LightPath Technologies Inc (LPTH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
LightPath Technologies Inc (LPTH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.22x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($31.38 Million) in one year. Check how aggressively does LightPath Technologies Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
LightPath Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for LightPath Technologies Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore LightPath Technologies Inc balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for LightPath Technologies Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LightPath Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of LightPath Technologies Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.13x | $-8.33 Million | $65.86 Million | ▼ -534.3% |
| 2024 | 0.03x | $521.04K | $17.89 Million | ▲ +118.2% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-2.81 Million | $17.58 Million | ▼ -329.0% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $1.46 Million | $20.98 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | $4.73 Million | $21.03 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | $3.73 Million | $13.01 Million | ▲ +773.3% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $411.19K | $12.51 Million | ▼ -85.2% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $2.62 Million | $11.76 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2017 | 0.29x | $5.00 Million | $16.95 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2016 | 0.33x | $1.53 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +763.1% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $178.96K | $4.71 Million | ▲ +245.2% |
| 2014 | -0.03x | $-88.78K | $3.40 Million | ▼ -113.9% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $556.16K | $2.95 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $405.73K | $4.27 Million | ▲ +209.0% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $94.90K | $3.09 Million | ▲ +121.0% |
| 2010 | -0.15x | $-470.70K | $3.21 Million | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2009 | -0.35x | $-1.47 Million | $4.14 Million | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2008 | -1.02x | $-3.39 Million | $3.33 Million | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2007 | -0.74x | $-1.86 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2006 | -0.72x | $-1.99 Million | $2.74 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2005 | -0.66x | $-1.10 Million | $1.68 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2004 | -1.47x | $-2.49 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 2003 | -7.35x | $-9.68 Million | $1.32 Million | ▼ -159.3% |
| 2002 | -2.83x | $-12.85 Million | $4.53 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2001 | -2.39x | $-14.97 Million | $6.27 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2000 | -1.37x | $-3.26 Million | $2.37 Million | ▲ +84.8% |
| 1999 | -9.00x | $-2.70 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -250.0% |
| 1998 | -2.57x | $-3.60 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 1997 | -4.83x | $-2.90 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -47.1% |
| 1996 | -3.29x | $-2.30 Million | $700.00K | — |