KLA Corporation (KLAC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $707.45 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.04 Billion) in one year. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of KLA Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
KLA Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for KLA Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore KLAC total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for KLA Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for KLA Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of KLA Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.36x | $4.08 Billion | $11.38 Billion | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $3.31 Billion | $12.07 Billion | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2023 | 0.33x | $3.67 Billion | $11.15 Billion | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2022 | 0.30x | $3.31 Billion | $11.20 Billion | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $2.19 Billion | $6.90 Billion | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | $1.78 Billion | $6.60 Billion | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $1.15 Billion | $6.33 Billion | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2018 | 0.31x | $1.23 Billion | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $1.08 Billion | $4.21 Billion | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $759.70 Million | $4.27 Billion | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $605.91 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2014 | 0.42x | $778.89 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2013 | 0.51x | $913.19 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2012 | 0.53x | $941.62 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2011 | 0.45x | $823.17 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▲ +68.2% |
| 2010 | 0.27x | $447.80 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $195.68 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $668.17 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2007 | 0.57x | $610.69 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $315.17 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2005 | 0.54x | $506.74 Million | $931.86 Million | ▲ +41.8% |
| 2004 | 0.38x | $349.68 Million | $911.63 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2003 | 0.38x | $246.26 Million | $651.06 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2002 | 0.39x | $270.18 Million | $687.49 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2001 | 0.41x | $407.92 Million | $984.09 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2000 | 0.51x | $252.52 Million | $494.83 Million | ▲ +47.0% |
| 1999 | 0.35x | $122.30 Million | $352.30 Million | ▲ +64.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $74.20 Million | $350.70 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 1997 | 0.75x | $246.00 Million | $328.70 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 1996 | 0.63x | $111.30 Million | $175.60 Million | ▲ +304.5% |
| 1995 | 0.16x | $22.30 Million | $142.30 Million | ▲ +30.6% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $11.30 Million | $94.20 Million | ▼ -66.3% |
| 1993 | 0.36x | $30.30 Million | $85.00 Million | ▲ +792.7% |
| 1992 | -0.05x | $-4.40 Million | $85.50 Million | ▼ -142.4% |
| 1991 | -0.02x | $-1.80 Million | $84.80 Million | ▼ -104.4% |
| 1990 | 0.49x | $27.90 Million | $57.20 Million | — |