Gladstone Capital Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gladstone Capital Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-54.12 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($438.76 Million) in one year. Check GLAD cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Gladstone Capital Corporation (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Gladstone Capital Corporation from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Gladstone Capital Corporation across 25 annual periods. Check Gladstone Capital Corporation total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Gladstone Capital Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Gladstone Capital Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gladstone Capital Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GLAD operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $43.63 Million | $425.56 Million | ▲ +955.9% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $3.24 Million | $333.73 Million | ▲ +127.8% |
| 2023 | -0.03x | $-10.86 Million | $310.80 Million | ▲ +84.2% |
| 2022 | -0.22x | $-76.40 Million | $345.48 Million | ▼ -290.1% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | $-14.06 Million | $248.06 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2020 | -0.20x | $-46.09 Million | $225.43 Million | ▼ -490.4% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $9.26 Million | $176.74 Million | ▲ +147.8% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-17.80 Million | $162.42 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2017 | -0.09x | $-12.88 Million | $146.21 Million | ▼ -120.0% |
| 2016 | 0.44x | $60.02 Million | $135.97 Million | ▲ +213.2% |
| 2015 | -0.39x | $-74.48 Million | $191.04 Million | ▼ -8488.2% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $473.00K | $101.77 Million | ▼ -98.7% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $32.14 Million | $89.10 Million | ▲ +44.3% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $26.20 Million | $104.84 Million | ▲ +138.0% |
| 2011 | -0.66x | $-68.37 Million | $103.90 Million | ▼ -116.2% |
| 2010 | 4.07x | $86.50 Million | $21.27 Million | ▲ +269.7% |
| 2009 | 1.10x | $95.52 Million | $86.83 Million | ▲ +311.1% |
| 2008 | -0.52x | $-80.22 Million | $153.95 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2007 | -0.80x | $-116.98 Million | $146.77 Million | ▼ -686.1% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $7.24 Million | $53.21 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $15.59 Million | $54.18 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $13.48 Million | $63.11 Million | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $9.88 Million | $83.76 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $6.97 Million | $42.26 Million | ▲ +306.8% |
| 2001 | -0.08x | $-76.30K | $956.34K | — |