KLA Corporation (KLAC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $707.45 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.04 Billion) in one year. See financial flexibility index of KLA Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
KLA Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for KLA Corporation across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KLA Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for KLA Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for KLA Corporation. Check earnings quality score of KLA Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.36x | $4.08 Billion | $11.38 Billion | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $3.31 Billion | $12.07 Billion | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2023 | 0.33x | $3.67 Billion | $11.15 Billion | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2022 | 0.30x | $3.31 Billion | $11.20 Billion | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $2.19 Billion | $6.90 Billion | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | $1.78 Billion | $6.60 Billion | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $1.15 Billion | $6.33 Billion | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2018 | 0.31x | $1.23 Billion | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $1.08 Billion | $4.21 Billion | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $759.70 Million | $4.27 Billion | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $605.91 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2014 | 0.42x | $778.89 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2013 | 0.51x | $913.19 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2012 | 0.53x | $941.62 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2011 | 0.45x | $823.17 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▲ +68.2% |
| 2010 | 0.27x | $447.80 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $195.68 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $668.17 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2007 | 0.57x | $610.69 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $315.17 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2005 | 0.54x | $506.74 Million | $931.86 Million | ▲ +41.8% |
| 2004 | 0.38x | $349.68 Million | $911.63 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2003 | 0.38x | $246.26 Million | $651.06 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2002 | 0.39x | $270.18 Million | $687.49 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2001 | 0.41x | $407.92 Million | $984.09 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2000 | 0.51x | $252.52 Million | $494.83 Million | ▲ +47.0% |
| 1999 | 0.35x | $122.30 Million | $352.30 Million | ▲ +64.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $74.20 Million | $350.70 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 1997 | 0.75x | $246.00 Million | $328.70 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 1996 | 0.63x | $111.30 Million | $175.60 Million | ▲ +304.5% |
| 1995 | 0.16x | $22.30 Million | $142.30 Million | ▲ +30.6% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $11.30 Million | $94.20 Million | ▼ -66.3% |
| 1993 | 0.36x | $30.30 Million | $85.00 Million | ▲ +792.7% |
| 1992 | -0.05x | $-4.40 Million | $85.50 Million | ▼ -142.4% |
| 1991 | -0.02x | $-1.80 Million | $84.80 Million | ▼ -104.4% |
| 1990 | 0.49x | $27.90 Million | $57.20 Million | — |