Interlink Electronics Inc (LINK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Interlink Electronics Inc (LINK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.27x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $653.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.45 Million) in one year. Check Interlink Electronics Inc (LINK) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Interlink Electronics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Interlink Electronics Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore Interlink Electronics Inc (LINK) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Interlink Electronics Inc (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Interlink Electronics Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Interlink Electronics Inc (LINK) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.14x | $-367.00K | $2.62 Million | ▼ -145.3% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | $-116.00K | $2.03 Million | ▲ +92.9% |
| 2022 | -0.81x | $-915.00K | $1.14 Million | ▼ -474.8% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | $231.00K | $1.07 Million | ▲ +551.9% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $39.00K | $1.18 Million | ▲ +1155.5% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $2.00K | $761.00K | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2018 | 2.52x | $1.58 Million | $627.00K | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2017 | 2.91x | $2.05 Million | $703.00K | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2016 | 2.16x | $1.89 Million | $873.00K | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2015 | 2.38x | $2.14 Million | $899.00K | ▲ +116.8% |
| 2014 | 1.10x | $1.01 Million | $918.00K | ▲ +269.2% |
| 2013 | -0.65x | $-533.00K | $822.00K | ▼ -352.8% |
| 2012 | -0.14x | $-124.00K | $866.00K | ▲ +89.0% |
| 2011 | -1.31x | $-1.24 Million | $950.00K | ▼ -2225.7% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $70.00K | $1.14 Million | ▲ +112.4% |
| 2009 | -0.50x | $-1.05 Million | $2.12 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2008 | -0.47x | $-3.72 Million | $7.92 Million | ▼ -165.6% |
| 2007 | -0.18x | $-2.40 Million | $13.55 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2006 | -1.33x | $-9.97 Million | $7.49 Million | ▼ -183.2% |
| 2005 | -0.47x | $-4.18 Million | $8.90 Million | ▼ -128.0% |
| 2004 | -0.21x | $-1.26 Million | $6.09 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2003 | -0.70x | $-3.53 Million | $5.07 Million | ▼ -971.3% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $451.00K | $5.63 Million | ▲ +104.8% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $245.00K | $6.27 Million | ▲ +527.0% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | $-85.00K | $9.29 Million | ▼ -102.1% |
| 1999 | 0.45x | $2.86 Million | $6.43 Million | ▲ +536.3% |
| 1998 | -0.10x | $-500.00K | $4.90 Million | ▲ +86.1% |
| 1997 | -0.73x | $-3.00 Million | $4.10 Million | ▼ -80.1% |
| 1996 | -0.41x | $-1.30 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +18.8% |
| 1995 | -0.50x | $-1.30 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +58.3% |
| 1994 | -1.20x | $-1.80 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 1993 | -3.00x | $-4.20 Million | $1.40 Million | — |