LightPath Technologies Inc (LPTH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
LightPath Technologies Inc (LPTH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.22x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($31.38 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of LightPath Technologies Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
LightPath Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for LightPath Technologies Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of LightPath Technologies Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for LightPath Technologies Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LightPath Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LightPath Technologies Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.13x | $-8.33 Million | $65.86 Million | ▼ -534.3% |
| 2024 | 0.03x | $521.04K | $17.89 Million | ▲ +118.2% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-2.81 Million | $17.58 Million | ▼ -329.0% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $1.46 Million | $20.98 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | $4.73 Million | $21.03 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | $3.73 Million | $13.01 Million | ▲ +773.3% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $411.19K | $12.51 Million | ▼ -85.2% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $2.62 Million | $11.76 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2017 | 0.29x | $5.00 Million | $16.95 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2016 | 0.33x | $1.53 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +763.1% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $178.96K | $4.71 Million | ▲ +245.2% |
| 2014 | -0.03x | $-88.78K | $3.40 Million | ▼ -113.9% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $556.16K | $2.95 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $405.73K | $4.27 Million | ▲ +209.0% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $94.90K | $3.09 Million | ▲ +121.0% |
| 2010 | -0.15x | $-470.70K | $3.21 Million | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2009 | -0.35x | $-1.47 Million | $4.14 Million | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2008 | -1.02x | $-3.39 Million | $3.33 Million | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2007 | -0.74x | $-1.86 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2006 | -0.72x | $-1.99 Million | $2.74 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2005 | -0.66x | $-1.10 Million | $1.68 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2004 | -1.47x | $-2.49 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 2003 | -7.35x | $-9.68 Million | $1.32 Million | ▼ -159.3% |
| 2002 | -2.83x | $-12.85 Million | $4.53 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2001 | -2.39x | $-14.97 Million | $6.27 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2000 | -1.37x | $-3.26 Million | $2.37 Million | ▲ +84.8% |
| 1999 | -9.00x | $-2.70 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -250.0% |
| 1998 | -2.57x | $-3.60 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 1997 | -4.83x | $-2.90 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -47.1% |
| 1996 | -3.29x | $-2.30 Million | $700.00K | — |