IRIDEX Corporation (IRIX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
IRIDEX Corporation (IRIX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $589.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($24.23 Million) in one year. See IRIDEX Corporation free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
IRIDEX Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for IRIDEX Corporation across 31 annual periods. Also explore IRIX shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for IRIDEX Corporation (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for IRIDEX Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see IRIX company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.09x | $-2.12 Million | $24.23 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2024 | -0.27x | $-7.29 Million | $27.04 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2023 | -0.27x | $-6.75 Million | $24.91 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 2022 | -0.38x | $-9.52 Million | $25.06 Million | ▼ -217.4% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $8.22 Million | $25.39 Million | ▲ +206.0% |
| 2020 | -0.31x | $-3.24 Million | $10.60 Million | ▲ +53.3% |
| 2019 | -0.65x | $-7.91 Million | $12.11 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2018 | -0.86x | $-10.03 Million | $11.71 Million | ▼ -167.1% |
| 2017 | -0.32x | $-3.56 Million | $11.12 Million | ▼ -1899.4% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | $-144.00K | $8.98 Million | ▲ +78.0% |
| 2015 | -0.07x | $-593.00K | $8.13 Million | ▼ -114.7% |
| 2014 | 0.50x | $4.01 Million | $8.08 Million | ▲ +406.6% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $767.00K | $7.82 Million | ▲ +255.1% |
| 2012 | -0.06x | $-443.00K | $7.01 Million | ▼ -120.2% |
| 2011 | 0.31x | $3.05 Million | $9.72 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $3.48 Million | $9.79 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $6.80 Million | $13.27 Million | ▲ +8897.0% |
| 2008 | -0.01x | $-96.00K | $16.48 Million | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | $-522.00K | $27.84 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2006 | -0.17x | $-1.39 Million | $8.02 Million | ▼ -141.1% |
| 2005 | 0.42x | $2.77 Million | $6.59 Million | ▲ +298.7% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $771.00K | $7.31 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2003 | 1.02x | $5.10 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +64.9% |
| 2002 | 0.62x | $2.52 Million | $4.07 Million | ▲ +167.3% |
| 2001 | -0.92x | $-3.63 Million | $3.96 Million | ▼ -5520.1% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-74.00K | $4.53 Million | ▼ -102.9% |
| 1999 | 0.55x | $2.86 Million | $5.16 Million | ▲ +169.3% |
| 1998 | -0.80x | $-2.00 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -2140.0% |
| 1997 | -0.04x | $-100.00K | $2.80 Million | ▲ +94.0% |
| 1996 | -0.59x | $-1.30 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -211.6% |
| 1995 | 0.53x | $900.00K | $1.70 Million | — |