Dynatronics Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dynatronics Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Dynatronics Corporation (DYNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-93.32K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.94 Million) in one year. Check Dynatronics Corporation (DYNT) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Dynatronics Corporation (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Dynatronics Corporation from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Dynatronics Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Dynatronics Corporation reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Dynatronics Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Dynatronics Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dynatronics Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Dynatronics Corporation (DYNT) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $300.58K | $12.18 Million | ▲ +118.1% |
| 2024 | -0.14x | $-1.61 Million | $11.78 Million | ▼ -585.3% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $372.00K | $13.21 Million | ▲ +107.9% |
| 2022 | -0.36x | $-4.88 Million | $13.73 Million | ▼ -1365.1% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $383.00K | $13.63 Million | ▼ -93.0% |
| 2020 | 0.40x | $3.09 Million | $7.68 Million | ▲ +2232.1% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $325.68K | $18.88 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $761.80K | $20.68 Million | ▲ +133.1% |
| 2017 | -0.11x | $-1.53 Million | $13.74 Million | ▼ -101.4% |
| 2016 | -0.06x | $-534.98K | $9.68 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | $-1.07 Million | $11.85 Million | ▼ -247.1% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $506.52K | $8.29 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $643.11K | $8.90 Million | ▲ +1717.8% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $35.81K | $9.00 Million | ▼ -98.0% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $1.61 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | $2.89 Million | $8.29 Million | ▲ +151.8% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $1.47 Million | $10.67 Million | ▲ +153.5% |
| 2008 | -0.26x | $-3.14 Million | $12.16 Million | ▼ -901.2% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $241.58K | $7.50 Million | ▲ +164.7% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | $-241.58K | $4.85 Million | ▼ -111.7% |
| 2005 | 0.43x | $1.68 Million | $3.95 Million | ▲ +415.3% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $462.22K | $5.60 Million | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $516.67K | $5.11 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $1.84 Million | $4.93 Million | ▲ +596.6% |
| 2001 | -0.08x | $-476.62K | $6.33 Million | ▼ -169.0% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $634.02K | $5.81 Million | ▲ +177.5% |
| 1999 | -0.14x | $-1.00 Million | $7.10 Million | ▼ -107.7% |
| 1998 | -0.07x | $-400.00K | $5.90 Million | ▼ -144.6% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $700.00K | $4.60 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $800.00K | $4.10 Million | ▲ +88.6% |
| 1995 | 0.10x | $300.00K | $2.90 Million | ▲ +270.7% |
| 1994 | -0.06x | $-200.00K | $3.30 Million | ▼ -227.3% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $100.00K | $2.10 Million | ▼ -90.5% |
| 1992 | 0.50x | $400.00K | $800.00K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.50x | $300.00K | $600.00K | ▲ +175.0% |
| 1990 | -0.67x | $-400.00K | $600.00K | — |