IRIDEX Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
IRIDEX Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. IRIDEX Corporation (IRIX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $174.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($23.62 Million) in one year. Check IRIX operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of IRIDEX Corporation (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of IRIDEX Corporation from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for IRIDEX Corporation across 31 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of IRIDEX Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
IRIDEX Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
IRIDEX Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for IRIDEX Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of IRIDEX Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.09x | $-2.12 Million | $24.23 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2024 | -0.27x | $-7.29 Million | $27.04 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2023 | -0.27x | $-6.75 Million | $24.91 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 2022 | -0.38x | $-9.52 Million | $25.06 Million | ▼ -217.4% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $8.22 Million | $25.39 Million | ▲ +206.0% |
| 2020 | -0.31x | $-3.24 Million | $10.60 Million | ▲ +53.3% |
| 2019 | -0.65x | $-7.91 Million | $12.11 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2018 | -0.86x | $-10.03 Million | $11.71 Million | ▼ -167.1% |
| 2017 | -0.32x | $-3.56 Million | $11.12 Million | ▼ -1899.4% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | $-144.00K | $8.98 Million | ▲ +78.0% |
| 2015 | -0.07x | $-593.00K | $8.13 Million | ▼ -114.7% |
| 2014 | 0.50x | $4.01 Million | $8.08 Million | ▲ +406.6% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $767.00K | $7.82 Million | ▲ +255.1% |
| 2012 | -0.06x | $-443.00K | $7.01 Million | ▼ -120.2% |
| 2011 | 0.31x | $3.05 Million | $9.72 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $3.48 Million | $9.79 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $6.80 Million | $13.27 Million | ▲ +8897.0% |
| 2008 | -0.01x | $-96.00K | $16.48 Million | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | $-522.00K | $27.84 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2006 | -0.17x | $-1.39 Million | $8.02 Million | ▼ -141.1% |
| 2005 | 0.42x | $2.77 Million | $6.59 Million | ▲ +298.7% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $771.00K | $7.31 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2003 | 1.02x | $5.10 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +64.9% |
| 2002 | 0.62x | $2.52 Million | $4.07 Million | ▲ +167.3% |
| 2001 | -0.92x | $-3.63 Million | $3.96 Million | ▼ -5520.1% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-74.00K | $4.53 Million | ▼ -102.9% |
| 1999 | 0.55x | $2.86 Million | $5.16 Million | ▲ +169.3% |
| 1998 | -0.80x | $-2.00 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -2140.0% |
| 1997 | -0.04x | $-100.00K | $2.80 Million | ▲ +94.0% |
| 1996 | -0.59x | $-1.30 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -211.6% |
| 1995 | 0.53x | $900.00K | $1.70 Million | — |