Lightbridge Corp (LTBR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lightbridge Corp (LTBR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -3.69x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.77 Million could theoretically repay -4% of its total liabilities ($1.29 Million) in one year. See Lightbridge Corp (LTBR) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lightbridge Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lightbridge Corp across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lightbridge Corp cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lightbridge Corp (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lightbridge Corp. Check cash flow quality index of Lightbridge Corp to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -16.85x | $-14.28 Million | $847.45K | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2024 | -22.36x | $-9.49 Million | $424.58K | ▼ -67.7% |
| 2023 | -13.33x | $-6.48 Million | $486.33K | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2022 | -19.31x | $-6.76 Million | $350.33K | ▲ +70.0% |
| 2021 | -64.34x | $-11.04 Million | $171.52K | ▼ -3340.0% |
| 2020 | -1.87x | $-8.57 Million | $4.58 Million | ▲ +90.2% |
| 2019 | -19.03x | $-6.67 Million | $350.30K | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2018 | -15.58x | $-7.42 Million | $476.32K | ▼ -258.5% |
| 2017 | -4.35x | $-5.00 Million | $1.15 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2016 | -4.80x | $-5.98 Million | $1.24 Million | ▼ -387.4% |
| 2015 | -0.98x | $-3.65 Million | $3.71 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2014 | -0.82x | $-4.32 Million | $5.29 Million | ▲ +90.1% |
| 2013 | -8.22x | $-3.92 Million | $476.63K | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2012 | -13.12x | $-5.05 Million | $385.22K | ▼ -444.3% |
| 2011 | -2.41x | $-4.05 Million | $1.68 Million | ▼ -123.2% |
| 2010 | -1.08x | $-2.36 Million | $2.19 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2009 | -1.18x | $-2.56 Million | $2.16 Million | ▼ -68.4% |
| 2008 | -0.70x | $-3.61 Million | $5.14 Million | ▼ -403.1% |
| 2007 | -0.14x | $-997.38K | $7.13 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2006 | -0.26x | $-3.75 Million | $14.66 Million | ▼ -193.7% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $87.06K | $319.12K | ▲ +967.0% |
| 2004 | -0.03x | $-7.08K | $224.98K | ▼ -125.9% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-10.29K | $739.08K | ▲ +84.9% |
| 2002 | -0.09x | $-65.16K | $704.43K | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2001 | -0.18x | $-113.18K | $630.66K | ▲ +77.2% |
| 2000 | -0.79x | $-703.94K | $894.90K | ▼ -28.6% |
| 1998 | -0.61x | $-33.56K | $54.87K | — |