Dynatronics Corporation (DYNT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dynatronics Corporation (DYNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-93.32K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.94 Million) in one year. Check DYNT total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Dynatronics Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Dynatronics Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore DYNT total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Dynatronics Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dynatronics Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Dynatronics Corporation (DYNT) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $300.58K | $12.18 Million | ▲ +118.1% |
| 2024 | -0.14x | $-1.61 Million | $11.78 Million | ▼ -585.3% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $372.00K | $13.21 Million | ▲ +107.9% |
| 2022 | -0.36x | $-4.88 Million | $13.73 Million | ▼ -1365.1% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $383.00K | $13.63 Million | ▼ -93.0% |
| 2020 | 0.40x | $3.09 Million | $7.68 Million | ▲ +2232.1% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $325.68K | $18.88 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $761.80K | $20.68 Million | ▲ +133.1% |
| 2017 | -0.11x | $-1.53 Million | $13.74 Million | ▼ -101.4% |
| 2016 | -0.06x | $-534.98K | $9.68 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | $-1.07 Million | $11.85 Million | ▼ -247.1% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $506.52K | $8.29 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $643.11K | $8.90 Million | ▲ +1717.8% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $35.81K | $9.00 Million | ▼ -98.0% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $1.61 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | $2.89 Million | $8.29 Million | ▲ +151.8% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $1.47 Million | $10.67 Million | ▲ +153.5% |
| 2008 | -0.26x | $-3.14 Million | $12.16 Million | ▼ -901.2% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $241.58K | $7.50 Million | ▲ +164.7% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | $-241.58K | $4.85 Million | ▼ -111.7% |
| 2005 | 0.43x | $1.68 Million | $3.95 Million | ▲ +415.3% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $462.22K | $5.60 Million | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $516.67K | $5.11 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $1.84 Million | $4.93 Million | ▲ +596.6% |
| 2001 | -0.08x | $-476.62K | $6.33 Million | ▼ -169.0% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $634.02K | $5.81 Million | ▲ +177.5% |
| 1999 | -0.14x | $-1.00 Million | $7.10 Million | ▼ -107.7% |
| 1998 | -0.07x | $-400.00K | $5.90 Million | ▼ -144.6% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $700.00K | $4.60 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $800.00K | $4.10 Million | ▲ +88.6% |
| 1995 | 0.10x | $300.00K | $2.90 Million | ▲ +270.7% |
| 1994 | -0.06x | $-200.00K | $3.30 Million | ▼ -227.3% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $100.00K | $2.10 Million | ▼ -90.5% |
| 1992 | 0.50x | $400.00K | $800.00K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.50x | $300.00K | $600.00K | ▲ +175.0% |
| 1990 | -0.67x | $-400.00K | $600.00K | — |