Genasys Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Genasys Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Genasys Inc (GNSS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.93 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($59.57 Million) in one year. Check GNSS cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Genasys Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Genasys Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Genasys Inc across 30 annual periods. Check GNSS capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Genasys Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Genasys Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Genasys Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Genasys Inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.14x | $-8.76 Million | $61.70 Million | ▲ +73.4% |
| 2024 | -0.53x | $-19.45 Million | $36.37 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2023 | -0.60x | $-9.59 Million | $16.09 Million | ▼ -2833.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $468.00K | $21.46 Million | ▼ -91.4% |
| 2021 | 0.25x | $6.15 Million | $24.17 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2020 | 0.41x | $6.92 Million | $17.03 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2019 | 0.84x | $9.86 Million | $11.74 Million | ▲ +461.4% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $1.25 Million | $8.37 Million | ▲ +182.4% |
| 2017 | -0.18x | $-666.77K | $3.67 Million | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2016 | -0.51x | $-1.15 Million | $2.24 Million | ▼ -749.8% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $135.81K | $1.72 Million | ▼ -95.2% |
| 2014 | 1.66x | $8.40 Million | $5.08 Million | ▲ +163.8% |
| 2013 | 0.63x | $1.76 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +541.0% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $194.18K | $1.98 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2011 | 0.95x | $4.02 Million | $4.23 Million | ▲ +628.1% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $369.97K | $2.83 Million | ▼ -85.0% |
| 2009 | 0.87x | $2.58 Million | $2.97 Million | ▲ +149.4% |
| 2008 | -1.76x | $-3.41 Million | $1.94 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2007 | -2.52x | $-4.13 Million | $1.64 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2006 | -2.11x | $-10.79 Million | $5.10 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2005 | -1.67x | $-8.80 Million | $5.27 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2004 | -2.46x | $-6.03 Million | $2.45 Million | ▲ +9.2% |
| 2003 | -2.71x | $-5.46 Million | $2.02 Million | ▼ -369.9% |
| 2002 | -0.58x | $-2.69 Million | $4.67 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2001 | -4.30x | $-3.63 Million | $843.79K | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2000 | -8.28x | $-3.69 Million | $445.74K | ▼ -42.8% |
| 1999 | -5.80x | $-2.90 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +30.4% |
| 1998 | -8.33x | $-2.50 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -196.2% |
| 1997 | -2.81x | $-1.57 Million | $558.96K | ▼ -69.3% |
| 1996 | -1.66x | $-611.35K | $367.99K | — |