Energy Focu (EFOI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Energy Focu (EFOI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.86x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-862.00K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($1.00 Million) in one year. See Energy Focu free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Energy Focu Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Energy Focu across 33 annual periods. Also explore EFOI net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Energy Focu (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Energy Focu. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Energy Focu worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.40x | $-1.40 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -191.9% |
| 2024 | -0.48x | $-1.30 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2023 | -0.34x | $-2.44 Million | $7.15 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2022 | -0.75x | $-6.71 Million | $8.97 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2021 | -1.19x | $-9.77 Million | $8.18 Million | ▼ -296.4% |
| 2020 | -0.30x | $-2.45 Million | $8.14 Million | ▲ +64.8% |
| 2019 | -0.86x | $-6.62 Million | $7.74 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2018 | -0.91x | $-6.79 Million | $7.44 Million | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2017 | -2.05x | $-5.87 Million | $2.86 Million | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2016 | -3.28x | $-16.55 Million | $5.04 Million | ▼ -866.9% |
| 2015 | 0.43x | $4.45 Million | $10.38 Million | ▲ +392.2% |
| 2014 | -0.15x | $-1.43 Million | $9.72 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2013 | -0.73x | $-7.21 Million | $9.88 Million | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2012 | -0.51x | $-6.97 Million | $13.53 Million | ▼ -142.2% |
| 2011 | -0.21x | $-2.62 Million | $12.31 Million | ▼ -295.3% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $1.49 Million | $13.72 Million | ▲ +106.1% |
| 2009 | -1.80x | $-10.56 Million | $5.87 Million | ▼ -111.7% |
| 2008 | -0.85x | $-5.83 Million | $6.86 Million | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2007 | -1.03x | $-7.50 Million | $7.25 Million | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2006 | -0.74x | $-7.18 Million | $9.71 Million | ▼ -71.0% |
| 2005 | -0.43x | $-3.47 Million | $8.03 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2004 | -0.42x | $-2.47 Million | $5.82 Million | ▼ -336.2% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | $929.00K | $5.17 Million | ▲ +156.3% |
| 2002 | -0.32x | $-1.87 Million | $5.86 Million | ▼ -623.1% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-221.00K | $5.00 Million | ▲ +58.5% |
| 2000 | -0.11x | $-645.00K | $6.06 Million | ▼ -150.6% |
| 1999 | 0.21x | $1.20 Million | $5.70 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 1998 | 0.15x | $800.00K | $5.50 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $800.00K | $2.40 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 1996 | 0.41x | $900.00K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +186.4% |
| 1995 | 0.14x | $300.00K | $2.10 Million | ▲ +171.4% |
| 1994 | 0.05x | $100.00K | $1.90 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 1993 | 0.08x | $100.00K | $1.30 Million | — |