Escalade Incorporated (ESCA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Escalade Incorporated (ESCA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.67 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($51.89 Million) in one year. See ESCA financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Escalade Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Escalade Incorporated across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Escalade Incorporated (ESCA) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Escalade Incorporated (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Escalade Incorporated. Check Escalade Incorporated cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.63x | $31.01 Million | $48.89 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2024 | 0.63x | $36.05 Million | $57.33 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2023 | 0.55x | $48.33 Million | $88.43 Million | ▲ +799.2% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $8.52 Million | $140.24 Million | ▲ +580.8% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $939.00K | $105.18 Million | ▼ -72.4% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $2.63 Million | $81.55 Million | ▼ -95.4% |
| 2019 | 0.71x | $16.04 Million | $22.61 Million | ▲ +131.2% |
| 2018 | 0.31x | $6.51 Million | $21.21 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2017 | 0.30x | $13.36 Million | $44.44 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | $12.17 Million | $49.05 Million | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2015 | 0.33x | $15.46 Million | $47.26 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2014 | 0.48x | $18.38 Million | $38.10 Million | ▲ +210.5% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $8.39 Million | $54.02 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $6.56 Million | $45.28 Million | ▲ +138.8% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $2.58 Million | $42.55 Million | ▼ -72.2% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $8.85 Million | $40.52 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2009 | 0.41x | $18.31 Million | $44.47 Million | ▲ +1584.1% |
| 2008 | -0.03x | $-1.91 Million | $68.91 Million | ▼ -111.7% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | $14.31 Million | $60.27 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $19.90 Million | $65.00 Million | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2005 | 0.49x | $24.63 Million | $50.70 Million | ▲ +105.9% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | $15.36 Million | $65.12 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2003 | 0.36x | $26.53 Million | $73.15 Million | ▲ +376.5% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $3.87 Million | $50.91 Million | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | $19.62 Million | $41.72 Million | ▲ +85.6% |
| 2000 | 0.25x | $11.53 Million | $45.52 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 1999 | 0.40x | $14.90 Million | $37.40 Million | ▲ +70.5% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $8.60 Million | $36.80 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $8.80 Million | $42.60 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 1996 | 0.44x | $15.30 Million | $35.10 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 1995 | 0.54x | $18.70 Million | $34.50 Million | ▲ +604.0% |
| 1994 | -0.11x | $-5.70 Million | $53.00 Million | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | $4.40 Million | $40.90 Million | ▲ +123.8% |
| 1992 | 0.05x | $2.00 Million | $41.60 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 1991 | 0.07x | $2.60 Million | $37.70 Million | — |