Geron Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Geron Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Geron Corporation (GERN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-15.83 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($300.39 Million) in one year. Check Geron Corporation cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Geron Corporation (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Geron Corporation from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Geron Corporation across 30 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Geron Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Geron Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Geron Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Geron Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Geron Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.32x | $-111.04 Million | $344.67 Million | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2024 | -0.70x | $-218.62 Million | $313.46 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2023 | -1.15x | $-167.74 Million | $146.13 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2022 | -1.15x | $-127.38 Million | $110.58 Million | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2021 | -0.96x | $-95.56 Million | $99.62 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2020 | -1.11x | $-66.65 Million | $59.78 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2019 | -1.44x | $-43.83 Million | $30.36 Million | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2018 | -2.78x | $-21.01 Million | $7.55 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2017 | -3.15x | $-20.56 Million | $6.52 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2016 | -2.33x | $-18.37 Million | $7.87 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2015 | -3.65x | $-24.20 Million | $6.63 Million | ▼ -1730.5% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $9.35 Million | $41.80 Million | ▲ +104.6% |
| 2013 | -4.83x | $-36.68 Million | $7.59 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2012 | -3.90x | $-55.15 Million | $14.15 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2011 | -4.64x | $-62.39 Million | $13.44 Million | ▼ -328.0% |
| 2010 | -1.08x | $-44.29 Million | $40.85 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2009 | -5.56x | $-43.37 Million | $7.80 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2008 | -5.41x | $-41.98 Million | $7.76 Million | ▼ -168.5% |
| 2007 | -2.01x | $-26.63 Million | $13.22 Million | ▼ -258.0% |
| 2006 | -0.56x | $-26.38 Million | $46.88 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2005 | -1.96x | $-20.61 Million | $10.54 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | $-25.93 Million | $9.81 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2003 | -2.07x | $-24.40 Million | $11.79 Million | ▼ -104.2% |
| 2002 | -1.01x | $-31.34 Million | $30.93 Million | ▼ -56.8% |
| 2001 | -0.65x | $-22.42 Million | $34.69 Million | ▼ -138.1% |
| 2000 | -0.27x | $-13.61 Million | $50.11 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 1999 | -0.36x | $-13.60 Million | $37.50 Million | ▲ +45.6% |
| 1998 | -0.67x | $-7.80 Million | $11.70 Million | ▲ +57.8% |
| 1997 | -1.58x | $-7.90 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 1996 | -1.90x | $-9.90 Million | $5.20 Million | — |