Dynatronics Corporation (DYNT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dynatronics Corporation (DYNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-93.32K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.94 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Dynatronics Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Dynatronics Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Dynatronics Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore DYNT year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Dynatronics Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dynatronics Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Dynatronics Corporation (DYNT) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $300.58K | $12.18 Million | ▲ +118.1% |
| 2024 | -0.14x | $-1.61 Million | $11.78 Million | ▼ -585.3% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $372.00K | $13.21 Million | ▲ +107.9% |
| 2022 | -0.36x | $-4.88 Million | $13.73 Million | ▼ -1365.1% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $383.00K | $13.63 Million | ▼ -93.0% |
| 2020 | 0.40x | $3.09 Million | $7.68 Million | ▲ +2232.1% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $325.68K | $18.88 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $761.80K | $20.68 Million | ▲ +133.1% |
| 2017 | -0.11x | $-1.53 Million | $13.74 Million | ▼ -101.4% |
| 2016 | -0.06x | $-534.98K | $9.68 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | $-1.07 Million | $11.85 Million | ▼ -247.1% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $506.52K | $8.29 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $643.11K | $8.90 Million | ▲ +1717.8% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $35.81K | $9.00 Million | ▼ -98.0% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $1.61 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | $2.89 Million | $8.29 Million | ▲ +151.8% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $1.47 Million | $10.67 Million | ▲ +153.5% |
| 2008 | -0.26x | $-3.14 Million | $12.16 Million | ▼ -901.2% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $241.58K | $7.50 Million | ▲ +164.7% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | $-241.58K | $4.85 Million | ▼ -111.7% |
| 2005 | 0.43x | $1.68 Million | $3.95 Million | ▲ +415.3% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $462.22K | $5.60 Million | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $516.67K | $5.11 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $1.84 Million | $4.93 Million | ▲ +596.6% |
| 2001 | -0.08x | $-476.62K | $6.33 Million | ▼ -169.0% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $634.02K | $5.81 Million | ▲ +177.5% |
| 1999 | -0.14x | $-1.00 Million | $7.10 Million | ▼ -107.7% |
| 1998 | -0.07x | $-400.00K | $5.90 Million | ▼ -144.6% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $700.00K | $4.60 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $800.00K | $4.10 Million | ▲ +88.6% |
| 1995 | 0.10x | $300.00K | $2.90 Million | ▲ +270.7% |
| 1994 | -0.06x | $-200.00K | $3.30 Million | ▼ -227.3% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $100.00K | $2.10 Million | ▼ -90.5% |
| 1992 | 0.50x | $400.00K | $800.00K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.50x | $300.00K | $600.00K | ▲ +175.0% |
| 1990 | -0.67x | $-400.00K | $600.00K | — |