Hub Group Inc (HUBG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hub Group Inc (HUBG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $28.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.15 Billion) in one year. See Hub Group Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hub Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hub Group Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore Hub Group Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hub Group Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hub Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see HUBG market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.17x | $194.42 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -49.1% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $422.16 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2022 | 0.35x | $458.16 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $252.84 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $174.95 Million | $947.47 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | $254.51 Million | $916.29 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $210.84 Million | $944.06 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $125.22 Million | $901.07 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $102.47 Million | $732.08 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $171.70 Million | $653.31 Million | ▲ +63.0% |
| 2014 | 0.16x | $98.54 Million | $611.34 Million | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $117.42 Million | $486.42 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $92.92 Million | $418.96 Million | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $74.87 Million | $403.82 Million | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $37.65 Million | $253.11 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $45.23 Million | $219.51 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | $61.51 Million | $216.49 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $80.58 Million | $241.07 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $76.59 Million | $225.70 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | $51.62 Million | $202.34 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | $35.85 Million | $183.91 Million | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $31.50 Million | $246.53 Million | ▲ +169.4% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $12.56 Million | $264.92 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $27.63 Million | $283.57 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $41.35 Million | $331.12 Million | ▲ +227.8% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $11.80 Million | $309.73 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $28.69 Million | $179.15 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $39.45 Million | $150.58 Million | ▲ +95.7% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $19.33 Million | $144.39 Million | — |