Hub Group Inc (HUBG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hub Group Inc (HUBG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $28.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.15 Billion) in one year. Explore HUBG long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hub Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hub Group Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore Hub Group Inc balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hub Group Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hub Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Hub Group Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.17x | $194.42 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -49.1% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $422.16 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2022 | 0.35x | $458.16 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $252.84 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $174.95 Million | $947.47 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | $254.51 Million | $916.29 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $210.84 Million | $944.06 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $125.22 Million | $901.07 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $102.47 Million | $732.08 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $171.70 Million | $653.31 Million | ▲ +63.0% |
| 2014 | 0.16x | $98.54 Million | $611.34 Million | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $117.42 Million | $486.42 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $92.92 Million | $418.96 Million | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $74.87 Million | $403.82 Million | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $37.65 Million | $253.11 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $45.23 Million | $219.51 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | $61.51 Million | $216.49 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $80.58 Million | $241.07 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $76.59 Million | $225.70 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | $51.62 Million | $202.34 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | $35.85 Million | $183.91 Million | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $31.50 Million | $246.53 Million | ▲ +169.4% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $12.56 Million | $264.92 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $27.63 Million | $283.57 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $41.35 Million | $331.12 Million | ▲ +227.8% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $11.80 Million | $309.73 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $28.69 Million | $179.15 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $39.45 Million | $150.58 Million | ▲ +95.7% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $19.33 Million | $144.39 Million | — |