88 Million | ▲ +123.7% |
| 1995 | -0.84x | $-1.11 Million | $1.32 Million | — |