Franklin Wireless Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Franklin Wireless Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Franklin Wireless Corp (FKWL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $11.26K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($13.99 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Franklin Wireless Corp to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Franklin Wireless Corp (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Franklin Wireless Corp from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Franklin Wireless Corp across 26 annual periods. Check Franklin Wireless Corp cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Franklin Wireless Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Franklin Wireless Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Franklin Wireless Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FKWL cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.14x | $1.84 Million | $13.44 Million | ▲ +283.6% |
| 2024 | -0.07x | $-773.36K | $10.34 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2023 | -0.11x | $-1.88 Million | $16.63 Million | ▲ +85.5% |
| 2022 | -0.78x | $-7.41 Million | $9.49 Million | ▼ -174.9% |
| 2021 | 1.04x | $12.10 Million | $11.62 Million | ▲ +109.4% |
| 2020 | 0.50x | $22.00 Million | $44.26 Million | ▲ +279.8% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $775.09K | $5.92 Million | ▲ +152.8% |
| 2018 | -0.25x | $-2.01 Million | $8.10 Million | ▼ -319.9% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $1.49 Million | $13.20 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $2.71 Million | $13.53 Million | ▼ -59.6% |
| 2015 | 0.50x | $4.19 Million | $8.44 Million | ▲ +294.3% |
| 2014 | -0.26x | $-1.71 Million | $6.69 Million | ▼ -134.6% |
| 2013 | 0.74x | $4.90 Million | $6.65 Million | ▲ +3642.5% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-269.96K | $12.98 Million | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2011 | -0.54x | $-2.82 Million | $5.20 Million | ▼ -150.0% |
| 2010 | 1.09x | $11.11 Million | $10.23 Million | ▲ +1032.4% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $443.39K | $4.62 Million | ▼ -85.9% |
| 2008 | 0.68x | $3.84 Million | $5.65 Million | ▼ -59.7% |
| 2007 | 1.69x | $1.75 Million | $1.04 Million | ▲ +573.1% |
| 2006 | -0.36x | $-260.74K | $731.55K | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2005 | -0.54x | $-413.52K | $761.95K | ▲ +45.4% |
| 2002 | -0.99x | $-3.75 Million | $3.77 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2001 | -0.99x | $-3.75 Million | $3.77 Million | ▲ +75.9% |
| 2000 | -4.13x | $-9.30 Million | $2.25 Million | ▼ -292.0% |
| 1999 | -1.05x | $-3.90 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +57.8% |
| 1998 | -2.50x | $-4.50 Million | $1.80 Million | — |