Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc (DHIL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $16.69 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($83.97 Million) in one year. Check Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc (DHIL) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc across 31 annual periods. Check DHIL capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see DHIL cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.55x | $46.37 Million | $83.97 Million | ▲ +174.7% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $16.60 Million | $82.56 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2023 | 0.48x | $34.67 Million | $71.78 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2022 | 0.55x | $39.48 Million | $72.02 Million | ▲ +75.0% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | $26.31 Million | $83.97 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2020 | 0.86x | $59.77 Million | $69.64 Million | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2019 | 0.87x | $56.97 Million | $65.63 Million | ▲ +108.2% |
| 2018 | 0.42x | $28.13 Million | $67.47 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2017 | 1.05x | $60.92 Million | $57.87 Million | ▲ +144.7% |
| 2016 | 0.43x | $20.07 Million | $46.65 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2015 | 1.30x | $52.03 Million | $39.87 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2014 | 1.28x | $42.62 Million | $33.39 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2013 | 1.14x | $34.58 Million | $30.41 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2012 | 1.26x | $24.55 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2011 | 1.15x | $22.71 Million | $19.67 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2010 | 1.23x | $25.97 Million | $21.07 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2009 | 0.97x | $17.00 Million | $17.52 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2008 | 1.22x | $17.41 Million | $14.29 Million | ▲ +69.0% |
| 2007 | 0.72x | $10.07 Million | $13.98 Million | ▼ -33.4% |
| 2006 | 1.08x | $18.14 Million | $16.75 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2005 | 1.52x | $2.86 Million | $1.89 Million | ▲ +142.5% |
| 2004 | -3.57x | $-1.43 Million | $401.22K | ▲ +57.1% |
| 2003 | -8.31x | $-1.15 Million | $138.83K | ▼ -2809.2% |
| 2002 | -0.29x | $-73.22K | $256.20K | ▲ +79.4% |
| 2001 | -1.38x | $-680.89K | $491.77K | ▼ -122.9% |
| 2000 | 6.04x | $2.59 Million | $429.04K | ▲ +126.2% |
| 1999 | 2.67x | $2.59 Million | $970.26K | ▲ +2635.6% |
| 1998 | -0.11x | $-200.00K | $1.90 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.11x | $-200.00K | $1.90 Million | ▼ -152.8% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $574.03K | $2.88 Million | ▲ +123.7% |
| 1995 | -0.84x | $-1.11 Million | $1.32 Million | — |