Lam Research Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lam Research Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lam Research Corp (LRCX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.14 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.21 Billion) in one year. Check Lam Research Corp earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lam Research Corp (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lam Research Corp from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lam Research Corp across 37 annual periods. Check Lam Research Corp (LRCX) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Lam Research Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Lam Research Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lam Research Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LRCX operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.54x | $6.17 Billion | $11.48 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2024 | 0.46x | $4.65 Billion | $10.21 Billion | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2023 | 0.49x | $5.18 Billion | $10.57 Billion | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | $3.10 Billion | $10.92 Billion | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2021 | 0.36x | $3.59 Billion | $9.86 Billion | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $2.13 Billion | $9.38 Billion | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $3.18 Billion | $7.28 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2018 | 0.45x | $2.66 Billion | $5.90 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2017 | 0.40x | $2.03 Billion | $5.14 Billion | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $1.35 Billion | $6.17 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $785.50 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2014 | 0.26x | $717.05 Million | $2.78 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2013 | 0.28x | $719.93 Million | $2.57 Billion | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $499.03 Million | $2.68 Billion | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | $881.03 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $350.71 Million | $719.26 Million | ▲ +411.3% |
| 2009 | -0.16x | $-78.13 Million | $498.78 Million | ▼ -127.1% |
| 2008 | 0.58x | $590.32 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2007 | 0.89x | $823.60 Million | $925.00 Million | ▲ +126.4% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $360.69 Million | $917.20 Million | ▼ -64.7% |
| 2005 | 1.12x | $425.93 Million | $381.92 Million | ▲ +174.0% |
| 2004 | 0.41x | $157.15 Million | $386.16 Million | ▲ +222.8% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $69.24 Million | $549.19 Million | ▲ +453.7% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $21.80 Million | $957.24 Million | ▼ -89.9% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | $261.29 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $119.85 Million | $609.41 Million | ▲ +401.5% |
| 1999 | -0.07x | $-37.22 Million | $570.50 Million | ▼ -179.9% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $51.24 Million | $627.68 Million | ▼ -61.8% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $80.17 Million | $374.81 Million | ▲ +189.0% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $26.61 Million | $359.58 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $19.10 Million | $287.39 Million | ▲ +115.9% |
| 1994 | 0.03x | $6.30 Million | $204.70 Million | ▲ +144.4% |
| 1993 | -0.07x | $-9.60 Million | $138.50 Million | ▼ -233.3% |
| 1992 | 0.05x | $2.60 Million | $50.00 Million | ▲ +822.8% |
| 1991 | -0.01x | $-400.00K | $55.60 Million | ▼ -109.3% |
| 1990 | 0.08x | $4.00 Million | $51.80 Million | ▲ +181.0% |
| 1989 | -0.10x | $-3.70 Million | $38.80 Million | — |