Geron Corporation (GERN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Geron Corporation (GERN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-13.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($318.68 Million) in one year. See GERN free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Geron Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Geron Corporation across 29 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Geron Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Geron Corporation (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Geron Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GERN company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.70x | $-218.62 Million | $313.46 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2023 | -1.15x | $-167.74 Million | $146.13 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2022 | -1.15x | $-127.38 Million | $110.58 Million | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2021 | -0.96x | $-95.56 Million | $99.62 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2020 | -1.11x | $-66.65 Million | $59.78 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2019 | -1.44x | $-43.83 Million | $30.36 Million | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2018 | -2.78x | $-21.01 Million | $7.55 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2017 | -3.15x | $-20.56 Million | $6.52 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2016 | -2.33x | $-18.37 Million | $7.87 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2015 | -3.65x | $-24.20 Million | $6.63 Million | ▼ -1730.5% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $9.35 Million | $41.80 Million | ▲ +104.6% |
| 2013 | -4.83x | $-36.68 Million | $7.59 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2012 | -3.90x | $-55.15 Million | $14.15 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2011 | -4.64x | $-62.39 Million | $13.44 Million | ▼ -328.0% |
| 2010 | -1.08x | $-44.29 Million | $40.85 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2009 | -5.56x | $-43.37 Million | $7.80 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2008 | -5.41x | $-41.98 Million | $7.76 Million | ▼ -168.5% |
| 2007 | -2.01x | $-26.63 Million | $13.22 Million | ▼ -258.0% |
| 2006 | -0.56x | $-26.38 Million | $46.88 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2005 | -1.96x | $-20.61 Million | $10.54 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | $-25.93 Million | $9.81 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2003 | -2.07x | $-24.40 Million | $11.79 Million | ▼ -104.2% |
| 2002 | -1.01x | $-31.34 Million | $30.93 Million | ▼ -56.8% |
| 2001 | -0.65x | $-22.42 Million | $34.69 Million | ▼ -138.1% |
| 2000 | -0.27x | $-13.61 Million | $50.11 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 1999 | -0.36x | $-13.60 Million | $37.50 Million | ▲ +45.6% |
| 1998 | -0.67x | $-7.80 Million | $11.70 Million | ▲ +57.8% |
| 1997 | -1.58x | $-7.90 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 1996 | -1.90x | $-9.90 Million | $5.20 Million | — |