GeoVax Labs Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
GeoVax Labs Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. GeoVax Labs Inc (GOVX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -3.41x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.21 Million could theoretically repay -3% of its total liabilities ($1.82 Million) in one year. Check GeoVax Labs Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of GeoVax Labs Inc (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of GeoVax Labs Inc from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for GeoVax Labs Inc across 28 annual periods. Check GeoVax Labs Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
GeoVax Labs Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
GeoVax Labs Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for GeoVax Labs Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GOVX cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -7.94x | $-24.68 Million | $3.11 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2023 | -7.15x | $-25.17 Million | $3.52 Million | ▼ -78.4% |
| 2022 | -4.01x | $-19.03 Million | $4.75 Million | ▼ -166.2% |
| 2021 | -1.51x | $-11.20 Million | $7.43 Million | ▲ +54.8% |
| 2020 | -3.33x | $-2.75 Million | $825.00K | ▼ -387.2% |
| 2019 | -0.68x | $-1.40 Million | $2.04 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2018 | -0.93x | $-1.54 Million | $1.66 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2017 | -2.08x | $-1.69 Million | $811.29K | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2016 | -5.26x | $-1.95 Million | $369.85K | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2015 | -21.30x | $-2.71 Million | $126.99K | ▼ -77.1% |
| 2014 | -12.03x | $-2.25 Million | $187.02K | ▼ -121.8% |
| 2013 | -5.43x | $-1.69 Million | $312.35K | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2012 | -7.46x | $-2.44 Million | $327.04K | ▼ -2214.8% |
| 2011 | -0.32x | $-303.62K | $941.53K | ▲ +91.6% |
| 2010 | -3.85x | $-2.01 Million | $521.61K | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2009 | -2.49x | $-1.43 Million | $571.37K | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2008 | -6.84x | $-2.37 Million | $346.42K | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2007 | -5.46x | $-3.27 Million | $598.54K | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2006 | -6.88x | $-1.33 Million | $193.11K | ▼ -2692.9% |
| 2005 | -0.25x | $-1.43 Million | $5.79 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2004 | -0.25x | $-1.23 Million | $4.97 Million | ▼ -444.1% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $288.31K | $3.99 Million | ▲ +103.2% |
| 2001 | -2.25x | $-4.21 Million | $1.87 Million | ▲ +77.2% |
| 2000 | -9.89x | $-6.33 Million | $639.91K | ▼ -525.5% |
| 1999 | -1.58x | $-4.46 Million | $2.82 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 1998 | -1.40x | $-5.35 Million | $3.83 Million | ▲ +9.1% |
| 1997 | -1.54x | $-2.45 Million | $1.59 Million | ▲ +59.2% |
| 1996 | -3.76x | $-1.17 Million | $309.96K | — |