Lifetime Brands Inc (LCUT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lifetime Brands Inc (LCUT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-22.19 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($396.48 Million) in one year. See Lifetime Brands Inc (LCUT) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lifetime Brands Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lifetime Brands Inc across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lifetime Brands Inc (LCUT) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lifetime Brands Inc (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lifetime Brands Inc. Check LCUT cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.05x | $18.57 Million | $404.39 Million | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $56.43 Million | $436.26 Million | ▲ +158.4% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $24.32 Million | $485.80 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $36.99 Million | $573.43 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $44.81 Million | $577.35 Million | ▲ +38.7% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $29.87 Million | $533.71 Million | ▲ +25.2% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $19.18 Million | $429.08 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $17.01 Million | $191.24 Million | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | $29.75 Million | $202.13 Million | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | $46.81 Million | $199.48 Million | ▲ +1092.3% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $4.59 Million | $233.17 Million | ▼ -91.5% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $36.31 Million | $156.26 Million | ▲ +80.8% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $22.70 Million | $176.57 Million | ▲ +82.0% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $12.19 Million | $172.57 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $30.10 Million | $149.98 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $63.99 Million | $172.71 Million | ▲ +1248.4% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $6.91 Million | $251.41 Million | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $31.57 Million | $224.18 Million | ▲ +323.1% |
| 2006 | -0.06x | $-11.45 Million | $181.45 Million | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2005 | 0.35x | $28.75 Million | $82.16 Million | ▲ +400.8% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $4.43 Million | $63.40 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $5.68 Million | $50.66 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | $6.81 Million | $33.28 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $7.84 Million | $44.92 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2000 | 0.66x | $22.44 Million | $34.07 Million | ▲ +968.6% |
| 1999 | -0.08x | $-2.10 Million | $27.70 Million | ▼ -106.7% |
| 1998 | 1.14x | $15.90 Million | $14.00 Million | ▲ +93.6% |
| 1997 | 0.59x | $7.10 Million | $12.10 Million | ▼ -59.2% |
| 1996 | 1.44x | $19.00 Million | $13.20 Million | ▲ +725.2% |
| 1995 | -0.23x | $-3.20 Million | $13.90 Million | ▼ -270.7% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $1.20 Million | $8.90 Million | ▲ +131.5% |
| 1993 | -0.43x | $-3.60 Million | $8.40 Million | ▼ -156.9% |
| 1992 | 0.75x | $5.50 Million | $7.30 Million | ▲ +461.6% |
| 1991 | 0.13x | $1.10 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 1990 | 0.51x | $10.60 Million | $20.70 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 1989 | 0.44x | $10.60 Million | $24.00 Million | — |