Laureate Education Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Laureate Education Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Laureate Education Inc (LAUR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $101.28 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.28 Billion) in one year. Check Laureate Education Inc (LAUR) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Laureate Education Inc (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Laureate Education Inc from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Laureate Education Inc across 27 annual periods. Check LAUR cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Laureate Education Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Laureate Education Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Laureate Education Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LAUR cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.36x | $366.19 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2024 | 0.26x | $232.73 Million | $903.52 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $250.78 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +43.1% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $178.20 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +202.3% |
| 2021 | -0.15x | $-155.80 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -251.8% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $259.56 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $330.68 Million | $3.68 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $396.90 Million | $4.70 Billion | ▲ +273.6% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $130.76 Million | $5.79 Billion | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $184.60 Million | $6.41 Billion | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $170.49 Million | $7.03 Billion | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $269.16 Million | $7.34 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $277.55 Million | $6.90 Billion | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2006 | 0.21x | $216.82 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | $141.06 Million | $731.55 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $124.34 Million | $614.54 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $58.90 Million | $434.77 Million | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | $81.12 Million | $405.33 Million | ▲ +235.5% |
| 2001 | -0.15x | $-45.40 Million | $307.40 Million | ▼ -902.6% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $7.93 Million | $430.82 Million | ▼ -92.2% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $70.92 Million | $301.95 Million | ▼ -30.9% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $58.13 Million | $170.96 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 1997 | 0.42x | $55.54 Million | $133.14 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 1996 | 0.33x | $23.29 Million | $70.99 Million | ▲ +417.2% |
| 1995 | -0.10x | $-3.00 Million | $29.00 Million | ▲ +35.9% |
| 1994 | -0.16x | $-1.50 Million | $9.30 Million | ▲ +39.5% |
| 1993 | -0.27x | $-1.60 Million | $6.00 Million | — |