Live Ventures Inc (LIVE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Live Ventures Inc (LIVE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $9.85 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($293.93 Million) in one year. See LIVE FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Live Ventures Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Live Ventures Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Live Ventures Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Live Ventures Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Live Ventures Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LIVE market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $28.67 Million | $291.10 Million | ▲ +59.9% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $20.61 Million | $334.66 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $26.00 Million | $321.68 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $14.58 Million | $181.47 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $29.19 Million | $136.66 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $28.79 Million | $153.59 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $19.05 Million | $88.32 Million | ▲ +86.2% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $11.82 Million | $102.08 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $7.87 Million | $95.01 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | $6.06 Million | $29.27 Million | ▲ +758.2% |
| 2015 | -0.03x | $-1.02 Million | $32.40 Million | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2014 | -0.99x | $-5.19 Million | $5.22 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 2013 | -2.19x | $-1.81 Million | $823.52K | ▼ -10894.8% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $28.98K | $1.43 Million | ▲ +101.0% |
| 2011 | -2.10x | $-4.32 Million | $2.06 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2010 | -2.96x | $-3.94 Million | $1.33 Million | ▼ -82.4% |
| 2009 | -1.62x | $-2.96 Million | $1.83 Million | ▼ -501.2% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $1.33 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2007 | 0.76x | $1.77 Million | $2.33 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2006 | 0.56x | $2.42 Million | $4.35 Million | ▼ -87.5% |
| 2005 | 4.46x | $6.99 Million | $1.57 Million | ▲ +337.7% |
| 2004 | 1.02x | $4.76 Million | $4.67 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2003 | 0.81x | $1.16 Million | $1.43 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.81x | $1.16 Million | $1.43 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2001 | 1.32x | $3.88 Million | $2.93 Million | ▲ +554.4% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $960.30K | $4.75 Million | ▲ +101.9% |
| 1998 | -10.44x | $-1.77 Million | $169.50K | — |