Gyrodyne Company of America Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gyrodyne Company of America Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Gyrodyne Company of America Inc (GYRO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -112.78x as of December 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.01 Billion could theoretically repay -113% of its total liabilities ($26.68 Million) in one year. Check GYRO cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Gyrodyne Company of America Inc (1991–2022)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Gyrodyne Company of America Inc from 1991 to 2022. Historical debt coverage capacity for Gyrodyne Company of America Inc across 25 annual periods. Check GYRO cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Gyrodyne Company of America Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2022)
Gyrodyne Company of America Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2022. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gyrodyne Company of America Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Gyrodyne Company of America Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 52.52x | $1.45 Billion | $27.52 Million | ▲ +22041692.2% |
| 2015 | 0.00x | $-3.44K | $14.44 Million | ▲ +99.9% |
| 2014 | -0.27x | $-5.47 Million | $20.42 Million | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2013 | -0.35x | $-8.11 Million | $22.98 Million | ▼ -115.2% |
| 2012 | 2.32x | $161.71 Million | $69.75 Million | ▲ +11670.4% |
| 2011 | -0.02x | $-477.27K | $23.82 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2010 | -0.01x | $-346.94K | $24.81 Million | ▲ +82.4% |
| 2009 | -0.08x | $-1.71 Million | $21.47 Million | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2008 | -0.07x | $-1.26 Million | $17.50 Million | ▲ +71.7% |
| 2007 | -0.25x | $-3.65 Million | $14.40 Million | ▼ -111.0% |
| 2005 | 2.30x | $24.03 Million | $10.44 Million | ▲ +750.6% |
| 2004 | -0.35x | $-1.13 Million | $3.19 Million | ▼ -48.3% |
| 2003 | -0.24x | $-1.07 Million | $4.47 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | $-1.34 Million | $5.15 Million | ▼ -278.5% |
| 2001 | -0.07x | $-244.67K | $3.56 Million | ▼ -113.7% |
| 2000 | 0.50x | $1.38 Million | $2.75 Million | ▲ +226.8% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $348.00K | $2.27 Million | ▼ -57.3% |
| 1998 | 0.36x | $900.00K | $2.50 Million | ▲ +164.0% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $300.00K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +63.6% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $200.00K | $2.40 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $300.00K | $2.60 Million | ▲ +173.1% |
| 1994 | -0.16x | $-300.00K | $1.90 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 1993 | -0.15x | $-300.00K | $2.00 Million | ▼ -212.5% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | $200.00K | $1.50 Million | ▲ +153.3% |
| 1991 | -0.25x | $-200.00K | $800.00K | — |