LightPath Technologies Inc (LPTH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
LightPath Technologies Inc (LPTH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.22x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($31.38 Million) in one year. See LPTH financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
LightPath Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for LightPath Technologies Inc across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LightPath Technologies Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for LightPath Technologies Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LightPath Technologies Inc. Check cash flow quality index of LightPath Technologies Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.13x | $-8.33 Million | $65.86 Million | ▼ -534.3% |
| 2024 | 0.03x | $521.04K | $17.89 Million | ▲ +118.2% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-2.81 Million | $17.58 Million | ▼ -329.0% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $1.46 Million | $20.98 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | $4.73 Million | $21.03 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | $3.73 Million | $13.01 Million | ▲ +773.3% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $411.19K | $12.51 Million | ▼ -85.2% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $2.62 Million | $11.76 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2017 | 0.29x | $5.00 Million | $16.95 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2016 | 0.33x | $1.53 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +763.1% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $178.96K | $4.71 Million | ▲ +245.2% |
| 2014 | -0.03x | $-88.78K | $3.40 Million | ▼ -113.9% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $556.16K | $2.95 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $405.73K | $4.27 Million | ▲ +209.0% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $94.90K | $3.09 Million | ▲ +121.0% |
| 2010 | -0.15x | $-470.70K | $3.21 Million | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2009 | -0.35x | $-1.47 Million | $4.14 Million | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2008 | -1.02x | $-3.39 Million | $3.33 Million | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2007 | -0.74x | $-1.86 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2006 | -0.72x | $-1.99 Million | $2.74 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2005 | -0.66x | $-1.10 Million | $1.68 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2004 | -1.47x | $-2.49 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 2003 | -7.35x | $-9.68 Million | $1.32 Million | ▼ -159.3% |
| 2002 | -2.83x | $-12.85 Million | $4.53 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2001 | -2.39x | $-14.97 Million | $6.27 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2000 | -1.37x | $-3.26 Million | $2.37 Million | ▲ +84.8% |
| 1999 | -9.00x | $-2.70 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -250.0% |
| 1998 | -2.57x | $-3.60 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 1997 | -4.83x | $-2.90 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -47.1% |
| 1996 | -3.29x | $-2.30 Million | $700.00K | — |