Interlink Electronics Inc (LINK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Interlink Electronics Inc (LINK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.27x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $653.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.45 Million) in one year. See LINK FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Interlink Electronics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Interlink Electronics Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore LINK year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Interlink Electronics Inc (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Interlink Electronics Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LINK market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.14x | $-367.00K | $2.62 Million | ▼ -145.3% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | $-116.00K | $2.03 Million | ▲ +92.9% |
| 2022 | -0.81x | $-915.00K | $1.14 Million | ▼ -474.8% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | $231.00K | $1.07 Million | ▲ +551.9% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $39.00K | $1.18 Million | ▲ +1155.5% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $2.00K | $761.00K | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2018 | 2.52x | $1.58 Million | $627.00K | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2017 | 2.91x | $2.05 Million | $703.00K | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2016 | 2.16x | $1.89 Million | $873.00K | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2015 | 2.38x | $2.14 Million | $899.00K | ▲ +116.8% |
| 2014 | 1.10x | $1.01 Million | $918.00K | ▲ +269.2% |
| 2013 | -0.65x | $-533.00K | $822.00K | ▼ -352.8% |
| 2012 | -0.14x | $-124.00K | $866.00K | ▲ +89.0% |
| 2011 | -1.31x | $-1.24 Million | $950.00K | ▼ -2225.7% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $70.00K | $1.14 Million | ▲ +112.4% |
| 2009 | -0.50x | $-1.05 Million | $2.12 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2008 | -0.47x | $-3.72 Million | $7.92 Million | ▼ -165.6% |
| 2007 | -0.18x | $-2.40 Million | $13.55 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2006 | -1.33x | $-9.97 Million | $7.49 Million | ▼ -183.2% |
| 2005 | -0.47x | $-4.18 Million | $8.90 Million | ▼ -128.0% |
| 2004 | -0.21x | $-1.26 Million | $6.09 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2003 | -0.70x | $-3.53 Million | $5.07 Million | ▼ -971.3% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $451.00K | $5.63 Million | ▲ +104.8% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $245.00K | $6.27 Million | ▲ +527.0% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | $-85.00K | $9.29 Million | ▼ -102.1% |
| 1999 | 0.45x | $2.86 Million | $6.43 Million | ▲ +536.3% |
| 1998 | -0.10x | $-500.00K | $4.90 Million | ▲ +86.1% |
| 1997 | -0.73x | $-3.00 Million | $4.10 Million | ▼ -80.1% |
| 1996 | -0.41x | $-1.30 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +18.8% |
| 1995 | -0.50x | $-1.30 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +58.3% |
| 1994 | -1.20x | $-1.80 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 1993 | -3.00x | $-4.20 Million | $1.40 Million | — |