Laureate Education Inc (LAUR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Laureate Education Inc (LAUR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $101.28 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.28 Billion) in one year. See LAUR FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Laureate Education Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Laureate Education Inc across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LAUR cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Laureate Education Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Laureate Education Inc. Check how high is Laureate Education Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.36x | $366.19 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2024 | 0.26x | $232.73 Million | $903.52 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $250.78 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +43.1% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $178.20 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +202.3% |
| 2021 | -0.15x | $-155.80 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -251.8% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $259.56 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $330.68 Million | $3.68 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $396.90 Million | $4.70 Billion | ▲ +273.6% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $130.76 Million | $5.79 Billion | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $184.60 Million | $6.41 Billion | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $170.49 Million | $7.03 Billion | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $269.16 Million | $7.34 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $277.55 Million | $6.90 Billion | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2006 | 0.21x | $216.82 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | $141.06 Million | $731.55 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $124.34 Million | $614.54 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $58.90 Million | $434.77 Million | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | $81.12 Million | $405.33 Million | ▲ +235.5% |
| 2001 | -0.15x | $-45.40 Million | $307.40 Million | ▼ -902.6% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $7.93 Million | $430.82 Million | ▼ -92.2% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $70.92 Million | $301.95 Million | ▼ -30.9% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $58.13 Million | $170.96 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 1997 | 0.42x | $55.54 Million | $133.14 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 1996 | 0.33x | $23.29 Million | $70.99 Million | ▲ +417.2% |
| 1995 | -0.10x | $-3.00 Million | $29.00 Million | ▲ +35.9% |
| 1994 | -0.16x | $-1.50 Million | $9.30 Million | ▲ +39.5% |
| 1993 | -0.27x | $-1.60 Million | $6.00 Million | — |