Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $17.91 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.07 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Gladstone Commercial Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gladstone Commercial Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2003–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gladstone Commercial Corporation across 23 annual periods. Also explore Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (2003–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gladstone Commercial Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Gladstone Commercial Corporation worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $88.15 Million | $905.00 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $56.95 Million | $923.05 Million | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $60.37 Million | $979.21 Million | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $69.18 Million | $996.94 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $70.13 Million | $940.79 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $65.49 Million | $881.87 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $60.19 Million | $828.47 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $55.60 Million | $684.36 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $46.84 Million | $661.66 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $41.16 Million | $611.87 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $31.49 Million | $599.45 Million | ▲ +6.2% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $28.20 Million | $570.12 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $19.89 Million | $507.38 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $23.41 Million | $442.41 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $19.66 Million | $317.83 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $18.11 Million | $299.23 Million | ▲ +6.2% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $17.01 Million | $298.41 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | $17.58 Million | $298.60 Million | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $16.10 Million | $236.53 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $12.02 Million | $163.54 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $7.56 Million | $108.10 Million | ▼ -93.1% |
| 2004 | 1.02x | $2.95 Million | $2.90 Million | ▲ +264.5% |
| 2003 | -0.62x | $-192.18K | $310.71K | — |