Lam Research Corp (LRCX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lam Research Corp (LRCX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.14 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.21 Billion) in one year. See Lam Research Corp free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lam Research Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lam Research Corp across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lam Research Corp (LRCX) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lam Research Corp (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lam Research Corp. Check earnings quality score of Lam Research Corp to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.54x | $6.17 Billion | $11.48 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2024 | 0.46x | $4.65 Billion | $10.21 Billion | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2023 | 0.49x | $5.18 Billion | $10.57 Billion | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | $3.10 Billion | $10.92 Billion | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2021 | 0.36x | $3.59 Billion | $9.86 Billion | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $2.13 Billion | $9.38 Billion | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $3.18 Billion | $7.28 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2018 | 0.45x | $2.66 Billion | $5.90 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2017 | 0.40x | $2.03 Billion | $5.14 Billion | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $1.35 Billion | $6.17 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $785.50 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2014 | 0.26x | $717.05 Million | $2.78 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2013 | 0.28x | $719.93 Million | $2.57 Billion | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $499.03 Million | $2.68 Billion | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | $881.03 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $350.71 Million | $719.26 Million | ▲ +411.3% |
| 2009 | -0.16x | $-78.13 Million | $498.78 Million | ▼ -127.1% |
| 2008 | 0.58x | $590.32 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2007 | 0.89x | $823.60 Million | $925.00 Million | ▲ +126.4% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $360.69 Million | $917.20 Million | ▼ -64.7% |
| 2005 | 1.12x | $425.93 Million | $381.92 Million | ▲ +174.0% |
| 2004 | 0.41x | $157.15 Million | $386.16 Million | ▲ +222.8% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $69.24 Million | $549.19 Million | ▲ +453.7% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $21.80 Million | $957.24 Million | ▼ -89.9% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | $261.29 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $119.85 Million | $609.41 Million | ▲ +401.5% |
| 1999 | -0.07x | $-37.22 Million | $570.50 Million | ▼ -179.9% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $51.24 Million | $627.68 Million | ▼ -61.8% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $80.17 Million | $374.81 Million | ▲ +189.0% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $26.61 Million | $359.58 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $19.10 Million | $287.39 Million | ▲ +115.9% |
| 1994 | 0.03x | $6.30 Million | $204.70 Million | ▲ +144.4% |
| 1993 | -0.07x | $-9.60 Million | $138.50 Million | ▼ -233.3% |
| 1992 | 0.05x | $2.60 Million | $50.00 Million | ▲ +822.8% |
| 1991 | -0.01x | $-400.00K | $55.60 Million | ▼ -109.3% |
| 1990 | 0.08x | $4.00 Million | $51.80 Million | ▲ +181.0% |
| 1989 | -0.10x | $-3.70 Million | $38.80 Million | — |