Geron Corporation (GERN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Geron Corporation (GERN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-15.83 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($300.39 Million) in one year. See Geron Corporation (GERN) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Geron Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Geron Corporation across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Geron Corporation cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Geron Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Geron Corporation. Check Geron Corporation cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.32x | $-111.04 Million | $344.67 Million | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2024 | -0.70x | $-218.62 Million | $313.46 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2023 | -1.15x | $-167.74 Million | $146.13 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2022 | -1.15x | $-127.38 Million | $110.58 Million | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2021 | -0.96x | $-95.56 Million | $99.62 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2020 | -1.11x | $-66.65 Million | $59.78 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2019 | -1.44x | $-43.83 Million | $30.36 Million | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2018 | -2.78x | $-21.01 Million | $7.55 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2017 | -3.15x | $-20.56 Million | $6.52 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2016 | -2.33x | $-18.37 Million | $7.87 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2015 | -3.65x | $-24.20 Million | $6.63 Million | ▼ -1730.5% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $9.35 Million | $41.80 Million | ▲ +104.6% |
| 2013 | -4.83x | $-36.68 Million | $7.59 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2012 | -3.90x | $-55.15 Million | $14.15 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2011 | -4.64x | $-62.39 Million | $13.44 Million | ▼ -328.0% |
| 2010 | -1.08x | $-44.29 Million | $40.85 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2009 | -5.56x | $-43.37 Million | $7.80 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2008 | -5.41x | $-41.98 Million | $7.76 Million | ▼ -168.5% |
| 2007 | -2.01x | $-26.63 Million | $13.22 Million | ▼ -258.0% |
| 2006 | -0.56x | $-26.38 Million | $46.88 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2005 | -1.96x | $-20.61 Million | $10.54 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | $-25.93 Million | $9.81 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2003 | -2.07x | $-24.40 Million | $11.79 Million | ▼ -104.2% |
| 2002 | -1.01x | $-31.34 Million | $30.93 Million | ▼ -56.8% |
| 2001 | -0.65x | $-22.42 Million | $34.69 Million | ▼ -138.1% |
| 2000 | -0.27x | $-13.61 Million | $50.11 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 1999 | -0.36x | $-13.60 Million | $37.50 Million | ▲ +45.6% |
| 1998 | -0.67x | $-7.80 Million | $11.70 Million | ▲ +57.8% |
| 1997 | -1.58x | $-7.90 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 1996 | -1.90x | $-9.90 Million | $5.20 Million | — |