Intellicheck Mobilisa Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Intellicheck Mobilisa Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Intellicheck Mobilisa Inc (IDN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.58x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.80 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($3.08 Million) in one year. Check IDN cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Intellicheck Mobilisa Inc (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Intellicheck Mobilisa Inc from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Intellicheck Mobilisa Inc across 28 annual periods. Check IDN total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Intellicheck Mobilisa Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Intellicheck Mobilisa Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Intellicheck Mobilisa Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Intellicheck Mobilisa Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.20x | $4.54 Million | $3.78 Million | ▲ +241.9% |
| 2024 | -0.85x | $-2.69 Million | $3.19 Million | ▼ -753.7% |
| 2023 | -0.10x | $-647.00K | $6.53 Million | ▲ +88.8% |
| 2022 | -0.88x | $-3.48 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -584.4% |
| 2021 | 0.18x | $1.12 Million | $6.13 Million | ▲ +2137.2% |
| 2020 | -0.01x | $-19.02K | $2.13 Million | ▲ +98.9% |
| 2019 | -0.82x | $-1.84 Million | $2.25 Million | ▲ +70.1% |
| 2018 | -2.74x | $-4.22 Million | $1.54 Million | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2017 | -2.00x | $-3.75 Million | $1.87 Million | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2016 | -2.65x | $-4.24 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2015 | -2.07x | $-4.44 Million | $2.15 Million | ▼ -132.1% |
| 2014 | -0.89x | $-2.37 Million | $2.67 Million | ▼ -56.2% |
| 2013 | -0.57x | $-1.45 Million | $2.55 Million | ▼ -558.9% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $345.58K | $2.78 Million | ▲ +651.3% |
| 2011 | -0.02x | $-71.86K | $3.19 Million | ▲ +91.8% |
| 2010 | -0.27x | $-1.15 Million | $4.19 Million | ▼ -458.9% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $319.81K | $4.18 Million | ▼ -66.2% |
| 2008 | 0.23x | $805.12K | $3.55 Million | ▲ +120.8% |
| 2007 | -1.09x | $-2.24 Million | $2.05 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2006 | -1.17x | $-2.01 Million | $1.72 Million | ▲ +43.6% |
| 2005 | -2.07x | $-3.14 Million | $1.52 Million | ▼ -112.9% |
| 2004 | -0.97x | $-4.61 Million | $4.75 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2003 | -1.20x | $-4.61 Million | $3.83 Million | ▲ +50.8% |
| 2002 | -2.45x | $-3.77 Million | $1.54 Million | ▼ -14.9% |
| 2001 | -2.13x | $-2.97 Million | $1.39 Million | ▲ +49.0% |
| 2000 | -4.17x | $-5.45 Million | $1.31 Million | ▼ -150.4% |
| 1999 | -1.67x | $-1.50 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -100.0% |
| 1998 | -0.83x | $-1.00 Million | $1.20 Million | — |