Hudson Technologies Inc (HDSN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hudson Technologies Inc (HDSN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.18x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-12.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($71.25 Million) in one year. Explore Hudson Technologies Inc strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hudson Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hudson Technologies Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore HDSN total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hudson Technologies Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hudson Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Hudson Technologies Inc (HDSN) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.04x | $-3.16 Million | $75.26 Million | ▼ -102.6% |
| 2024 | 1.62x | $91.81 Million | $56.80 Million | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2023 | 0.86x | $58.55 Million | $67.90 Million | ▲ +34.0% |
| 2022 | 0.64x | $62.81 Million | $97.62 Million | ▲ +7686.3% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-1.23 Million | $144.78 Million | ▼ -108.8% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $11.69 Million | $121.03 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | $33.82 Million | $135.04 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $36.33 Million | $159.13 Million | ▲ +146.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $18.37 Million | $197.99 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2016 | 0.89x | $9.35 Million | $10.45 Million | ▲ +403.0% |
| 2015 | -0.30x | $-10.50 Million | $35.59 Million | ▼ -376.5% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $1.70 Million | $15.94 Million | ▲ +140.4% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-6.42 Million | $24.28 Million | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | $-9.27 Million | $24.54 Million | ▼ -864.7% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $613.00K | $12.41 Million | ▼ -79.4% |
| 2010 | 0.24x | $3.13 Million | $13.07 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $3.36 Million | $14.33 Million | ▲ +211.1% |
| 2008 | -0.21x | $-4.39 Million | $20.79 Million | ▼ -864.0% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $382.00K | $13.82 Million | ▲ +122.2% |
| 2006 | -0.12x | $-1.21 Million | $9.71 Million | ▼ -815.9% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $106.00K | $6.11 Million | ▼ -91.3% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $856.00K | $4.31 Million | ▲ +234.2% |
| 2003 | -0.15x | $-768.00K | $5.19 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2002 | -0.19x | $-1.34 Million | $6.91 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2001 | -0.36x | $-2.36 Million | $6.58 Million | ▼ -289.9% |
| 2000 | -0.09x | $-727.00K | $7.90 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 1999 | -0.45x | $-3.40 Million | $7.50 Million | ▼ -651.6% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $600.00K | $7.30 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $1.60 Million | $6.20 Million | ▲ +183.9% |
| 1996 | -0.31x | $-3.20 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 1995 | -0.78x | $-2.90 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +15.1% |
| 1994 | -0.92x | $-1.20 Million | $1.30 Million | — |