Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc (DHIL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc (DHIL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $16.69 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($83.97 Million) in one year. See DHIL FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Diamond Hill Investment Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see DHIL market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.55x | $46.37 Million | $83.97 Million | ▲ +174.7% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $16.60 Million | $82.56 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2023 | 0.48x | $34.67 Million | $71.78 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2022 | 0.55x | $39.48 Million | $72.02 Million | ▲ +75.0% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | $26.31 Million | $83.97 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2020 | 0.86x | $59.77 Million | $69.64 Million | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2019 | 0.87x | $56.97 Million | $65.63 Million | ▲ +108.2% |
| 2018 | 0.42x | $28.13 Million | $67.47 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2017 | 1.05x | $60.92 Million | $57.87 Million | ▲ +144.7% |
| 2016 | 0.43x | $20.07 Million | $46.65 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2015 | 1.30x | $52.03 Million | $39.87 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2014 | 1.28x | $42.62 Million | $33.39 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2013 | 1.14x | $34.58 Million | $30.41 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2012 | 1.26x | $24.55 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2011 | 1.15x | $22.71 Million | $19.67 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2010 | 1.23x | $25.97 Million | $21.07 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2009 | 0.97x | $17.00 Million | $17.52 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2008 | 1.22x | $17.41 Million | $14.29 Million | ▲ +69.0% |
| 2007 | 0.72x | $10.07 Million | $13.98 Million | ▼ -33.4% |
| 2006 | 1.08x | $18.14 Million | $16.75 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2005 | 1.52x | $2.86 Million | $1.89 Million | ▲ +142.5% |
| 2004 | -3.57x | $-1.43 Million | $401.22K | ▲ +57.1% |
| 2003 | -8.31x | $-1.15 Million | $138.83K | ▼ -2809.2% |
| 2002 | -0.29x | $-73.22K | $256.20K | ▲ +79.4% |
| 2001 | -1.38x | $-680.89K | $491.77K | ▼ -122.9% |
| 2000 | 6.04x | $2.59 Million | $429.04K | ▲ +126.2% |
| 1999 | 2.67x | $2.59 Million | $970.26K | ▲ +2635.6% |
| 1998 | -0.11x | $-200.00K | $1.90 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.11x | $-200.00K | $1.90 Million | ▼ -152.8% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $574.03K | $2.88 Million | ▲ +123.7% |
| 1995 | -0.84x | $-1.11 Million | $1.32 Million | — |