The Hackett Group Inc (HCKT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
The Hackett Group Inc (HCKT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $19.07 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($136.54 Million) in one year. See The Hackett Group Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
The Hackett Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for The Hackett Group Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore HCKT year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for The Hackett Group Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for The Hackett Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see The Hackett Group Inc (HCKT) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.30x | $40.30 Million | $136.54 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2024 | 0.63x | $47.73 Million | $76.30 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $37.40 Million | $91.35 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2022 | 0.46x | $58.90 Million | $126.72 Million | ▼ -36.1% |
| 2021 | 0.73x | $46.35 Million | $63.69 Million | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2020 | 0.85x | $44.06 Million | $51.66 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2019 | 0.75x | $42.36 Million | $56.12 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2018 | 0.57x | $32.41 Million | $57.16 Million | ▲ +66.7% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | $26.51 Million | $77.96 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $32.89 Million | $72.62 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2015 | 0.62x | $36.18 Million | $58.23 Million | ▲ +145.1% |
| 2014 | 0.25x | $16.01 Million | $63.17 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2013 | 0.42x | $24.26 Million | $57.14 Million | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | $20.35 Million | $59.20 Million | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | $20.32 Million | $37.18 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2010 | 0.52x | $19.54 Million | $37.56 Million | ▲ +330.5% |
| 2009 | -0.23x | $-8.64 Million | $38.28 Million | ▼ -132.6% |
| 2008 | 0.69x | $27.47 Million | $39.75 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2007 | 0.59x | $21.56 Million | $36.64 Million | ▲ +201.5% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $6.71 Million | $34.39 Million | ▲ +74.4% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $5.71 Million | $51.00 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $2.44 Million | $28.88 Million | ▼ -74.3% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $9.87 Million | $29.99 Million | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $7.03 Million | $32.31 Million | ▼ -52.0% |
| 2001 | 0.45x | $15.52 Million | $34.22 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2000 | 0.36x | $20.16 Million | $56.62 Million | ▲ +194.6% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $7.30 Million | $60.40 Million | ▼ -34.5% |
| 1998 | 0.18x | $3.60 Million | $19.50 Million | — |