Hudson Technologies Inc (HDSN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hudson Technologies Inc (HDSN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.85 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($78.80 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Hudson Technologies Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hudson Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hudson Technologies Inc across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Hudson Technologies Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hudson Technologies Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hudson Technologies Inc. Check Hudson Technologies Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.04x | $-3.16 Million | $75.26 Million | ▼ -102.6% |
| 2024 | 1.62x | $91.81 Million | $56.80 Million | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2023 | 0.86x | $58.55 Million | $67.90 Million | ▲ +34.0% |
| 2022 | 0.64x | $62.81 Million | $97.62 Million | ▲ +7686.3% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-1.23 Million | $144.78 Million | ▼ -108.8% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $11.69 Million | $121.03 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | $33.82 Million | $135.04 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $36.33 Million | $159.13 Million | ▲ +146.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $18.37 Million | $197.99 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2016 | 0.89x | $9.35 Million | $10.45 Million | ▲ +403.0% |
| 2015 | -0.30x | $-10.50 Million | $35.59 Million | ▼ -376.5% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $1.70 Million | $15.94 Million | ▲ +140.4% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-6.42 Million | $24.28 Million | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | $-9.27 Million | $24.54 Million | ▼ -864.7% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $613.00K | $12.41 Million | ▼ -79.4% |
| 2010 | 0.24x | $3.13 Million | $13.07 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $3.36 Million | $14.33 Million | ▲ +211.1% |
| 2008 | -0.21x | $-4.39 Million | $20.79 Million | ▼ -864.0% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $382.00K | $13.82 Million | ▲ +122.2% |
| 2006 | -0.12x | $-1.21 Million | $9.71 Million | ▼ -815.9% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $106.00K | $6.11 Million | ▼ -91.3% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $856.00K | $4.31 Million | ▲ +234.2% |
| 2003 | -0.15x | $-768.00K | $5.19 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2002 | -0.19x | $-1.34 Million | $6.91 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2001 | -0.36x | $-2.36 Million | $6.58 Million | ▼ -289.9% |
| 2000 | -0.09x | $-727.00K | $7.90 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 1999 | -0.45x | $-3.40 Million | $7.50 Million | ▼ -651.6% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $600.00K | $7.30 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $1.60 Million | $6.20 Million | ▲ +183.9% |
| 1996 | -0.31x | $-3.20 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 1995 | -0.78x | $-2.90 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +15.1% |
| 1994 | -0.92x | $-1.20 Million | $1.30 Million | — |