Geospace Technologies Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Geospace Technologies Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($31.58 Million) in one year. Check GEOS operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Geospace Technologies Corporation (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Geospace Technologies Corporation from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Geospace Technologies Corporation across 29 annual periods. Check GEOS cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Geospace Technologies Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Geospace Technologies Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Geospace Technologies Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.81x | $-22.23 Million | $27.53 Million | ▼ -56.2% |
| 2024 | -0.52x | $-9.08 Million | $17.57 Million | ▼ -167.5% |
| 2023 | 0.77x | $15.56 Million | $20.33 Million | ▲ +202.3% |
| 2022 | -0.75x | $-10.04 Million | $13.41 Million | ▼ -124.1% |
| 2021 | -0.33x | $-7.17 Million | $21.47 Million | ▼ -147.7% |
| 2020 | 0.70x | $18.12 Million | $25.88 Million | ▲ +188.1% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | $5.63 Million | $23.15 Million | ▲ +152.6% |
| 2018 | -0.46x | $-10.40 Million | $22.49 Million | ▼ -148.3% |
| 2017 | 0.96x | $10.09 Million | $10.54 Million | ▲ +682.0% |
| 2016 | -0.16x | $-1.70 Million | $10.30 Million | ▲ +74.8% |
| 2015 | -0.65x | $-11.37 Million | $17.42 Million | ▼ -124.8% |
| 2014 | 2.63x | $67.65 Million | $25.73 Million | ▲ +275.6% |
| 2013 | -1.50x | $-57.16 Million | $38.17 Million | ▼ -252.6% |
| 2012 | 0.98x | $43.22 Million | $44.03 Million | ▲ +1609.8% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $1.14 Million | $19.79 Million | ▼ -94.9% |
| 2010 | 1.12x | $30.02 Million | $26.91 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 2009 | 0.76x | $17.34 Million | $22.82 Million | ▲ +497.9% |
| 2008 | -0.19x | $-8.02 Million | $42.02 Million | ▼ -139.7% |
| 2007 | 0.48x | $12.40 Million | $25.79 Million | ▲ +200.2% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $5.35 Million | $33.41 Million | ▲ +313.2% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | $-1.62 Million | $21.63 Million | ▼ -116.5% |
| 2004 | 0.45x | $8.38 Million | $18.45 Million | ▲ +428.9% |
| 2003 | -0.14x | $-2.60 Million | $18.84 Million | ▼ -129.0% |
| 2002 | 0.48x | $6.55 Million | $13.73 Million | ▲ +270.5% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $2.61 Million | $20.30 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | $4.83 Million | $14.40 Million | ▲ +34.1% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $3.00 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +44.8% |
| 1998 | 0.17x | $2.40 Million | $13.90 Million | ▼ -82.7% |
| 1997 | 1.00x | $10.00 Million | $10.00 Million | — |