Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc (KLIC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc (KLIC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($328.44 Million) in one year. See Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore KLIC shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.40x | $113.56 Million | $282.85 Million | ▲ +283.1% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $31.04 Million | $296.15 Million | ▼ -80.3% |
| 2023 | 0.53x | $173.40 Million | $325.22 Million | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2022 | 0.99x | $390.19 Million | $393.95 Million | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2021 | 0.59x | $300.03 Million | $506.39 Million | ▲ +86.1% |
| 2020 | 0.32x | $94.41 Million | $296.57 Million | ▲ +49.9% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | $65.97 Million | $310.55 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2018 | 0.40x | $123.50 Million | $305.53 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2017 | 0.53x | $136.31 Million | $258.17 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2016 | 0.39x | $68.41 Million | $175.93 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2015 | 0.66x | $87.88 Million | $132.57 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2014 | 0.53x | $82.46 Million | $155.21 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2013 | 0.65x | $94.82 Million | $146.33 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2012 | 1.06x | $182.47 Million | $171.94 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2011 | 0.78x | $200.40 Million | $258.56 Million | ▲ +132.8% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | $85.80 Million | $257.69 Million | ▲ +261.5% |
| 2009 | -0.21x | $-53.52K | $259.62K | ▼ -389.9% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $28.06 Million | $394.67 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $31.76 Million | $429.35 Million | ▼ -61.9% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | $63.31 Million | $326.19 Million | ▲ +3122.1% |
| 2005 | -0.01x | $-2.69 Million | $418.24 Million | ▼ -103.8% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $71.26 Million | $420.66 Million | ▲ +357.7% |
| 2003 | -0.07x | $-29.10 Million | $442.76 Million | ▲ +57.2% |
| 2002 | -0.15x | $-72.00 Million | $469.36 Million | ▼ -193.7% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $71.87 Million | $438.84 Million | ▼ -61.7% |
| 2000 | 0.43x | $134.10 Million | $313.31 Million | ▲ +211.0% |
| 1999 | -0.39x | $-37.90 Million | $98.30 Million | ▼ -197.2% |
| 1998 | 0.40x | $21.70 Million | $54.70 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 1997 | 0.47x | $40.20 Million | $84.90 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 1996 | 0.38x | $38.90 Million | $102.10 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 1995 | 0.38x | $22.00 Million | $57.40 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $12.80 Million | $58.00 Million | ▲ +204.4% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $3.90 Million | $53.80 Million | ▲ +271.3% |
| 1992 | -0.04x | $-1.90 Million | $44.90 Million | ▼ -136.9% |
| 1991 | 0.11x | $4.90 Million | $42.70 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 1990 | 0.15x | $7.20 Million | $46.60 Million | ▲ +212.9% |
| 1989 | 0.05x | $2.40 Million | $48.60 Million | — |