FuelCell Energy Inc (FCEL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
FuelCell Energy Inc (FCEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-27.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($274.87 Million) in one year. Explore FuelCell Energy Inc (FCEL) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
FuelCell Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for FuelCell Energy Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore FuelCell Energy Inc (FCEL) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for FuelCell Energy Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for FuelCell Energy Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see FCEL stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.62x | $-125.29 Million | $201.00 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2024 | -0.71x | $-152.91 Million | $216.66 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2023 | -0.72x | $-140.25 Million | $195.22 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2022 | -0.61x | $-112.17 Million | $185.33 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2021 | -0.41x | $-70.44 Million | $169.92 Million | ▼ -203.3% |
| 2020 | -0.14x | $-36.78 Million | $269.13 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2019 | -0.15x | $-30.57 Million | $197.85 Million | ▼ -254.8% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $16.32 Million | $163.50 Million | ▲ +127.1% |
| 2017 | -0.37x | $-71.84 Million | $194.97 Million | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2016 | -0.28x | $-46.59 Million | $167.88 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2015 | -0.36x | $-44.27 Million | $122.62 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2014 | -0.47x | $-57.47 Million | $122.33 Million | ▼ -438.6% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | $-16.66 Million | $190.97 Million | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2012 | -0.50x | $-58.66 Million | $117.50 Million | ▼ -1065.0% |
| 2011 | -0.04x | $-8.48 Million | $198.00 Million | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2010 | -0.24x | $-34.99 Million | $142.84 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2009 | -0.56x | $-65.20 Million | $116.37 Million | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2008 | -0.49x | $-61.41 Million | $125.11 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2007 | -0.52x | $-55.97 Million | $107.28 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2006 | -0.51x | $-48.41 Million | $95.19 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2005 | -0.45x | $-55.97 Million | $123.04 Million | ▲ +83.3% |
| 2004 | -2.72x | $-64.05 Million | $23.55 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 2003 | -3.22x | $-58.84 Million | $18.28 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2002 | -3.04x | $-55.09 Million | $18.10 Million | ▼ -165.2% |
| 2001 | -1.15x | $-16.41 Million | $14.30 Million | ▼ -2821.2% |
| 2000 | 0.04x | $320.00K | $7.59 Million | ▲ +102.4% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $100.00K | $4.80 Million | ▼ -93.6% |
| 1998 | 0.32x | $2.50 Million | $7.70 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $2.20 Million | $6.60 Million | ▲ +123.8% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $1.40 Million | $9.40 Million | ▼ -75.0% |
| 1995 | 0.59x | $6.90 Million | $11.60 Million | ▲ +613.8% |
| 1994 | 0.08x | $900.00K | $10.80 Million | ▼ -75.8% |
| 1993 | 0.34x | $3.20 Million | $9.30 Million | ▲ +1889.2% |
| 1992 | -0.02x | $-200.00K | $10.40 Million | — |