Lifetime Brands Inc (LCUT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lifetime Brands Inc (LCUT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-22.19 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($396.48 Million) in one year. Explore LCUT strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lifetime Brands Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lifetime Brands Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore Lifetime Brands Inc total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lifetime Brands Inc (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lifetime Brands Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Lifetime Brands Inc (LCUT) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.05x | $18.57 Million | $404.39 Million | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $56.43 Million | $436.26 Million | ▲ +158.4% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $24.32 Million | $485.80 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $36.99 Million | $573.43 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $44.81 Million | $577.35 Million | ▲ +38.7% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $29.87 Million | $533.71 Million | ▲ +25.2% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $19.18 Million | $429.08 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $17.01 Million | $191.24 Million | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | $29.75 Million | $202.13 Million | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | $46.81 Million | $199.48 Million | ▲ +1092.3% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $4.59 Million | $233.17 Million | ▼ -91.5% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $36.31 Million | $156.26 Million | ▲ +80.8% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $22.70 Million | $176.57 Million | ▲ +82.0% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $12.19 Million | $172.57 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $30.10 Million | $149.98 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $63.99 Million | $172.71 Million | ▲ +1248.4% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $6.91 Million | $251.41 Million | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $31.57 Million | $224.18 Million | ▲ +323.1% |
| 2006 | -0.06x | $-11.45 Million | $181.45 Million | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2005 | 0.35x | $28.75 Million | $82.16 Million | ▲ +400.8% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $4.43 Million | $63.40 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $5.68 Million | $50.66 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | $6.81 Million | $33.28 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $7.84 Million | $44.92 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2000 | 0.66x | $22.44 Million | $34.07 Million | ▲ +968.6% |
| 1999 | -0.08x | $-2.10 Million | $27.70 Million | ▼ -106.7% |
| 1998 | 1.14x | $15.90 Million | $14.00 Million | ▲ +93.6% |
| 1997 | 0.59x | $7.10 Million | $12.10 Million | ▼ -59.2% |
| 1996 | 1.44x | $19.00 Million | $13.20 Million | ▲ +725.2% |
| 1995 | -0.23x | $-3.20 Million | $13.90 Million | ▼ -270.7% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $1.20 Million | $8.90 Million | ▲ +131.5% |
| 1993 | -0.43x | $-3.60 Million | $8.40 Million | ▼ -156.9% |
| 1992 | 0.75x | $5.50 Million | $7.30 Million | ▲ +461.6% |
| 1991 | 0.13x | $1.10 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 1990 | 0.51x | $10.60 Million | $20.70 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 1989 | 0.44x | $10.60 Million | $24.00 Million | — |