Escalade Incorporated (ESCA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Escalade Incorporated (ESCA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($51.71 Million) in one year. See Escalade Incorporated (ESCA) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Escalade Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Escalade Incorporated across 35 annual periods. Also explore ESCA shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Escalade Incorporated (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Escalade Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Escalade Incorporated (ESCA) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.63x | $31.01 Million | $48.89 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2024 | 0.63x | $36.05 Million | $57.33 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2023 | 0.55x | $48.33 Million | $88.43 Million | ▲ +799.2% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $8.52 Million | $140.24 Million | ▲ +580.8% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $939.00K | $105.18 Million | ▼ -72.4% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $2.63 Million | $81.55 Million | ▼ -95.4% |
| 2019 | 0.71x | $16.04 Million | $22.61 Million | ▲ +131.2% |
| 2018 | 0.31x | $6.51 Million | $21.21 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2017 | 0.30x | $13.36 Million | $44.44 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | $12.17 Million | $49.05 Million | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2015 | 0.33x | $15.46 Million | $47.26 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2014 | 0.48x | $18.38 Million | $38.10 Million | ▲ +210.5% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $8.39 Million | $54.02 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $6.56 Million | $45.28 Million | ▲ +138.8% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $2.58 Million | $42.55 Million | ▼ -72.2% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $8.85 Million | $40.52 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2009 | 0.41x | $18.31 Million | $44.47 Million | ▲ +1584.1% |
| 2008 | -0.03x | $-1.91 Million | $68.91 Million | ▼ -111.7% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | $14.31 Million | $60.27 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $19.90 Million | $65.00 Million | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2005 | 0.49x | $24.63 Million | $50.70 Million | ▲ +105.9% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | $15.36 Million | $65.12 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2003 | 0.36x | $26.53 Million | $73.15 Million | ▲ +376.5% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $3.87 Million | $50.91 Million | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | $19.62 Million | $41.72 Million | ▲ +85.6% |
| 2000 | 0.25x | $11.53 Million | $45.52 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 1999 | 0.40x | $14.90 Million | $37.40 Million | ▲ +70.5% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $8.60 Million | $36.80 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $8.80 Million | $42.60 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 1996 | 0.44x | $15.30 Million | $35.10 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 1995 | 0.54x | $18.70 Million | $34.50 Million | ▲ +604.0% |
| 1994 | -0.11x | $-5.70 Million | $53.00 Million | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | $4.40 Million | $40.90 Million | ▲ +123.8% |
| 1992 | 0.05x | $2.00 Million | $41.60 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 1991 | 0.07x | $2.60 Million | $37.70 Million | — |