Genasys Inc (GNSS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Genasys Inc (GNSS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $7.20 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($65.84 Million) in one year. See GNSS free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Genasys Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Genasys Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore GNSS shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Genasys Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Genasys Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GNSS market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.14x | $-8.76 Million | $61.70 Million | ▲ +73.4% |
| 2024 | -0.53x | $-19.45 Million | $36.37 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2023 | -0.60x | $-9.59 Million | $16.09 Million | ▼ -2833.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $468.00K | $21.46 Million | ▼ -91.4% |
| 2021 | 0.25x | $6.15 Million | $24.17 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2020 | 0.41x | $6.92 Million | $17.03 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2019 | 0.84x | $9.86 Million | $11.74 Million | ▲ +461.4% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $1.25 Million | $8.37 Million | ▲ +182.4% |
| 2017 | -0.18x | $-666.77K | $3.67 Million | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2016 | -0.51x | $-1.15 Million | $2.24 Million | ▼ -749.8% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $135.81K | $1.72 Million | ▼ -95.2% |
| 2014 | 1.66x | $8.40 Million | $5.08 Million | ▲ +163.8% |
| 2013 | 0.63x | $1.76 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +541.0% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $194.18K | $1.98 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2011 | 0.95x | $4.02 Million | $4.23 Million | ▲ +628.1% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $369.97K | $2.83 Million | ▼ -85.0% |
| 2009 | 0.87x | $2.58 Million | $2.97 Million | ▲ +149.4% |
| 2008 | -1.76x | $-3.41 Million | $1.94 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2007 | -2.52x | $-4.13 Million | $1.64 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2006 | -2.11x | $-10.79 Million | $5.10 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2005 | -1.67x | $-8.80 Million | $5.27 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2004 | -2.46x | $-6.03 Million | $2.45 Million | ▲ +9.2% |
| 2003 | -2.71x | $-5.46 Million | $2.02 Million | ▼ -369.9% |
| 2002 | -0.58x | $-2.69 Million | $4.67 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2001 | -4.30x | $-3.63 Million | $843.79K | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2000 | -8.28x | $-3.69 Million | $445.74K | ▼ -42.8% |
| 1999 | -5.80x | $-2.90 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +30.4% |
| 1998 | -8.33x | $-2.50 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -196.2% |
| 1997 | -2.81x | $-1.57 Million | $558.96K | ▼ -69.3% |
| 1996 | -1.66x | $-611.35K | $367.99K | — |