Lincoln Educational Services (LINC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lincoln Educational Services (LINC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $43.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($293.48 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Lincoln Educational Services to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lincoln Educational Services Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2003–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lincoln Educational Services across 23 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Lincoln Educational Services to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lincoln Educational Services (2003–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lincoln Educational Services. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LINC company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $59.19 Million | $293.48 Million | ▲ +77.8% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $29.31 Million | $258.29 Million | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $25.56 Million | $178.44 Million | ▲ +2282.1% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $882.00K | $146.69 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2021 | 0.18x | $27.45 Million | $153.90 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $23.48 Million | $142.14 Million | ▲ +2235.1% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $988.00K | $139.63 Million | ▲ +144.3% |
| 2018 | -0.02x | $-1.69 Million | $106.17 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | $-11.32 Million | $109.40 Million | ▼ -53.9% |
| 2016 | -0.07x | $-6.11 Million | $90.82 Million | ▼ -160.6% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $14.34 Million | $129.28 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $12.02 Million | $130.70 Million | ▲ +355.5% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $3.25 Million | $160.75 Million | ▼ -81.3% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $15.99 Million | $148.30 Million | ▼ -63.9% |
| 2011 | 0.30x | $36.84 Million | $123.23 Million | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2010 | 0.60x | $114.46 Million | $190.34 Million | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2009 | 0.43x | $73.17 Million | $169.73 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2008 | 0.58x | $54.18 Million | $93.09 Million | ▲ +209.6% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | $15.73 Million | $83.72 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $15.26 Million | $74.43 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 2005 | 0.49x | $38.97 Million | $78.80 Million | ▲ +94.0% |
| 2004 | 0.25x | $26.67 Million | $104.64 Million | ▲ +152.8% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $9.72 Million | $96.43 Million | — |