Visionary Education Technology Holdings Group Inc. (GV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Visionary Education Technology Holdings Group Inc. (GV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.82 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($58.43 Million) in one year. See Visionary Education Technology Holdings financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Visionary Education Technology Holdings Group Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Visionary Education Technology Holdings Group Inc. across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GV cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Visionary Education Technology Holdings Group Inc. (1996–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Visionary Education Technology Holdings Group Inc.. Check Visionary Education Technology Holdings (GV) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.05x | $-2.97 Million | $58.43 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2024 | -0.06x | $-4.10 Million | $70.11 Million | ▼ -1554.6% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $335.92K | $83.48 Million | ▼ -97.9% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $6.36 Million | $32.55 Million | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2021 | 0.43x | $4.44 Million | $10.44 Million | ▲ +1105.5% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $273.63K | $7.75 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $6.82 Million | $52.94 Million | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $8.20 Million | $37.08 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2017 | 0.42x | $18.06 Million | $43.05 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $5.57 Million | $45.91 Million | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $7.80 Million | $49.21 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $10.39 Million | $46.50 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $9.96 Million | $29.83 Million | ▲ +221.3% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $1.17 Million | $11.28 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2011 | 0.57x | $3.69 Million | $6.50 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2010 | 0.51x | $3.53 Million | $6.95 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2009 | 0.50x | $4.44 Million | $8.86 Million | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2008 | 0.31x | $3.32 Million | $10.84 Million | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2007 | 0.20x | $3.51 Million | $17.56 Million | ▲ +139.0% |
| 2006 | -0.51x | $-6.16 Million | $12.00 Million | ▼ -138.0% |
| 2005 | 1.35x | $5.87 Million | $4.35 Million | ▲ +794.9% |
| 2004 | -0.19x | $-800.82K | $4.12 Million | ▼ -116.0% |
| 2003 | 1.22x | $2.77 Million | $2.28 Million | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2002 | 0.74x | $2.44 Million | $3.30 Million | ▲ +290.3% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $364.58K | $1.92 Million | ▼ -93.1% |
| 2000 | 2.75x | $4.40 Million | $1.60 Million | ▲ +885.7% |
| 1999 | -0.35x | $-700.00K | $2.00 Million | ▼ -142.0% |
| 1998 | 0.83x | $1.00 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +54.8% |
| 1997 | 0.54x | $700.00K | $1.30 Million | ▲ +638.5% |
| 1996 | -0.10x | $-100.00K | $1.00 Million | — |