IRIDEX Corporation (IRIX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
IRIDEX Corporation (IRIX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $589.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($24.23 Million) in one year. Check IRIX capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
IRIDEX Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for IRIDEX Corporation across 31 annual periods. Also explore IRIDEX Corporation balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for IRIDEX Corporation (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for IRIDEX Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see IRIX company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.09x | $-2.12 Million | $24.23 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2024 | -0.27x | $-7.29 Million | $27.04 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2023 | -0.27x | $-6.75 Million | $24.91 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 2022 | -0.38x | $-9.52 Million | $25.06 Million | ▼ -217.4% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $8.22 Million | $25.39 Million | ▲ +206.0% |
| 2020 | -0.31x | $-3.24 Million | $10.60 Million | ▲ +53.3% |
| 2019 | -0.65x | $-7.91 Million | $12.11 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2018 | -0.86x | $-10.03 Million | $11.71 Million | ▼ -167.1% |
| 2017 | -0.32x | $-3.56 Million | $11.12 Million | ▼ -1899.4% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | $-144.00K | $8.98 Million | ▲ +78.0% |
| 2015 | -0.07x | $-593.00K | $8.13 Million | ▼ -114.7% |
| 2014 | 0.50x | $4.01 Million | $8.08 Million | ▲ +406.6% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $767.00K | $7.82 Million | ▲ +255.1% |
| 2012 | -0.06x | $-443.00K | $7.01 Million | ▼ -120.2% |
| 2011 | 0.31x | $3.05 Million | $9.72 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $3.48 Million | $9.79 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $6.80 Million | $13.27 Million | ▲ +8897.0% |
| 2008 | -0.01x | $-96.00K | $16.48 Million | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | $-522.00K | $27.84 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2006 | -0.17x | $-1.39 Million | $8.02 Million | ▼ -141.1% |
| 2005 | 0.42x | $2.77 Million | $6.59 Million | ▲ +298.7% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $771.00K | $7.31 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2003 | 1.02x | $5.10 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +64.9% |
| 2002 | 0.62x | $2.52 Million | $4.07 Million | ▲ +167.3% |
| 2001 | -0.92x | $-3.63 Million | $3.96 Million | ▼ -5520.1% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-74.00K | $4.53 Million | ▼ -102.9% |
| 1999 | 0.55x | $2.86 Million | $5.16 Million | ▲ +169.3% |
| 1998 | -0.80x | $-2.00 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -2140.0% |
| 1997 | -0.04x | $-100.00K | $2.80 Million | ▲ +94.0% |
| 1996 | -0.59x | $-1.30 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -211.6% |
| 1995 | 0.53x | $900.00K | $1.70 Million | — |