Lifetime Brands Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lifetime Brands Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lifetime Brands Inc (LCUT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-22.19 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($396.48 Million) in one year. Check Lifetime Brands Inc (LCUT) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lifetime Brands Inc (1989–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lifetime Brands Inc from 1989 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lifetime Brands Inc across 36 annual periods. Check LCUT total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Lifetime Brands Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2024)
Lifetime Brands Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lifetime Brands Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Lifetime Brands Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.05x | $18.57 Million | $404.39 Million | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $56.43 Million | $436.26 Million | ▲ +158.4% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $24.32 Million | $485.80 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $36.99 Million | $573.43 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $44.81 Million | $577.35 Million | ▲ +38.7% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $29.87 Million | $533.71 Million | ▲ +25.2% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $19.18 Million | $429.08 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $17.01 Million | $191.24 Million | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | $29.75 Million | $202.13 Million | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | $46.81 Million | $199.48 Million | ▲ +1092.3% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $4.59 Million | $233.17 Million | ▼ -91.5% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $36.31 Million | $156.26 Million | ▲ +80.8% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $22.70 Million | $176.57 Million | ▲ +82.0% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $12.19 Million | $172.57 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $30.10 Million | $149.98 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $63.99 Million | $172.71 Million | ▲ +1248.4% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $6.91 Million | $251.41 Million | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $31.57 Million | $224.18 Million | ▲ +323.1% |
| 2006 | -0.06x | $-11.45 Million | $181.45 Million | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2005 | 0.35x | $28.75 Million | $82.16 Million | ▲ +400.8% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $4.43 Million | $63.40 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $5.68 Million | $50.66 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | $6.81 Million | $33.28 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $7.84 Million | $44.92 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2000 | 0.66x | $22.44 Million | $34.07 Million | ▲ +968.6% |
| 1999 | -0.08x | $-2.10 Million | $27.70 Million | ▼ -106.7% |
| 1998 | 1.14x | $15.90 Million | $14.00 Million | ▲ +93.6% |
| 1997 | 0.59x | $7.10 Million | $12.10 Million | ▼ -59.2% |
| 1996 | 1.44x | $19.00 Million | $13.20 Million | ▲ +725.2% |
| 1995 | -0.23x | $-3.20 Million | $13.90 Million | ▼ -270.7% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $1.20 Million | $8.90 Million | ▲ +131.5% |
| 1993 | -0.43x | $-3.60 Million | $8.40 Million | ▼ -156.9% |
| 1992 | 0.75x | $5.50 Million | $7.30 Million | ▲ +461.6% |
| 1991 | 0.13x | $1.10 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 1990 | 0.51x | $10.60 Million | $20.70 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 1989 | 0.44x | $10.60 Million | $24.00 Million | — |