Exelixis Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Exelixis Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Exelixis Inc (EXEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.49x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $333.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($683.10 Million) in one year. Check EXEL cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Exelixis Inc (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Exelixis Inc from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Exelixis Inc across 27 annual periods. Check cash flow quality index of Exelixis Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Exelixis Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Exelixis Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Exelixis Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see EXEL cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.29x | $884.27 Million | $683.10 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2024 | 1.00x | $699.97 Million | $703.49 Million | ▲ +102.5% |
| 2023 | 0.49x | $333.32 Million | $678.45 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2022 | 0.62x | $362.61 Million | $583.06 Million | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2021 | 0.99x | $400.80 Million | $405.62 Million | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2020 | 0.81x | $208.98 Million | $258.22 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2019 | 2.64x | $526.96 Million | $199.70 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2018 | 3.08x | $415.72 Million | $134.83 Million | ▲ +589.5% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | $165.61 Million | $370.33 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | $206.30 Million | $508.22 Million | ▲ +225.2% |
| 2015 | -0.32x | $-141.59 Million | $436.65 Million | ▲ +39.0% |
| 2014 | -0.53x | $-235.41 Million | $442.79 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2013 | -0.45x | $-198.77 Million | $437.05 Million | ▼ -56.8% |
| 2012 | -0.29x | $-123.15 Million | $424.66 Million | ▲ +44.9% |
| 2011 | -0.53x | $-159.23 Million | $302.63 Million | ▼ -206.8% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | $-101.05 Million | $589.12 Million | ▼ -496.2% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | $-14.59 Million | $507.13 Million | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-9.76 Million | $457.88 Million | ▲ +89.9% |
| 2007 | -0.21x | $-68.74 Million | $326.61 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2006 | -0.15x | $-45.34 Million | $304.81 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2005 | -0.17x | $-46.36 Million | $275.42 Million | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2004 | -0.39x | $-93.84 Million | $240.67 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2003 | -0.40x | $-79.24 Million | $196.31 Million | ▼ -113.0% |
| 2002 | -0.19x | $-30.92 Million | $163.19 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2001 | -0.22x | $-23.77 Million | $109.39 Million | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2000 | -0.31x | $-12.87 Million | $41.14 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 1999 | -0.34x | $-7.30 Million | $21.70 Million | — |