Visionary Education Technology Holdings Group Inc. (GV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Visionary Education Technology Holdings Group Inc. (GV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.82 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($58.43 Million) in one year. See Visionary Education Technology Holdings free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Visionary Education Technology Holdings Group Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Visionary Education Technology Holdings Group Inc. across 30 annual periods. Also explore Visionary Education Technology Holdings annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Visionary Education Technology Holdings Group Inc. (1996–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Visionary Education Technology Holdings Group Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GV market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.05x | $-2.97 Million | $58.43 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2024 | -0.06x | $-4.10 Million | $70.11 Million | ▼ -1554.6% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $335.92K | $83.48 Million | ▼ -97.9% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $6.36 Million | $32.55 Million | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2021 | 0.43x | $4.44 Million | $10.44 Million | ▲ +1105.5% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $273.63K | $7.75 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $6.82 Million | $52.94 Million | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $8.20 Million | $37.08 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2017 | 0.42x | $18.06 Million | $43.05 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $5.57 Million | $45.91 Million | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $7.80 Million | $49.21 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $10.39 Million | $46.50 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $9.96 Million | $29.83 Million | ▲ +221.3% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $1.17 Million | $11.28 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2011 | 0.57x | $3.69 Million | $6.50 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2010 | 0.51x | $3.53 Million | $6.95 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2009 | 0.50x | $4.44 Million | $8.86 Million | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2008 | 0.31x | $3.32 Million | $10.84 Million | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2007 | 0.20x | $3.51 Million | $17.56 Million | ▲ +139.0% |
| 2006 | -0.51x | $-6.16 Million | $12.00 Million | ▼ -138.0% |
| 2005 | 1.35x | $5.87 Million | $4.35 Million | ▲ +794.9% |
| 2004 | -0.19x | $-800.82K | $4.12 Million | ▼ -116.0% |
| 2003 | 1.22x | $2.77 Million | $2.28 Million | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2002 | 0.74x | $2.44 Million | $3.30 Million | ▲ +290.3% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $364.58K | $1.92 Million | ▼ -93.1% |
| 2000 | 2.75x | $4.40 Million | $1.60 Million | ▲ +885.7% |
| 1999 | -0.35x | $-700.00K | $2.00 Million | ▼ -142.0% |
| 1998 | 0.83x | $1.00 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +54.8% |
| 1997 | 0.54x | $700.00K | $1.30 Million | ▲ +638.5% |
| 1996 | -0.10x | $-100.00K | $1.00 Million | — |