Live Ventures Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Live Ventures Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Live Ventures Inc (LIVE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $9.85 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($293.93 Million) in one year. Check LIVE cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Live Ventures Inc (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Live Ventures Inc from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Live Ventures Inc across 27 annual periods. Check LIVE capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Live Ventures Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Live Ventures Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Live Ventures Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Live Ventures Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $28.67 Million | $291.10 Million | ▲ +59.9% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $20.61 Million | $334.66 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $26.00 Million | $321.68 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $14.58 Million | $181.47 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $29.19 Million | $136.66 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $28.79 Million | $153.59 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $19.05 Million | $88.32 Million | ▲ +86.2% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $11.82 Million | $102.08 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $7.87 Million | $95.01 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | $6.06 Million | $29.27 Million | ▲ +758.2% |
| 2015 | -0.03x | $-1.02 Million | $32.40 Million | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2014 | -0.99x | $-5.19 Million | $5.22 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 2013 | -2.19x | $-1.81 Million | $823.52K | ▼ -10894.8% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $28.98K | $1.43 Million | ▲ +101.0% |
| 2011 | -2.10x | $-4.32 Million | $2.06 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2010 | -2.96x | $-3.94 Million | $1.33 Million | ▼ -82.4% |
| 2009 | -1.62x | $-2.96 Million | $1.83 Million | ▼ -501.2% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $1.33 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2007 | 0.76x | $1.77 Million | $2.33 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2006 | 0.56x | $2.42 Million | $4.35 Million | ▼ -87.5% |
| 2005 | 4.46x | $6.99 Million | $1.57 Million | ▲ +337.7% |
| 2004 | 1.02x | $4.76 Million | $4.67 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2003 | 0.81x | $1.16 Million | $1.43 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.81x | $1.16 Million | $1.43 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2001 | 1.32x | $3.88 Million | $2.93 Million | ▲ +554.4% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $960.30K | $4.75 Million | ▲ +101.9% |
| 1998 | -10.44x | $-1.77 Million | $169.50K | — |