DLH Holdings Corp (DLHC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
DLH Holdings Corp (DLHC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.79 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($166.44 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of DLH Holdings Corp to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
DLH Holdings Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1987–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for DLH Holdings Corp across 39 annual periods. Also explore DLH Holdings Corp equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for DLH Holdings Corp (1987–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for DLH Holdings Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see DLH Holdings Corp market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $23.22 Million | $177.71 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $27.37 Million | $204.25 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $31.03 Million | $237.40 Million | ▲ +709.3% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $1.24 Million | $76.95 Million | ▼ -95.3% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $45.66 Million | $131.56 Million | ▲ +132.2% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $19.45 Million | $130.12 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $18.04 Million | $83.69 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2018 | 0.61x | $14.08 Million | $23.12 Million | ▲ +216.0% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | $6.52 Million | $33.87 Million | ▲ +6.2% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $6.04 Million | $33.30 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $1.98 Million | $5.75 Million | ▲ +235.8% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $1.67 Million | $16.23 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $1.80 Million | $17.97 Million | ▲ +167.4% |
| 2012 | -0.15x | $-2.78 Million | $18.67 Million | ▼ -147.0% |
| 2011 | -0.06x | $-987.00K | $16.36 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2010 | -0.13x | $-2.24 Million | $16.85 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | $-2.09 Million | $15.84 Million | ▼ -148.2% |
| 2008 | 0.27x | $4.68 Million | $17.11 Million | ▲ +290.6% |
| 2007 | -0.14x | $-1.38 Million | $9.57 Million | ▼ -115.9% |
| 2006 | 0.90x | $8.66 Million | $9.57 Million | ▲ +793.6% |
| 2005 | -0.13x | $-2.05 Million | $15.74 Million | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2004 | -0.19x | $-1.19 Million | $6.44 Million | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2003 | -0.27x | $-6.81 Million | $25.51 Million | ▼ -763.1% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $1.18 Million | $29.23 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $3.94 Million | $29.81 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $3.84 Million | $31.45 Million | ▼ -26.0% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $3.20 Million | $19.40 Million | ▲ +617.5% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $200.00K | $8.70 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $1.00 Million | $9.30 Million | ▲ +134.1% |
| 1996 | -0.32x | $-2.40 Million | $7.60 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 1995 | -0.29x | $-3.10 Million | $10.60 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 1994 | -0.27x | $-700.00K | $2.60 Million | ▲ +63.0% |
| 1993 | -0.73x | $-800.00K | $1.10 Million | ▼ -1572.7% |
| 1992 | -0.04x | $-100.00K | $2.30 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 1991 | -0.04x | $-100.00K | $2.70 Million | ▲ +74.1% |
| 1990 | -0.14x | $-300.00K | $2.10 Million | ▼ -71.4% |
| 1989 | -0.08x | $-100.00K | $1.20 Million | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1988 | -0.25x | $-200.00K | $800.00K | ▼ -188.2% |
| 1987 | 0.28x | $170.00K | $600.00K | — |