Dynatronics Corporation (DYNT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dynatronics Corporation (DYNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-93.32K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.94 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Dynatronics Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Dynatronics Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Dynatronics Corporation across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Dynatronics Corporation generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Dynatronics Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dynatronics Corporation. Check earnings quality score of Dynatronics Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $300.58K | $12.18 Million | ▲ +118.1% |
| 2024 | -0.14x | $-1.61 Million | $11.78 Million | ▼ -585.3% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $372.00K | $13.21 Million | ▲ +107.9% |
| 2022 | -0.36x | $-4.88 Million | $13.73 Million | ▼ -1365.1% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $383.00K | $13.63 Million | ▼ -93.0% |
| 2020 | 0.40x | $3.09 Million | $7.68 Million | ▲ +2232.1% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $325.68K | $18.88 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $761.80K | $20.68 Million | ▲ +133.1% |
| 2017 | -0.11x | $-1.53 Million | $13.74 Million | ▼ -101.4% |
| 2016 | -0.06x | $-534.98K | $9.68 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | $-1.07 Million | $11.85 Million | ▼ -247.1% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $506.52K | $8.29 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $643.11K | $8.90 Million | ▲ +1717.8% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $35.81K | $9.00 Million | ▼ -98.0% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $1.61 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | $2.89 Million | $8.29 Million | ▲ +151.8% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $1.47 Million | $10.67 Million | ▲ +153.5% |
| 2008 | -0.26x | $-3.14 Million | $12.16 Million | ▼ -901.2% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $241.58K | $7.50 Million | ▲ +164.7% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | $-241.58K | $4.85 Million | ▼ -111.7% |
| 2005 | 0.43x | $1.68 Million | $3.95 Million | ▲ +415.3% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $462.22K | $5.60 Million | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $516.67K | $5.11 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $1.84 Million | $4.93 Million | ▲ +596.6% |
| 2001 | -0.08x | $-476.62K | $6.33 Million | ▼ -169.0% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $634.02K | $5.81 Million | ▲ +177.5% |
| 1999 | -0.14x | $-1.00 Million | $7.10 Million | ▼ -107.7% |
| 1998 | -0.07x | $-400.00K | $5.90 Million | ▼ -144.6% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $700.00K | $4.60 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $800.00K | $4.10 Million | ▲ +88.6% |
| 1995 | 0.10x | $300.00K | $2.90 Million | ▲ +270.7% |
| 1994 | -0.06x | $-200.00K | $3.30 Million | ▼ -227.3% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $100.00K | $2.10 Million | ▼ -90.5% |
| 1992 | 0.50x | $400.00K | $800.00K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.50x | $300.00K | $600.00K | ▲ +175.0% |
| 1990 | -0.67x | $-400.00K | $600.00K | — |