Hub Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hub Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Hub Group Inc (HUBG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $28.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.15 Billion) in one year. Check HUBG cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Hub Group Inc (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Hub Group Inc from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Hub Group Inc across 29 annual periods. Check HUBG cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Hub Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Hub Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hub Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Hub Group Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.17x | $194.42 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -49.1% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $422.16 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2022 | 0.35x | $458.16 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $252.84 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $174.95 Million | $947.47 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | $254.51 Million | $916.29 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $210.84 Million | $944.06 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $125.22 Million | $901.07 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $102.47 Million | $732.08 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $171.70 Million | $653.31 Million | ▲ +63.0% |
| 2014 | 0.16x | $98.54 Million | $611.34 Million | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $117.42 Million | $486.42 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $92.92 Million | $418.96 Million | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $74.87 Million | $403.82 Million | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $37.65 Million | $253.11 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $45.23 Million | $219.51 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | $61.51 Million | $216.49 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $80.58 Million | $241.07 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $76.59 Million | $225.70 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | $51.62 Million | $202.34 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | $35.85 Million | $183.91 Million | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $31.50 Million | $246.53 Million | ▲ +169.4% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $12.56 Million | $264.92 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $27.63 Million | $283.57 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $41.35 Million | $331.12 Million | ▲ +227.8% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $11.80 Million | $309.73 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $28.69 Million | $179.15 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $39.45 Million | $150.58 Million | ▲ +95.7% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $19.33 Million | $144.39 Million | — |