LightPath Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
LightPath Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. LightPath Technologies Inc (LPTH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.22x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($31.38 Million) in one year. Check LightPath Technologies Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of LightPath Technologies Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of LightPath Technologies Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for LightPath Technologies Inc across 30 annual periods. Check LightPath Technologies Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
LightPath Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
LightPath Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LightPath Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of LightPath Technologies Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.13x | $-8.33 Million | $65.86 Million | ▼ -534.3% |
| 2024 | 0.03x | $521.04K | $17.89 Million | ▲ +118.2% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-2.81 Million | $17.58 Million | ▼ -329.0% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $1.46 Million | $20.98 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | $4.73 Million | $21.03 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | $3.73 Million | $13.01 Million | ▲ +773.3% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $411.19K | $12.51 Million | ▼ -85.2% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $2.62 Million | $11.76 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2017 | 0.29x | $5.00 Million | $16.95 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2016 | 0.33x | $1.53 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +763.1% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $178.96K | $4.71 Million | ▲ +245.2% |
| 2014 | -0.03x | $-88.78K | $3.40 Million | ▼ -113.9% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $556.16K | $2.95 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $405.73K | $4.27 Million | ▲ +209.0% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $94.90K | $3.09 Million | ▲ +121.0% |
| 2010 | -0.15x | $-470.70K | $3.21 Million | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2009 | -0.35x | $-1.47 Million | $4.14 Million | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2008 | -1.02x | $-3.39 Million | $3.33 Million | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2007 | -0.74x | $-1.86 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2006 | -0.72x | $-1.99 Million | $2.74 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2005 | -0.66x | $-1.10 Million | $1.68 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2004 | -1.47x | $-2.49 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 2003 | -7.35x | $-9.68 Million | $1.32 Million | ▼ -159.3% |
| 2002 | -2.83x | $-12.85 Million | $4.53 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2001 | -2.39x | $-14.97 Million | $6.27 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2000 | -1.37x | $-3.26 Million | $2.37 Million | ▲ +84.8% |
| 1999 | -9.00x | $-2.70 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -250.0% |
| 1998 | -2.57x | $-3.60 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 1997 | -4.83x | $-2.90 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -47.1% |
| 1996 | -3.29x | $-2.30 Million | $700.00K | — |