KLA Corporation (KLAC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $707.45 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.04 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does KLA Corporation generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
KLA Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for KLA Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore KLAC shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for KLA Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for KLA Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see KLAC stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.36x | $4.08 Billion | $11.38 Billion | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $3.31 Billion | $12.07 Billion | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2023 | 0.33x | $3.67 Billion | $11.15 Billion | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2022 | 0.30x | $3.31 Billion | $11.20 Billion | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $2.19 Billion | $6.90 Billion | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | $1.78 Billion | $6.60 Billion | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $1.15 Billion | $6.33 Billion | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2018 | 0.31x | $1.23 Billion | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $1.08 Billion | $4.21 Billion | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $759.70 Million | $4.27 Billion | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $605.91 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2014 | 0.42x | $778.89 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2013 | 0.51x | $913.19 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2012 | 0.53x | $941.62 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2011 | 0.45x | $823.17 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▲ +68.2% |
| 2010 | 0.27x | $447.80 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $195.68 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $668.17 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2007 | 0.57x | $610.69 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $315.17 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2005 | 0.54x | $506.74 Million | $931.86 Million | ▲ +41.8% |
| 2004 | 0.38x | $349.68 Million | $911.63 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2003 | 0.38x | $246.26 Million | $651.06 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2002 | 0.39x | $270.18 Million | $687.49 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2001 | 0.41x | $407.92 Million | $984.09 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2000 | 0.51x | $252.52 Million | $494.83 Million | ▲ +47.0% |
| 1999 | 0.35x | $122.30 Million | $352.30 Million | ▲ +64.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $74.20 Million | $350.70 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 1997 | 0.75x | $246.00 Million | $328.70 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 1996 | 0.63x | $111.30 Million | $175.60 Million | ▲ +304.5% |
| 1995 | 0.16x | $22.30 Million | $142.30 Million | ▲ +30.6% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $11.30 Million | $94.20 Million | ▼ -66.3% |
| 1993 | 0.36x | $30.30 Million | $85.00 Million | ▲ +792.7% |
| 1992 | -0.05x | $-4.40 Million | $85.50 Million | ▼ -142.4% |
| 1991 | -0.02x | $-1.80 Million | $84.80 Million | ▼ -104.4% |
| 1990 | 0.49x | $27.90 Million | $57.20 Million | — |