Innodata Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Innodata Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Innodata Inc (INOD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.83x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $164.44 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($197.14 Million) in one year. Check Innodata Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Innodata Inc (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Innodata Inc from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Innodata Inc across 33 annual periods. Check INOD cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Innodata Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Innodata Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Innodata Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Innodata Inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.76x | $46.75 Million | $61.53 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2024 | 0.70x | $35.02 Million | $50.06 Million | ▲ +308.0% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $5.90 Million | $34.44 Million | ▲ +522.9% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | $-1.22 Million | $30.00 Million | ▼ -125.8% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $5.15 Million | $32.81 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $5.66 Million | $31.00 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | $4.28 Million | $27.38 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $3.60 Million | $18.93 Million | ▲ +433.9% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $738.00K | $20.69 Million | ▲ +122.7% |
| 2016 | -0.16x | $-2.73 Million | $17.44 Million | ▼ -197.5% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $2.66 Million | $16.53 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2014 | 0.25x | $4.61 Million | $18.59 Million | ▲ +446.4% |
| 2013 | 0.05x | $621.00K | $13.67 Million | ▼ -95.6% |
| 2012 | 1.03x | $17.77 Million | $17.27 Million | ▲ +748.6% |
| 2011 | -0.16x | $-2.98 Million | $18.79 Million | ▼ -141.8% |
| 2010 | 0.38x | $4.86 Million | $12.81 Million | ▼ -60.6% |
| 2009 | 0.96x | $12.10 Million | $12.58 Million | ▲ +224.4% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $4.50 Million | $15.20 Million | ▼ -24.8% |
| 2007 | 0.39x | $6.00 Million | $15.22 Million | ▲ +229.1% |
| 2006 | -0.31x | $-3.45 Million | $11.32 Million | ▼ -390.0% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $1.14 Million | $10.80 Million | ▼ -93.0% |
| 2004 | 1.50x | $15.67 Million | $10.47 Million | ▲ +1598.2% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $682.00K | $7.74 Million | ▼ -79.4% |
| 2002 | 0.43x | $3.05 Million | $7.13 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2001 | 0.50x | $4.84 Million | $9.73 Million | ▼ -65.4% |
| 2000 | 1.44x | $12.39 Million | $8.63 Million | ▲ +93.0% |
| 1999 | 0.74x | $2.90 Million | $3.90 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1998 | 0.81x | $2.50 Million | $3.10 Million | ▲ +244.6% |
| 1997 | 0.23x | $1.10 Million | $4.70 Million | ▼ -24.6% |
| 1996 | 0.31x | $900.00K | $2.90 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 1995 | 0.25x | $700.00K | $2.80 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 1994 | 0.50x | $900.00K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +283.3% |
| 1993 | -0.27x | $-300.00K | $1.10 Million | — |