Lisata Therapeutics Inc. (LSTA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lisata Therapeutics Inc. (LSTA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.72x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.34 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($4.64 Million) in one year. Explore how much of Lisata Therapeutics Inc.'s assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lisata Therapeutics Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lisata Therapeutics Inc. across 31 annual periods. Also explore Lisata Therapeutics Inc. asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lisata Therapeutics Inc. (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lisata Therapeutics Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Lisata Therapeutics Inc. (LSTA) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -3.40x | $-19.36 Million | $5.68 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2023 | -2.95x | $-20.03 Million | $6.80 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2022 | -3.15x | $-21.17 Million | $6.71 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2021 | -4.44x | $-22.25 Million | $5.01 Million | ▼ -89.3% |
| 2020 | -2.35x | $-8.82 Million | $3.76 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2019 | -2.86x | $-18.88 Million | $6.60 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2018 | -2.80x | $-19.99 Million | $7.13 Million | ▼ -77.2% |
| 2017 | -1.58x | $-20.88 Million | $13.19 Million | ▼ -219.5% |
| 2016 | -0.50x | $-23.67 Million | $47.77 Million | ▲ +57.2% |
| 2015 | -1.16x | $-39.26 Million | $33.92 Million | ▼ -68.3% |
| 2014 | -0.69x | $-46.90 Million | $68.20 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2013 | -0.98x | $-27.10 Million | $27.79 Million | ▼ -52.0% |
| 2012 | -0.64x | $-13.85 Million | $21.59 Million | ▼ -130.6% |
| 2011 | -0.28x | $-20.93 Million | $75.20 Million | ▼ -85.6% |
| 2010 | -0.15x | $-8.48 Million | $56.54 Million | ▲ +19.5% |
| 2009 | -0.19x | $-8.65 Million | $46.45 Million | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2008 | -4.92x | $-4.73 Million | $961.14K | ▲ +63.2% |
| 2007 | -13.36x | $-6.13 Million | $458.95K | ▼ -231.5% |
| 2006 | -4.03x | $-3.64 Million | $902.87K | ▼ -1089.0% |
| 2005 | -0.34x | $-834.00K | $2.46 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2004 | -0.72x | $-1.46 Million | $2.03 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2003 | -0.56x | $-1.02 Million | $1.81 Million | ▼ -212.4% |
| 2002 | 0.50x | $1.01 Million | $2.01 Million | ▲ +296.0% |
| 2001 | -0.26x | $-373.84K | $1.46 Million | ▲ +80.8% |
| 2000 | -1.33x | $-1.98 Million | $1.49 Million | ▼ -355.6% |
| 1999 | -0.29x | $-364.12K | $1.25 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 1998 | -0.22x | $-269.60K | $1.21 Million | ▲ +51.3% |
| 1996 | -0.46x | $-304.27K | $666.62K | ▲ +75.2% |
| 1995 | -1.84x | $-838.44K | $455.31K | ▼ -2684.2% |
| 1994 | -0.07x | $-840.00K | $12.70 Million | ▼ -208.4% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $470.00K | $7.70 Million | — |