Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc (KLIC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc (KLIC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $45.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($407.13 Million) in one year. See Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc (KLIC) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KLIC operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc. Check Kulicke and Soffa Industries Inc (KLIC) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.40x | $113.56 Million | $282.85 Million | ▲ +283.1% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $31.04 Million | $296.15 Million | ▼ -80.3% |
| 2023 | 0.53x | $173.40 Million | $325.22 Million | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2022 | 0.99x | $390.19 Million | $393.95 Million | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2021 | 0.59x | $300.03 Million | $506.39 Million | ▲ +86.1% |
| 2020 | 0.32x | $94.41 Million | $296.57 Million | ▲ +49.9% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | $65.97 Million | $310.55 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2018 | 0.40x | $123.50 Million | $305.53 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2017 | 0.53x | $136.31 Million | $258.17 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2016 | 0.39x | $68.41 Million | $175.93 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2015 | 0.66x | $87.88 Million | $132.57 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2014 | 0.53x | $82.46 Million | $155.21 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2013 | 0.65x | $94.82 Million | $146.33 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2012 | 1.06x | $182.47 Million | $171.94 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2011 | 0.78x | $200.40 Million | $258.56 Million | ▲ +132.8% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | $85.80 Million | $257.69 Million | ▲ +261.5% |
| 2009 | -0.21x | $-53.52K | $259.62K | ▼ -389.9% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $28.06 Million | $394.67 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $31.76 Million | $429.35 Million | ▼ -61.9% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | $63.31 Million | $326.19 Million | ▲ +3122.1% |
| 2005 | -0.01x | $-2.69 Million | $418.24 Million | ▼ -103.8% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $71.26 Million | $420.66 Million | ▲ +357.7% |
| 2003 | -0.07x | $-29.10 Million | $442.76 Million | ▲ +57.2% |
| 2002 | -0.15x | $-72.00 Million | $469.36 Million | ▼ -193.7% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $71.87 Million | $438.84 Million | ▼ -61.7% |
| 2000 | 0.43x | $134.10 Million | $313.31 Million | ▲ +211.0% |
| 1999 | -0.39x | $-37.90 Million | $98.30 Million | ▼ -197.2% |
| 1998 | 0.40x | $21.70 Million | $54.70 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 1997 | 0.47x | $40.20 Million | $84.90 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 1996 | 0.38x | $38.90 Million | $102.10 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 1995 | 0.38x | $22.00 Million | $57.40 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $12.80 Million | $58.00 Million | ▲ +204.4% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $3.90 Million | $53.80 Million | ▲ +271.3% |
| 1992 | -0.04x | $-1.90 Million | $44.90 Million | ▼ -136.9% |
| 1991 | 0.11x | $4.90 Million | $42.70 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 1990 | 0.15x | $7.20 Million | $46.60 Million | ▲ +212.9% |
| 1989 | 0.05x | $2.40 Million | $48.60 Million | — |