Hudson Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hudson Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Hudson Technologies Inc (HDSN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.85 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($78.80 Million) in one year. Check HDSN cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Hudson Technologies Inc (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Hudson Technologies Inc from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Hudson Technologies Inc across 32 annual periods. Check Hudson Technologies Inc (HDSN) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Hudson Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Hudson Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hudson Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see HDSN operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.04x | $-3.16 Million | $75.26 Million | ▼ -102.6% |
| 2024 | 1.62x | $91.81 Million | $56.80 Million | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2023 | 0.86x | $58.55 Million | $67.90 Million | ▲ +34.0% |
| 2022 | 0.64x | $62.81 Million | $97.62 Million | ▲ +7686.3% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-1.23 Million | $144.78 Million | ▼ -108.8% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $11.69 Million | $121.03 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | $33.82 Million | $135.04 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $36.33 Million | $159.13 Million | ▲ +146.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $18.37 Million | $197.99 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2016 | 0.89x | $9.35 Million | $10.45 Million | ▲ +403.0% |
| 2015 | -0.30x | $-10.50 Million | $35.59 Million | ▼ -376.5% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $1.70 Million | $15.94 Million | ▲ +140.4% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-6.42 Million | $24.28 Million | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | $-9.27 Million | $24.54 Million | ▼ -864.7% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $613.00K | $12.41 Million | ▼ -79.4% |
| 2010 | 0.24x | $3.13 Million | $13.07 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $3.36 Million | $14.33 Million | ▲ +211.1% |
| 2008 | -0.21x | $-4.39 Million | $20.79 Million | ▼ -864.0% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $382.00K | $13.82 Million | ▲ +122.2% |
| 2006 | -0.12x | $-1.21 Million | $9.71 Million | ▼ -815.9% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $106.00K | $6.11 Million | ▼ -91.3% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $856.00K | $4.31 Million | ▲ +234.2% |
| 2003 | -0.15x | $-768.00K | $5.19 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2002 | -0.19x | $-1.34 Million | $6.91 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2001 | -0.36x | $-2.36 Million | $6.58 Million | ▼ -289.9% |
| 2000 | -0.09x | $-727.00K | $7.90 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 1999 | -0.45x | $-3.40 Million | $7.50 Million | ▼ -651.6% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $600.00K | $7.30 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $1.60 Million | $6.20 Million | ▲ +183.9% |
| 1996 | -0.31x | $-3.20 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 1995 | -0.78x | $-2.90 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +15.1% |
| 1994 | -0.92x | $-1.20 Million | $1.30 Million | — |