Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $16.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($442.46 Million) in one year. Explore GLAD strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gladstone Capital Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gladstone Capital Corporation across 25 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Gladstone Capital Corporation for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gladstone Capital Corporation (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gladstone Capital Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Gladstone Capital Corporation stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $43.63 Million | $425.56 Million | ▲ +955.9% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $3.24 Million | $333.73 Million | ▲ +127.8% |
| 2023 | -0.03x | $-10.86 Million | $310.80 Million | ▲ +84.2% |
| 2022 | -0.22x | $-76.40 Million | $345.48 Million | ▼ -290.1% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | $-14.06 Million | $248.06 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2020 | -0.20x | $-46.09 Million | $225.43 Million | ▼ -490.4% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $9.26 Million | $176.74 Million | ▲ +147.8% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-17.80 Million | $162.42 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2017 | -0.09x | $-12.88 Million | $146.21 Million | ▼ -120.0% |
| 2016 | 0.44x | $60.02 Million | $135.97 Million | ▲ +213.2% |
| 2015 | -0.39x | $-74.48 Million | $191.04 Million | ▼ -8488.2% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $473.00K | $101.77 Million | ▼ -98.7% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $32.14 Million | $89.10 Million | ▲ +44.3% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $26.20 Million | $104.84 Million | ▲ +138.0% |
| 2011 | -0.66x | $-68.37 Million | $103.90 Million | ▼ -116.2% |
| 2010 | 4.07x | $86.50 Million | $21.27 Million | ▲ +269.7% |
| 2009 | 1.10x | $95.52 Million | $86.83 Million | ▲ +311.1% |
| 2008 | -0.52x | $-80.22 Million | $153.95 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2007 | -0.80x | $-116.98 Million | $146.77 Million | ▼ -686.1% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $7.24 Million | $53.21 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $15.59 Million | $54.18 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $13.48 Million | $63.11 Million | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $9.88 Million | $83.76 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $6.97 Million | $42.26 Million | ▲ +306.8% |
| 2001 | -0.08x | $-76.30K | $956.34K | — |