Laureate Education Inc (LAUR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Laureate Education Inc (LAUR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $140.98 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($997.04 Million) in one year. Explore LAUR strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Laureate Education Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Laureate Education Inc across 26 annual periods. Also explore Laureate Education Inc (LAUR) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Laureate Education Inc (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Laureate Education Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Laureate Education Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.26x | $232.73 Million | $903.52 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $250.78 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +43.1% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $178.20 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +202.3% |
| 2021 | -0.15x | $-155.80 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -251.8% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $259.56 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $330.68 Million | $3.68 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $396.90 Million | $4.70 Billion | ▲ +273.6% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $130.76 Million | $5.79 Billion | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $184.60 Million | $6.41 Billion | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $170.49 Million | $7.03 Billion | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $269.16 Million | $7.34 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $277.55 Million | $6.90 Billion | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2006 | 0.21x | $216.82 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | $141.06 Million | $731.55 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $124.34 Million | $614.54 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $58.90 Million | $434.77 Million | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | $81.12 Million | $405.33 Million | ▲ +235.5% |
| 2001 | -0.15x | $-45.40 Million | $307.40 Million | ▼ -902.6% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $7.93 Million | $430.82 Million | ▼ -92.2% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $70.92 Million | $301.95 Million | ▼ -30.9% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $58.13 Million | $170.96 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 1997 | 0.42x | $55.54 Million | $133.14 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 1996 | 0.33x | $23.29 Million | $70.99 Million | ▲ +417.2% |
| 1995 | -0.10x | $-3.00 Million | $29.00 Million | ▲ +35.9% |
| 1994 | -0.16x | $-1.50 Million | $9.30 Million | ▲ +39.5% |
| 1993 | -0.27x | $-1.60 Million | $6.00 Million | — |