The Hackett Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
The Hackett Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. The Hackett Group Inc (HCKT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $15.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($140.43 Million) in one year. Check how aggressively does The Hackett Group Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of The Hackett Group Inc (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of The Hackett Group Inc from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for The Hackett Group Inc across 28 annual periods. Check HCKT cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
The Hackett Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
The Hackett Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for The Hackett Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see HCKT cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.30x | $40.30 Million | $136.54 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2024 | 0.63x | $47.73 Million | $76.30 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $37.40 Million | $91.35 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2022 | 0.46x | $58.90 Million | $126.72 Million | ▼ -36.1% |
| 2021 | 0.73x | $46.35 Million | $63.69 Million | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2020 | 0.85x | $44.06 Million | $51.66 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2019 | 0.75x | $42.36 Million | $56.12 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2018 | 0.57x | $32.41 Million | $57.16 Million | ▲ +66.7% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | $26.51 Million | $77.96 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $32.89 Million | $72.62 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2015 | 0.62x | $36.18 Million | $58.23 Million | ▲ +109.2% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $18.76 Million | $63.17 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2013 | 0.45x | $25.43 Million | $57.14 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | $20.35 Million | $59.20 Million | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | $20.32 Million | $37.18 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2010 | 0.52x | $19.54 Million | $37.56 Million | ▲ +330.5% |
| 2009 | -0.23x | $-8.64 Million | $38.28 Million | ▼ -132.6% |
| 2008 | 0.69x | $27.47 Million | $39.75 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2007 | 0.59x | $21.56 Million | $36.64 Million | ▲ +197.1% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $6.81 Million | $34.39 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $5.71 Million | $51.00 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $2.44 Million | $28.88 Million | ▼ -74.3% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $9.87 Million | $29.99 Million | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $7.03 Million | $32.31 Million | ▼ -52.0% |
| 2001 | 0.45x | $15.52 Million | $34.22 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2000 | 0.36x | $20.16 Million | $56.62 Million | ▲ +194.6% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $7.30 Million | $60.40 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 1998 | 0.30x | $5.80 Million | $19.50 Million | — |