Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.52x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-15.07 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($28.74 Million) in one year. See Geospace Technologies Corporation free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Geospace Technologies Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Geospace Technologies Corporation across 29 annual periods. Also explore GEOS year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Geospace Technologies Corporation (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Geospace Technologies Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Geospace Technologies Corporation market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.81x | $-22.23 Million | $27.53 Million | ▼ -56.2% |
| 2024 | -0.52x | $-9.08 Million | $17.57 Million | ▼ -167.5% |
| 2023 | 0.77x | $15.56 Million | $20.33 Million | ▲ +202.3% |
| 2022 | -0.75x | $-10.04 Million | $13.41 Million | ▼ -124.1% |
| 2021 | -0.33x | $-7.17 Million | $21.47 Million | ▼ -147.7% |
| 2020 | 0.70x | $18.12 Million | $25.88 Million | ▲ +188.1% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | $5.63 Million | $23.15 Million | ▲ +152.6% |
| 2018 | -0.46x | $-10.40 Million | $22.49 Million | ▼ -148.3% |
| 2017 | 0.96x | $10.09 Million | $10.54 Million | ▲ +682.0% |
| 2016 | -0.16x | $-1.70 Million | $10.30 Million | ▲ +74.8% |
| 2015 | -0.65x | $-11.37 Million | $17.42 Million | ▼ -124.8% |
| 2014 | 2.63x | $67.65 Million | $25.73 Million | ▲ +275.6% |
| 2013 | -1.50x | $-57.16 Million | $38.17 Million | ▼ -252.6% |
| 2012 | 0.98x | $43.22 Million | $44.03 Million | ▲ +1609.8% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $1.14 Million | $19.79 Million | ▼ -94.9% |
| 2010 | 1.12x | $30.02 Million | $26.91 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 2009 | 0.76x | $17.34 Million | $22.82 Million | ▲ +497.9% |
| 2008 | -0.19x | $-8.02 Million | $42.02 Million | ▼ -139.7% |
| 2007 | 0.48x | $12.40 Million | $25.79 Million | ▲ +200.2% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $5.35 Million | $33.41 Million | ▲ +313.2% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | $-1.62 Million | $21.63 Million | ▼ -116.5% |
| 2004 | 0.45x | $8.38 Million | $18.45 Million | ▲ +428.9% |
| 2003 | -0.14x | $-2.60 Million | $18.84 Million | ▼ -129.0% |
| 2002 | 0.48x | $6.55 Million | $13.73 Million | ▲ +270.5% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $2.61 Million | $20.30 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | $4.83 Million | $14.40 Million | ▲ +34.1% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $3.00 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +44.8% |
| 1998 | 0.17x | $2.40 Million | $13.90 Million | ▼ -82.7% |
| 1997 | 1.00x | $10.00 Million | $10.00 Million | — |