Interlink Electronics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Interlink Electronics Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Interlink Electronics Inc (LINK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.27x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $653.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.45 Million) in one year. Check Interlink Electronics Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Interlink Electronics Inc (1993–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Interlink Electronics Inc from 1993 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Interlink Electronics Inc across 32 annual periods. Check Interlink Electronics Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Interlink Electronics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2024)
Interlink Electronics Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Interlink Electronics Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Interlink Electronics Inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.14x | $-367.00K | $2.62 Million | ▼ -145.3% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | $-116.00K | $2.03 Million | ▲ +92.9% |
| 2022 | -0.81x | $-915.00K | $1.14 Million | ▼ -474.8% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | $231.00K | $1.07 Million | ▲ +551.9% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $39.00K | $1.18 Million | ▲ +1155.5% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $2.00K | $761.00K | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2018 | 2.52x | $1.58 Million | $627.00K | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2017 | 2.91x | $2.05 Million | $703.00K | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2016 | 2.16x | $1.89 Million | $873.00K | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2015 | 2.38x | $2.14 Million | $899.00K | ▲ +116.8% |
| 2014 | 1.10x | $1.01 Million | $918.00K | ▲ +269.2% |
| 2013 | -0.65x | $-533.00K | $822.00K | ▼ -352.8% |
| 2012 | -0.14x | $-124.00K | $866.00K | ▲ +89.0% |
| 2011 | -1.31x | $-1.24 Million | $950.00K | ▼ -2225.7% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $70.00K | $1.14 Million | ▲ +112.4% |
| 2009 | -0.50x | $-1.05 Million | $2.12 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2008 | -0.47x | $-3.72 Million | $7.92 Million | ▼ -165.6% |
| 2007 | -0.18x | $-2.40 Million | $13.55 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2006 | -1.33x | $-9.97 Million | $7.49 Million | ▼ -183.2% |
| 2005 | -0.47x | $-4.18 Million | $8.90 Million | ▼ -128.0% |
| 2004 | -0.21x | $-1.26 Million | $6.09 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2003 | -0.70x | $-3.53 Million | $5.07 Million | ▼ -971.3% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $451.00K | $5.63 Million | ▲ +104.8% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $245.00K | $6.27 Million | ▲ +527.0% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | $-85.00K | $9.29 Million | ▼ -102.1% |
| 1999 | 0.45x | $2.86 Million | $6.43 Million | ▲ +536.3% |
| 1998 | -0.10x | $-500.00K | $4.90 Million | ▲ +86.1% |
| 1997 | -0.73x | $-3.00 Million | $4.10 Million | ▼ -80.1% |
| 1996 | -0.41x | $-1.30 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +18.8% |
| 1995 | -0.50x | $-1.30 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +58.3% |
| 1994 | -1.20x | $-1.80 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 1993 | -3.00x | $-4.20 Million | $1.40 Million | — |