Lam Research Corp (LRCX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lam Research Corp (LRCX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.14 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.21 Billion) in one year. Explore LRCX long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lam Research Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lam Research Corp across 37 annual periods. Also explore Lam Research Corp (LRCX) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lam Research Corp (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lam Research Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Lam Research Corp market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.54x | $6.17 Billion | $11.48 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2024 | 0.46x | $4.65 Billion | $10.21 Billion | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2023 | 0.49x | $5.18 Billion | $10.57 Billion | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | $3.10 Billion | $10.92 Billion | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2021 | 0.36x | $3.59 Billion | $9.86 Billion | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $2.13 Billion | $9.38 Billion | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $3.18 Billion | $7.28 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2018 | 0.45x | $2.66 Billion | $5.90 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2017 | 0.40x | $2.03 Billion | $5.14 Billion | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $1.35 Billion | $6.17 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $785.50 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2014 | 0.26x | $717.05 Million | $2.78 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2013 | 0.28x | $719.93 Million | $2.57 Billion | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $499.03 Million | $2.68 Billion | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | $881.03 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $350.71 Million | $719.26 Million | ▲ +411.3% |
| 2009 | -0.16x | $-78.13 Million | $498.78 Million | ▼ -127.1% |
| 2008 | 0.58x | $590.32 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2007 | 0.89x | $823.60 Million | $925.00 Million | ▲ +126.4% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $360.69 Million | $917.20 Million | ▼ -64.7% |
| 2005 | 1.12x | $425.93 Million | $381.92 Million | ▲ +174.0% |
| 2004 | 0.41x | $157.15 Million | $386.16 Million | ▲ +222.8% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $69.24 Million | $549.19 Million | ▲ +453.7% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $21.80 Million | $957.24 Million | ▼ -89.9% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | $261.29 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $119.85 Million | $609.41 Million | ▲ +401.5% |
| 1999 | -0.07x | $-37.22 Million | $570.50 Million | ▼ -179.9% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $51.24 Million | $627.68 Million | ▼ -61.8% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $80.17 Million | $374.81 Million | ▲ +189.0% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $26.61 Million | $359.58 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $19.10 Million | $287.39 Million | ▲ +115.9% |
| 1994 | 0.03x | $6.30 Million | $204.70 Million | ▲ +144.4% |
| 1993 | -0.07x | $-9.60 Million | $138.50 Million | ▼ -233.3% |
| 1992 | 0.05x | $2.60 Million | $50.00 Million | ▲ +822.8% |
| 1991 | -0.01x | $-400.00K | $55.60 Million | ▼ -109.3% |
| 1990 | 0.08x | $4.00 Million | $51.80 Million | ▲ +181.0% |
| 1989 | -0.10x | $-3.70 Million | $38.80 Million | — |