Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-54.12 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($438.76 Million) in one year. See Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gladstone Capital Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gladstone Capital Corporation across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Gladstone Capital Corporation cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gladstone Capital Corporation (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gladstone Capital Corporation. Check Gladstone Capital Corporation earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $43.63 Million | $425.56 Million | ▲ +955.9% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $3.24 Million | $333.73 Million | ▲ +127.8% |
| 2023 | -0.03x | $-10.86 Million | $310.80 Million | ▲ +84.2% |
| 2022 | -0.22x | $-76.40 Million | $345.48 Million | ▼ -290.1% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | $-14.06 Million | $248.06 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2020 | -0.20x | $-46.09 Million | $225.43 Million | ▼ -490.4% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $9.26 Million | $176.74 Million | ▲ +147.8% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-17.80 Million | $162.42 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2017 | -0.09x | $-12.88 Million | $146.21 Million | ▼ -120.0% |
| 2016 | 0.44x | $60.02 Million | $135.97 Million | ▲ +213.2% |
| 2015 | -0.39x | $-74.48 Million | $191.04 Million | ▼ -8488.2% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $473.00K | $101.77 Million | ▼ -98.7% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $32.14 Million | $89.10 Million | ▲ +44.3% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $26.20 Million | $104.84 Million | ▲ +138.0% |
| 2011 | -0.66x | $-68.37 Million | $103.90 Million | ▼ -116.2% |
| 2010 | 4.07x | $86.50 Million | $21.27 Million | ▲ +269.7% |
| 2009 | 1.10x | $95.52 Million | $86.83 Million | ▲ +311.1% |
| 2008 | -0.52x | $-80.22 Million | $153.95 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2007 | -0.80x | $-116.98 Million | $146.77 Million | ▼ -686.1% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $7.24 Million | $53.21 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $15.59 Million | $54.18 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $13.48 Million | $63.11 Million | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $9.88 Million | $83.76 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $6.97 Million | $42.26 Million | ▲ +306.8% |
| 2001 | -0.08x | $-76.30K | $956.34K | — |