Lightbridge Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lightbridge Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lightbridge Corp (LTBR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -3.69x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.77 Million could theoretically repay -4% of its total liabilities ($1.29 Million) in one year. Check LTBR operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lightbridge Corp (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lightbridge Corp from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lightbridge Corp across 27 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Lightbridge Corp to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Lightbridge Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Lightbridge Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lightbridge Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Lightbridge Corp generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -16.85x | $-14.28 Million | $847.45K | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2024 | -22.36x | $-9.49 Million | $424.58K | ▼ -67.7% |
| 2023 | -13.33x | $-6.48 Million | $486.33K | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2022 | -19.31x | $-6.76 Million | $350.33K | ▲ +70.0% |
| 2021 | -64.34x | $-11.04 Million | $171.52K | ▼ -3340.0% |
| 2020 | -1.87x | $-8.57 Million | $4.58 Million | ▲ +90.2% |
| 2019 | -19.03x | $-6.67 Million | $350.30K | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2018 | -15.58x | $-7.42 Million | $476.32K | ▼ -258.5% |
| 2017 | -4.35x | $-5.00 Million | $1.15 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2016 | -4.80x | $-5.98 Million | $1.24 Million | ▼ -387.4% |
| 2015 | -0.98x | $-3.65 Million | $3.71 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2014 | -0.82x | $-4.32 Million | $5.29 Million | ▲ +90.1% |
| 2013 | -8.22x | $-3.92 Million | $476.63K | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2012 | -13.12x | $-5.05 Million | $385.22K | ▼ -444.3% |
| 2011 | -2.41x | $-4.05 Million | $1.68 Million | ▼ -123.2% |
| 2010 | -1.08x | $-2.36 Million | $2.19 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2009 | -1.18x | $-2.56 Million | $2.16 Million | ▼ -68.4% |
| 2008 | -0.70x | $-3.61 Million | $5.14 Million | ▼ -403.1% |
| 2007 | -0.14x | $-997.38K | $7.13 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2006 | -0.26x | $-3.75 Million | $14.66 Million | ▼ -193.7% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $87.06K | $319.12K | ▲ +967.0% |
| 2004 | -0.03x | $-7.08K | $224.98K | ▼ -125.9% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-10.29K | $739.08K | ▲ +84.9% |
| 2002 | -0.09x | $-65.16K | $704.43K | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2001 | -0.18x | $-113.18K | $630.66K | ▲ +77.2% |
| 2000 | -0.79x | $-703.94K | $894.90K | ▼ -28.6% |
| 1998 | -0.61x | $-33.56K | $54.87K | — |