Hudson Technologies Inc (HDSN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hudson Technologies Inc (HDSN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.18x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-12.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($71.25 Million) in one year. See HDSN FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hudson Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hudson Technologies Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore HDSN net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hudson Technologies Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hudson Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see HDSN stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.04x | $-3.16 Million | $75.26 Million | ▼ -102.6% |
| 2024 | 1.62x | $91.81 Million | $56.80 Million | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2023 | 0.86x | $58.55 Million | $67.90 Million | ▲ +34.0% |
| 2022 | 0.64x | $62.81 Million | $97.62 Million | ▲ +7686.3% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-1.23 Million | $144.78 Million | ▼ -108.8% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $11.69 Million | $121.03 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | $33.82 Million | $135.04 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $36.33 Million | $159.13 Million | ▲ +146.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $18.37 Million | $197.99 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2016 | 0.89x | $9.35 Million | $10.45 Million | ▲ +403.0% |
| 2015 | -0.30x | $-10.50 Million | $35.59 Million | ▼ -376.5% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $1.70 Million | $15.94 Million | ▲ +140.4% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-6.42 Million | $24.28 Million | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | $-9.27 Million | $24.54 Million | ▼ -864.7% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $613.00K | $12.41 Million | ▼ -79.4% |
| 2010 | 0.24x | $3.13 Million | $13.07 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $3.36 Million | $14.33 Million | ▲ +211.1% |
| 2008 | -0.21x | $-4.39 Million | $20.79 Million | ▼ -864.0% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $382.00K | $13.82 Million | ▲ +122.2% |
| 2006 | -0.12x | $-1.21 Million | $9.71 Million | ▼ -815.9% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $106.00K | $6.11 Million | ▼ -91.3% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $856.00K | $4.31 Million | ▲ +234.2% |
| 2003 | -0.15x | $-768.00K | $5.19 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2002 | -0.19x | $-1.34 Million | $6.91 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2001 | -0.36x | $-2.36 Million | $6.58 Million | ▼ -289.9% |
| 2000 | -0.09x | $-727.00K | $7.90 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 1999 | -0.45x | $-3.40 Million | $7.50 Million | ▼ -651.6% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $600.00K | $7.30 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $1.60 Million | $6.20 Million | ▲ +183.9% |
| 1996 | -0.31x | $-3.20 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 1995 | -0.78x | $-2.90 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +15.1% |
| 1994 | -0.92x | $-1.20 Million | $1.30 Million | — |