Lam Research Corp (LRCX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lam Research Corp (LRCX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.14 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.21 Billion) in one year. See Lam Research Corp (LRCX) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lam Research Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lam Research Corp across 37 annual periods. Also explore Lam Research Corp annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lam Research Corp (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lam Research Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LRCX company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.54x | $6.17 Billion | $11.48 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2024 | 0.46x | $4.65 Billion | $10.21 Billion | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2023 | 0.49x | $5.18 Billion | $10.57 Billion | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | $3.10 Billion | $10.92 Billion | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2021 | 0.36x | $3.59 Billion | $9.86 Billion | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $2.13 Billion | $9.38 Billion | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $3.18 Billion | $7.28 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2018 | 0.45x | $2.66 Billion | $5.90 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2017 | 0.40x | $2.03 Billion | $5.14 Billion | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $1.35 Billion | $6.17 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $785.50 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2014 | 0.26x | $717.05 Million | $2.78 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2013 | 0.28x | $719.93 Million | $2.57 Billion | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $499.03 Million | $2.68 Billion | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | $881.03 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $350.71 Million | $719.26 Million | ▲ +411.3% |
| 2009 | -0.16x | $-78.13 Million | $498.78 Million | ▼ -127.1% |
| 2008 | 0.58x | $590.32 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2007 | 0.89x | $823.60 Million | $925.00 Million | ▲ +126.4% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $360.69 Million | $917.20 Million | ▼ -64.7% |
| 2005 | 1.12x | $425.93 Million | $381.92 Million | ▲ +174.0% |
| 2004 | 0.41x | $157.15 Million | $386.16 Million | ▲ +222.8% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $69.24 Million | $549.19 Million | ▲ +453.7% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $21.80 Million | $957.24 Million | ▼ -89.9% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | $261.29 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $119.85 Million | $609.41 Million | ▲ +401.5% |
| 1999 | -0.07x | $-37.22 Million | $570.50 Million | ▼ -179.9% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $51.24 Million | $627.68 Million | ▼ -61.8% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $80.17 Million | $374.81 Million | ▲ +189.0% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $26.61 Million | $359.58 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $19.10 Million | $287.39 Million | ▲ +115.9% |
| 1994 | 0.03x | $6.30 Million | $204.70 Million | ▲ +144.4% |
| 1993 | -0.07x | $-9.60 Million | $138.50 Million | ▼ -233.3% |
| 1992 | 0.05x | $2.60 Million | $50.00 Million | ▲ +822.8% |
| 1991 | -0.01x | $-400.00K | $55.60 Million | ▼ -109.3% |
| 1990 | 0.08x | $4.00 Million | $51.80 Million | ▲ +181.0% |
| 1989 | -0.10x | $-3.70 Million | $38.80 Million | — |