FuelCell Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
FuelCell Energy Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. FuelCell Energy Inc (FCEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-27.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($274.87 Million) in one year. Check how aggressively does FuelCell Energy Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of FuelCell Energy Inc (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of FuelCell Energy Inc from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for FuelCell Energy Inc across 34 annual periods. Check FuelCell Energy Inc (FCEL) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
FuelCell Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
FuelCell Energy Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for FuelCell Energy Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FuelCell Energy Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.62x | $-125.29 Million | $201.00 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2024 | -0.71x | $-152.91 Million | $216.66 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2023 | -0.72x | $-140.25 Million | $195.22 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2022 | -0.61x | $-112.17 Million | $185.33 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2021 | -0.41x | $-70.44 Million | $169.92 Million | ▼ -203.3% |
| 2020 | -0.14x | $-36.78 Million | $269.13 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2019 | -0.15x | $-30.57 Million | $197.85 Million | ▼ -254.8% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $16.32 Million | $163.50 Million | ▲ +127.1% |
| 2017 | -0.37x | $-71.84 Million | $194.97 Million | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2016 | -0.28x | $-46.59 Million | $167.88 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2015 | -0.36x | $-44.27 Million | $122.62 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2014 | -0.47x | $-57.47 Million | $122.33 Million | ▼ -438.6% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | $-16.66 Million | $190.97 Million | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2012 | -0.50x | $-58.66 Million | $117.50 Million | ▼ -1065.0% |
| 2011 | -0.04x | $-8.48 Million | $198.00 Million | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2010 | -0.24x | $-34.99 Million | $142.84 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2009 | -0.56x | $-65.20 Million | $116.37 Million | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2008 | -0.49x | $-61.41 Million | $125.11 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2007 | -0.52x | $-55.97 Million | $107.28 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2006 | -0.51x | $-48.41 Million | $95.19 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2005 | -0.45x | $-55.97 Million | $123.04 Million | ▲ +83.3% |
| 2004 | -2.72x | $-64.05 Million | $23.55 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 2003 | -3.22x | $-58.84 Million | $18.28 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2002 | -3.04x | $-55.09 Million | $18.10 Million | ▼ -165.2% |
| 2001 | -1.15x | $-16.41 Million | $14.30 Million | ▼ -2821.2% |
| 2000 | 0.04x | $320.00K | $7.59 Million | ▲ +102.4% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $100.00K | $4.80 Million | ▼ -93.6% |
| 1998 | 0.32x | $2.50 Million | $7.70 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $2.20 Million | $6.60 Million | ▲ +123.8% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $1.40 Million | $9.40 Million | ▼ -75.0% |
| 1995 | 0.59x | $6.90 Million | $11.60 Million | ▲ +613.8% |
| 1994 | 0.08x | $900.00K | $10.80 Million | ▼ -75.8% |
| 1993 | 0.34x | $3.20 Million | $9.30 Million | ▲ +1889.2% |
| 1992 | -0.02x | $-200.00K | $10.40 Million | — |